Llorens Anaïs, Funderud Ingrid, Blenkmann Alejandro O, Lubell James, Foldal Maja, Leske Sabine, Huster Rene, Meling Torstein R, Knight Robert T, Solbakk Anne-Kristin, Endestad Tor
Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Jan 8;13:445. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00445. eCollection 2019.
Orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is implicated in multiple cognitive processes, including inhibitory control, context memory, recency judgment, and choice behavior. Despite an emerging understanding of the role of OFC in memory and executive control, its necessity for core working memory (WM) operations remains undefined. Here, we assessed the impact of OFC damage on interference effects in WM using a Recent Probes task based on the Sternberg item-recognition task (1966). Subjects were asked to memorize a set of letters and then indicate whether a probe letter was presented in a particular set. Four conditions were created according to the forthcoming response ("yes"/"no") and the recency of the probe (presented in the previous trial set or not). We compared behavioral and electroencephalography (EEG) responses between healthy subjects ( = 14) and patients with bilateral OFC damage ( = 14). Both groups had the same recency pattern of slower reaction time (RT) when the probe was presented in the previous trial but not in the current one, reflecting the proactive interference (PI). The within-group electrophysiological results showed no condition difference during letter encoding and maintenance. In contrast, event-related potentials (ERPs) to probes showed distinct within-group condition effects, and condition by group effects. The response and recency effects for controls occurred within the same time window (300-500 ms after probe onset) and were observed in two distinct spatial groups including right centro-posterior and left frontal electrodes. Both clusters showed ERP differences elicited by the response effect, and one cluster was also sensitive to the recency manipulation. Condition differences for the OFC group involved two different clusters, encompassing only left hemisphere electrodes and occurring during two consecutive time windows (345-463 ms and 565-710 ms). Both clusters were sensitive to the response effect, but no recency effect was found despite the behavioral recency effect. Although the groups had different electrophysiological responses, the maintenance of letters in WM, the evaluation of the context of the probe, and the decision to accept or reject a probed letter were preserved in OFC patients. The results suggest that neural reorganization may contribute to intact recency judgment and response after OFC damage.
眶额皮质(OFC)参与多种认知过程,包括抑制控制、情境记忆、新近性判断和选择行为。尽管对OFC在记忆和执行控制中的作用有了新的认识,但其对核心工作记忆(WM)操作的必要性仍不明确。在这里,我们使用基于斯特恩伯格项目识别任务(1966年)的新近探测任务,评估了OFC损伤对WM中干扰效应的影响。受试者被要求记住一组字母,然后指出一个探测字母是否出现在特定组中。根据即将到来的反应(“是”/“否”)和探测的新近性(是否出现在前一组试验中)创建了四种条件。我们比较了健康受试者(n = 14)和双侧OFC损伤患者(n = 14)之间的行为和脑电图(EEG)反应。当探测字母出现在前一组试验中但不在当前试验中时,两组都有相同的新近性模式,即反应时间(RT)较慢,这反映了前摄干扰(PI)。组内电生理结果显示,在字母编码和维持过程中没有条件差异。相比之下,对探测字母的事件相关电位(ERP)显示出明显的组内条件效应和组间条件效应。对照组的反应和新近性效应出现在同一时间窗口(探测开始后300 - 500毫秒),并且在包括右中央后和左额叶电极的两个不同空间组中观察到。两个簇都显示出由反应效应引起的ERP差异,并且一个簇对新近性操作也敏感。OFC组的条件差异涉及两个不同的簇,仅包括左半球电极,并且发生在两个连续的时间窗口(345 - 463毫秒和565 - 710毫秒)。两个簇都对反应效应敏感,尽管有行为新近性效应,但未发现新近性效应。尽管两组有不同的电生理反应,但WM中字母的维持、探测情境的评估以及接受或拒绝探测字母的决定在OFC患者中得以保留。结果表明,神经重组可能有助于OFC损伤后完整的新近性判断和反应。