• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

金融发展对二氧化碳排放的影响:发展中国家(D)和发达国家(G)的比较分析。

Impact of financial development on CO emissions: A comparative analysis of developing countries (D) and developed countries (G).

机构信息

Centre for Economic Research, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Department of Economics, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(11):12461-12475. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06680-z. Epub 2020 Jan 29.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-019-06680-z
PMID:31997243
Abstract

Financial development is one of the key drivers of rapid economic growth as well as CO emission in the environment. This study aims to investigate the casual links between financial development and CO emission in G8 and D8 countries for the time period from 1999 to 2013. We used PCA to develop financial development index from its five sub-components. Second-generation panel unit root tests are applied to check the stationary level and to tackle the presence of cross-sectional dependence in panels. The empirical results of PMG-panel ARDL technique show that financial development has significant and positive impact on carbon emission at a 1% statistical level in both panels in the long-run. The impact of financial development and energy consumption is more evident in D and G countries respectively. The energy use and trade openness affect positively while GDP significantly causes to decline the carbon emissions at 1% statistical level. The results of D-H causality test show that majority of the variables have one-way causality towards COemission in both panels except the financial development and energy use having two-way causality in G8 panel only. The empirical findings of the present study suggest that through improved financial system, more funds should be invested in clean energy projects to adopt the renewable energy, strict monetary policies should be implemented to reduce the consumption of big ticket items, and adoption of measure to reduce trade embodied emission is suggested.

摘要

金融发展是快速经济增长和环境中二氧化碳排放的关键驱动因素之一。本研究旨在调查 1999 年至 2013 年间,G8 和 D8 国家金融发展与二氧化碳排放之间的因果关系。我们使用主成分分析从五个子成分中开发金融发展指数。第二代面板单位根检验用于检查面板的平稳性并解决横截面依赖性的存在。PMG 面板 ARDL 技术的实证结果表明,在长期内,两个面板中金融发展对碳排放量具有显著的正影响,在 1%的统计水平上。金融发展和能源消耗的影响在 D 和 G 国家分别更为明显。能源使用和贸易开放度呈正相关,而 GDP 则在 1%的统计水平上显著导致碳排放量下降。D-H 因果关系检验的结果表明,除了 G8 面板中金融发展和能源使用具有双向因果关系外,大多数变量在两个面板中对 CO 排放都有单向因果关系。本研究的实证结果表明,通过完善金融体系,应将更多资金投资于清洁能源项目,以采用可再生能源,应实施严格的货币政策以减少对大件物品的消费,并应采取措施减少贸易隐含排放。

相似文献

1
Impact of financial development on CO emissions: A comparative analysis of developing countries (D) and developed countries (G).金融发展对二氧化碳排放的影响:发展中国家(D)和发达国家(G)的比较分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(11):12461-12475. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06680-z. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
2
Effect of economic growth, energy use, trade openness and foreign direct investments on carbon dioxide emissions. Evidence from G8 countries.经济增长、能源利用、贸易开放和外国直接投资对二氧化碳排放的影响。八国集团国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Nov;30(53):113538-113552. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29827-5. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
3
Analysis of the dynamics of environmental degradation for 18 upper middle-income countries: the role of financial development.分析 18 个中上收入国家环境恶化的动态:金融发展的作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Sep;29(43):64647-64664. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20290-2. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
4
The impact of globalization and financial development on environmental quality: evidence from selected countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).全球化和金融发展对环境质量的影响:来自经济合作与发展组织(经合组织)选定国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 May;26(13):13246-13262. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04761-7. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
5
ICT, renewable energy, financial development, and CO emissions in developing countries of East and South Asia.东亚和南亚发展中国家的信息通信技术、可再生能源、金融发展与二氧化碳排放。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(23):35025-35035. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18664-7. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
6
Modeling financial development, tourism, energy consumption, and environmental quality: Is there any discrepancy between developing and developed countries?构建金融发展、旅游、能源消费和环境质量模型:发展中国家和发达国家之间存在差异吗?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Nov;28(41):58480-58501. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14837-y. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
7
Causality links among renewable energy consumption, CO emissions, and economic growth in Africa: evidence from a panel ARDL-PMG approach.非洲可再生能源消费、碳排放与经济增长之间的因果关系:来自面板自回归分布滞后-均值组估计方法的证据
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 May;24(14):13036-13048. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8850-7. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
8
The effect of ICT, financial development, growth, and trade openness on CO emissions: an empirical analysis.信息通信技术、金融发展、增长和贸易开放度对二氧化碳排放的影响:实证分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Oct;25(30):30708-30719. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3108-6. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
9
The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption, trade, and financial development on carbon emissions in low-, middle-, and high-income countries.可再生能源消费、贸易和金融发展对低收入、中等收入和高收入国家碳排放的动态影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(19):56759-56773. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26404-8. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
10
The effect of technological innovation, FDI, and financial development on CO2 emission: evidence from the G8 countries.技术创新、外国直接投资和金融发展对二氧化碳排放的影响:来自八国集团国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(8):11654-11662. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15993-x. Epub 2021 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The validity of the environmental Kuznets curve in the presence of long-run civil wars: A case of Afghanistan.长期内战背景下环境库兹涅茨曲线的有效性:以阿富汗为例。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 1;10(3):e25341. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25341. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
2
Linking governance with environmental quality: a global perspective.将治理与环境质量相联系:全球视角
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 12;13(1):15086. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42221-y.
3
Relationship between financial inclusion and carbon emissions: International evidence.金融包容性与碳排放之间的关系:国际证据。

