• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检验能源和可持续发展挑战下的 EKC 假说:来自“一带一路”倡议经济体的新证据。

Testing EKC hypothesis with energy and sustainable development challenges: a fresh evidence from belt and road initiative economies.

机构信息

Department of Finance, School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.

School of Economics, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Nov;25(32):32066-32080. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3052-5. Epub 2018 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-018-3052-5
PMID:30218332
Abstract

Diverse impact of greenhouse gasses (GHGs) over the landscape of environment is generally believed in literature. As CO2 emission acutely leads to GHGs is a major contributor for global warming, it creates a serious pressure on natural resources and ecological settings. Similarly, low-carbon (CO2) economy, plenty of energy resources, and sustainable growth are a big ask for worldwide economies in this era of mechanization. This paper analyzes the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis, for Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) economies, to contend the role of mega projects in BRI as an attribute for ecological detriments. The on-hand study engages fresh data information ranging from 1981 to 2016 holding with heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence as a special deliberation. The calculated outcomes expose that, mean group estimator provides strong evidence and favor the existence of EKC approximately in every region. The long-run influence is measured by pooled mean group estimators, which shows significant outcomes in every region; additionally, the EKC hypothesis affirmed in the long run especially for developed economies. Mega projects, i.e., BRI requisite immense energy sources to accomplishing the enclosed projects efficiently and effectively. The positive association between carbon emission and energy consumption troubled the governments to make policies for restraining the magnitude of carbon emission and controls energy usage for enduring environment to its original position. Next, the valuations depicted the dense recommendations for state administrations in capacity of rigorous level supremacy, trash managing campaigns, renewable energy reliance, and advance for desirable judgments to sterilize the atmosphere.

摘要

温室气体(GHGs)对环境景观的影响是文献中普遍认为的。由于二氧化碳排放是温室气体的主要来源,因此它对自然资源和生态环境造成了严重的压力。同样,在这个机械化时代,低碳(CO2)经济、丰富的能源资源和可持续增长是世界经济的巨大要求。本文分析了环境库兹涅茨曲线(EKC)假说,针对“一带一路”倡议(BRI)经济体,认为大型项目是 BRI 的一个属性,会对生态造成损害。本研究利用 1981 年至 2016 年的新数据信息,考虑了异质性和横截面依赖性等特殊因素。计算结果表明,均值组估计量为每一个地区都提供了强有力的证据,支持 EKC 假说的存在。长期影响由 pooled mean group estimators 进行衡量,在每一个地区都显示出显著的结果;此外,EKC 假说在长期内得到了证实,特别是在发达经济体。大型项目,如“一带一路”倡议,需要大量的能源来有效地完成所包含的项目。碳排放和能源消耗之间的正相关关系使各国政府感到困扰,它们需要制定政策来限制碳排放的规模,并控制能源使用,以使其环境回到原始状态。接下来,评估结果为国家管理部门提供了密集的建议,以严格的水平优势、垃圾管理运动、可再生能源依赖和为净化空气而采取的有利判断为重点。

