• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Outcome of minimally invasive liver resection for extrapancreatic biliary malignancies: A single-institutional experience.胰外胆管恶性肿瘤的微创肝切除术结果:单机构经验
J Minim Access Surg. 2021 Jan-Mar;17(1):69-75. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_247_19.
2
Minimally invasive versus open right anterior sectionectomy and central hepatectomy for central liver malignancies: a propensity-score-matched analysis.微创与开放右前叶切除术及中央肝切除术治疗中央型肝脏恶性肿瘤:一项倾向评分匹配分析
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Apr;91(4):E174-E182. doi: 10.1111/ans.16719. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
3
Changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally invasive hepatectomy: a contemporary single-institution experience with 400 consecutive resections.微创肝切除术应用相关的变化趋势和结果:单中心 400 例连续切除术的当代经验
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4658-4665. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6310-1. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
4
Minimally invasive approaches to extrapancreatic cholangiocarcinoma.胰外胆管癌的微创治疗方法。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Feb;27(2):406-14. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2489-8. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
5
Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more.单机构300例微创肝切除术的评估:少即是多。
Ann Surg. 2007 Sep;246(3):385-92; discussion 392-4. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318146996c.
6
Impact of liver cirrhosis on the difficulty of minimally-invasive liver resections: a 1:1 coarsened exact-matched controlled study.肝硬化对微创肝切除术难度的影响:1:1 粗糙精确匹配对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):5231-5238. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08018-0. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
7
Impact of non-liver-related previous abdominal surgery on the difficulty of minimally invasive liver resections: a propensity score-matched controlled study.非肝脏相关既往腹部手术对微创肝切除术难度的影响:一项倾向评分匹配对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):591-597. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08321-4. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
8
A chronological review of 500 minimally invasive liver resections in a North American institution: overcoming stagnation and toward consolidation.北美一家机构 500 例微创肝切除术的时间序列回顾:克服停滞,走向巩固。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):6144-6152. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09182-1. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
9
Comparison between short and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open primary liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma: A 1:1 matched analysis.微创与开腹原发性肝癌肝切除术近期与远期疗效比较:1:1 匹配分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;124(4):560-571. doi: 10.1002/jso.26556. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
10
Italian experience in minimally invasive liver surgery: a national survey.意大利微创肝脏手术经验:一项全国性调查。
Updates Surg. 2015 Jun;67(2):129-40. doi: 10.1007/s13304-015-0307-2. Epub 2015 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Surgical Strategies for Alveolar Echinococcosis of the Liver.肝泡型包虫病的微创外科治疗策略
Visc Med. 2025 Apr 3:1-8. doi: 10.1159/000545413.
2
New trends in diagnosis and management of gallbladder carcinoma.胆囊癌诊断与治疗的新趋势
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Jan 15;16(1):13-29. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i1.13.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally invasive major hepatectomies: a Southeast Asian single institution contemporary experience with its first 120 consecutive cases.微创大肝切除术:东南亚单机构连续120例的当代经验
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Apr;90(4):553-557. doi: 10.1111/ans.15563. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
2
Changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally invasive pancreatic surgeries: A single institution experience with 150 consecutive procedures in Southeast Asia.与采用微创胰腺手术相关的趋势和结果变化:东南亚一家机构连续150例手术的经验
J Minim Access Surg. 2020 Oct-Dec;16(4):404-410. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_127_19.
3
Initial single institution experience with robotic biliary surgery and bilio-enteric anastomosis in southeast Asia.东南亚地区机器人辅助胆道手术及胆肠吻合术的单机构初步经验。
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Apr;89(4):E142-E146. doi: 10.1111/ans.15135. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
4
Liver resection for extra-pancreatic biliary cancer: what is the role of laparoscopic approach?腹腔镜技术在胰外胆管癌肝切除术中的作用
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3711-3717. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06664-7. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
5
Changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally invasive hepatectomy: a contemporary single-institution experience with 400 consecutive resections.微创肝切除术应用相关的变化趋势和结果:单中心 400 例连续切除术的当代经验
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4658-4665. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6310-1. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
6
Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open hepatectomy.机器人辅助肝切除术与开放性肝切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Mar;89(3):165-170. doi: 10.1111/ans.14690. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
7
Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for patients presenting with suspected gallbladder cancer: Report of 8 cases.疑似胆囊癌患者微创手术的短期结果:8例报告
J Minim Access Surg. 2019 Apr-Jun;15(2):109-114. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_229_17.
8
Laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝肿瘤的比较:一项基于个体患者数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2018 May;163(5):985-995. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.01.020. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
9
Initial experience with robotic hepatectomy in Singapore: analysis of 48 resections in 43 consecutive patients.新加坡机器人肝切除术的初步经验:对43例连续患者的48例切除术的分析
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Mar;89(3):201-205. doi: 10.1111/ans.14417. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
10
Survey Results of the Expert Meeting on Laparoscopic Surgery for Gallbladder Cancer and a Review of Relevant Literature.胆囊癌腹腔镜手术专家会议调查结果及相关文献综述
Dig Surg. 2019;36(1):7-12. doi: 10.1159/000486208. Epub 2018 Jan 16.