本文引用的文献

1
An empirical evaluation of financial development-carbon footprint nexus in One Belt and Road region.“一带一路”区域金融发展与碳足迹关系的实证评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Aug;26(24):25026-25036. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05757-z. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
2
Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia.全球化是否会增加生态足迹?来自马来西亚的实证证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jun;26(18):18565-18582. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05224-9. Epub 2019 May 3.
3
Investigating the determinant factors of environmental quality (based on ecological carbon footprint index).
Heliyon. 2023 May 23;9(6):e16472. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16472. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Analysis of Government Expenditure and the Causal Effect.经济增长与环境质量:政府支出与因果效应分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 26;19(17):10629. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710629.
5
The Non-Linear Impact of Financial Development on Environmental Quality and Sustainability: Evidence from G7 Countries.金融发展对环境质量和可持续性的非线性影响:来自 G7 国家的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 8;19(14):8382. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148382.
6
"Does Institutional Quality, Natural Resources, Globalization, and Renewable Energy Contribute to Environmental Pollution in China? Role of Financialization".机构质量、自然资源、全球化和可再生能源是否会导致中国的环境污染?金融化的作用
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 31;10:849946. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.849946. eCollection 2022.
7
Why are some countries cleaner than others? New evidence from macroeconomic governance.为什么有些国家比其他国家更清洁?来自宏观经济治理的新证据。
Environ Dev Sustain. 2023;25(7):6167-6223. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02298-3. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
8
Environmental concerns of financial inclusion and economic policy uncertainty in the era of globalization: evidence from low & high globalized OECD economies.全球化时代金融包容性和经济政策不确定性的环境问题:来自低&高全球化 OECD 经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(24):36773-36787. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18758-2. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
9
Nexus between environmental, social and economic development in South Asia: evidence from econometric models.南亚环境、社会与经济发展之间的联系:来自计量经济学模型的证据
Heliyon. 2021 Jan 13;7(1):e05965. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05965. eCollection 2021 Jan.
10
The effects of FDI, technological innovation, and financial development on CO emissions: evidence from the BRICS countries.FDI、技术创新和金融发展对 CO 排放的影响:来自金砖国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jul;27(19):23899-23913. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08715-2. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
研究环境质量的决定因素(基于生态碳足迹指数)。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Apr;26(10):10276-10291. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04452-3. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
4
The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation.“一带一路”国家金融发展对生态足迹的影响:基于面板数据估计的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Feb;26(6):6199-6208. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3992-9. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
5
Tracing the trade-pollution nexus in global value chains: evidence from air pollution indicators.追溯全球价值链中的贸易-污染关系:来自空气污染指标的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Feb;26(5):5221-5233. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3956-0. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
6
What drives environmental degradation? Evidence from 14 Sub-Saharan African countries.什么导致了环境恶化?来自撒哈拉以南非洲 14 个国家的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 15;656:165-173. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.354. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
7
The trade-environment nexus in light of governance: a global potential.鉴于治理:全球潜力下的贸易-环境关系
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Dec;25(34):34360-34379. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3390-3. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
8
Testing EKC hypothesis with energy and sustainable development challenges: a fresh evidence from belt and road initiative economies.检验能源和可持续发展挑战下的 EKC 假说:来自“一带一路”倡议经济体的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Nov;25(32):32066-32080. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3052-5. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
9
Driving forces and mitigation potential of global CO emissions from 1980 through 2030: Evidence from countries with different income levels.1980 年至 2030 年全球 CO 排放的驱动因素及减排潜力:不同收入水平国家的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 1;649:335-343. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.326. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
10
A three-step strategy for decoupling economic growth from carbon emission: Empirical evidences from 133 countries.三步策略实现经济增长与碳排放脱钩:来自 133 个国家的经验证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jan 1;646:524-543. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.045. Epub 2018 Jul 26.