相似文献

1
Testing EKC hypothesis with energy and sustainable development challenges: a fresh evidence from belt and road initiative economies.检验能源和可持续发展挑战下的 EKC 假说:来自“一带一路”倡议经济体的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Nov;25(32):32066-32080. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3052-5. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
2
The role of fixed capital formation, renewable and non-renewable energy in economic growth and carbon emission: a case study of Belt and Road Initiative project.固定资本形成、可再生和不可再生能源在经济增长和碳排放中的作用:以“一带一路”倡议项目为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Dec;27(36):45476-45486. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10413-y. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
3
Roles of natural resources, globalization, and technological innovations in mitigation of environmental degradation in BRI economies.自然资源、全球化和技术创新在缓解“一带一路”经济体环境退化方面的作用。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 24;17(6):e0265755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265755. eCollection 2022.
4
The nexus of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption, trade openness, and CO emissions in the framework of EKC: evidence from emerging economies.在 EKC 框架下的可再生能源和不可再生能源消费、贸易开放度和二氧化碳排放的关系:来自新兴经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 May;26(15):15162-15173. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04912-w. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
5
Does energy innovation play a role in achieving sustainable development goals in BRICS countries?金砖国家的能源创新在实现可持续发展目标方面发挥作用了吗?
Environ Technol. 2022 Jun;43(15):2290-2299. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2021.1874542. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
6
Nexus between biomass energy, economic growth, and ecological footprints: empirical investigation from belt and road initiative economies.生物质能、经济增长与生态足迹的关联:“一带一路”倡议经济体的实证研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Nov;30(54):115527-115542. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30481-0. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
7
The role of technology innovation and people's connectivity in testing environmental Kuznets curve and pollution heaven hypotheses across the Belt and Road host countries: new evidence from Method of Moments Quantile Regression.技术创新和人员互联互通在“一带一路”沿线国家检验环境库兹涅茨曲线和污染天堂假说中的作用:矩量分位数回归方法的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(5):5254-5270. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10775-3. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
8
Does excessive energy utilization and expansion of urbanization increase carbon dioxide emission in Belt and Road economies?一带一路经济体中能源的过度利用和城市化扩张会增加二氧化碳排放吗?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(21):60080-60105. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26701-2. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
9
The nexus between financial development, globalization, and environmental degradation: Fresh evidence from Central and Eastern European Countries.金融发展、全球化与环境恶化之间的关系:来自中东欧国家的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Aug;26(24):24733-24747. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05714-w. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
10
The Dynamic Impact of Natural Resource Rents, Financial Development, and Technological Innovations on Environmental Quality: Empirical Evidence from BRI Economies.自然资源租金、金融发展和技术创新对环境质量的动态影响:来自“一带一路”经济体的经验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;19(1):130. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010130.

引用本文的文献

1
Urban Management in the Dynamic Relationship between the Occurrence of Environmental Pollution Accidents and Economic Development in China.中国环境污染事故发生与经济发展的动态关系中的城市管理。
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Aug 28;2022:3751028. doi: 10.1155/2022/3751028. eCollection 2022.
2
Sanitation, water, energy use, and traffic volume affect environmental quality: Go-for-green developmental policies.卫生、水、能源使用和交通量影响环境质量:绿色发展政策。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 26;17(8):e0271017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271017. eCollection 2022.
3
Environmental concerns of financial inclusion and economic policy uncertainty in the era of globalization: evidence from low & high globalized OECD economies.

本文引用的文献

1
Does finance affect environmental degradation: evidence from One Belt and One Road Initiative region?金融是否会影响环境恶化:来自“一带一路”倡议地区的证据?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Apr;25(10):9579-9592. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1317-7. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
全球化时代金融包容性和经济政策不确定性的环境问题:来自低&高全球化 OECD 经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(24):36773-36787. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18758-2. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
4
The effect of technological innovation, FDI, and financial development on CO2 emission: evidence from the G8 countries.技术创新、外国直接投资和金融发展对二氧化碳排放的影响:来自八国集团国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(8):11654-11662. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15993-x. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
5
Environmental protection in selected one belt one road economies through institutional quality: Prospering transportation and industrialization.通过制度质量实现“一带一路”经济体的环境保护:促进交通和工业化。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 14;16(1):e0240851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240851. eCollection 2021.
6
Towards Achieving Sustainable Development: Role of Technology Innovation, Technology Adoption and CO Emission for BRICS.迈向可持续发展:金砖国家技术创新、技术采纳和 CO 排放的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 1;18(1):277. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010277.
7
How agriculture, manufacture, and urbanization induced carbon emission? The case of Indonesia.农业、制造业和城市化如何导致碳排放?以印度尼西亚为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Nov;27(33):42092-42103. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10148-w. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
8
The effects of FDI, technological innovation, and financial development on CO emissions: evidence from the BRICS countries.FDI、技术创新和金融发展对 CO 排放的影响:来自金砖国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jul;27(19):23899-23913. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08715-2. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
9
Exploring the impact of innovation, renewable energy consumption, and income on CO2 emissions: new evidence from the BRICS economies.探讨创新、可再生能源消费和收入对二氧化碳排放的影响:来自金砖国家经济体的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(12):13866-13881. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07876-4. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
10
Impact of financial development on CO emissions: A comparative analysis of developing countries (D) and developed countries (G).金融发展对二氧化碳排放的影响:发展中国家(D)和发达国家(G)的比较分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(11):12461-12475. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06680-z. Epub 2020 Jan 29.