胰外胆管恶性肿瘤的微创肝切除术结果:单机构经验

Outcome of minimally invasive liver resection for extrapancreatic biliary malignancies: A single-institutional experience.

作者信息

Chin Ken Min, Chua Darren W Q, Lee Ser Yee, Chan Chung Yip, Goh Brian K P

机构信息

Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital; Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

出版信息

J Minim Access Surg. 2021 Jan-Mar;17(1):69-75. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_247_19.

DOI:10.4103/jmas.JMAS_247_19
PMID:31997786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7945651/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) has been increasingly adopted over the past decade, and its application has been expanded to the management of extrapancreatic biliary malignancies (EPBMs). We aimed to evaluate the peri- and post-operative outcome of patients undergoing MILR for suspected EPMB.

METHODS

Forty-four consecutive patients who underwent MILR with a curative intent for EPBM at Singapore General Hospital between 2011 and 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained surgical database. Clinical and operative data were analysed and compared to provide information and make comparisons on peri- and post-operative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 26, 5 and 13 patients underwent MILR for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) and gallbladder carcinoma (GBCA), respectively. Six major hepatectomies were performed, of which one was laparoscopic assisted and another was robot assisted. Ten patients underwent posterosuperior segmentectomies. There was one open conversion. The mean operative time was 266.5 min, and the mean blood loss was 379 ml. The mean length of hospital stay was 4.7 days with no incidences of 30- and 90-day mortality. The rate of recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 75% (at least 12-month follow-up). There was a significantly higher rate of robot-assisted procedures in patients undergoing MILR for GBCA/PHC as compared to ICC (P = 0.034). Patients undergoing posterosuperior segmentectomies required longer operative time (P = 0.018) with an increased need for (P = 0.001) and duration of (P = 0.025) Pringles manoeuvre. There were no differences in operative time, blood loss, morbidity, mortality or RFS between the above groups.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive surgery can be adopted safely with a low open conversion rate for EPBMs.

摘要

背景

在过去十年中,微创肝切除术(MILR)的应用越来越广泛,其应用范围已扩展到胰外胆管恶性肿瘤(EPBMs)的治疗。我们旨在评估疑似EPMB患者接受MILR的围手术期和术后结局。

方法

从一个前瞻性维护的手术数据库中识别出2011年至2018年期间在新加坡总医院接受MILR治疗EPBM且具有治愈意图的44例连续患者。分析并比较临床和手术数据,以提供围手术期和术后结局的信息并进行比较。

结果

分别有26例、5例和13例患者接受了MILR治疗肝内胆管癌(ICC)、肝门部胆管癌(PHC)和胆囊癌(GBCA)。进行了6例大肝切除术,其中1例为腹腔镜辅助,另1例为机器人辅助。10例患者接受了后上段切除术。有1例转为开放手术。平均手术时间为266.5分钟,平均失血量为379毫升。平均住院时间为4.7天,无30天和90天死亡率。无复发生存率(RFS)为75%(至少随访12个月)。与ICC患者相比,接受MILR治疗GBCA/PHC的患者机器人辅助手术的比例明显更高(P = 0.034)。接受后上段切除术的患者手术时间更长(P = 0.018),Pringles手法的使用需求增加(P = 0.001)且持续时间延长(P = 0.025)。上述组之间在手术时间、失血量、发病率、死亡率或RFS方面无差异。

结论

对于EPBMs,微创外科手术可以安全采用,开放转换率低。