Kotloski Robert J, Rutecki Paul A, Sutula Thomas P
Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, United States.
Department of Neurology, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, United States.
Front Neurol. 2020 Jan 10;10:1286. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01286. eCollection 2019.
We hypothesized that the acute response to traumatic brain injury (TBI) shares mechanisms with brain plasticity in the kindling model. Utilizing two unique, complementary strains of inbred rats, selected to be either susceptible or resistant to seizure-induced plasticity evoked by kindling of the perforant path, we examined acute electrophysiological alterations and differences in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) protein concentrations after a moderate-to-severe brain injury. At baseline, limited strain-dependent differences in acute electrophysiological activity were found, and no differences in BDNF. Following injury, pronounced strain-dependent differences in electrophysiologic activity were noted at 0.5 min. However, the divergence is transient, with diminished differences at 5 min after injury and no differences at 10 and 15 min after injury. Strain-specific differences in BDNF protein concentration were noted 4 h after injury. A simple risk score model generated by machine learning and based solely on post-injury electrophysiologic activity at the 0.5-min timepoint distinguished perforant path kindling susceptible (PPKS) rats from non-plasticity-susceptible strains. The findings demonstrate that genetic background which affects brain circuit plasticity also affects acute response to TBI. An improved understanding of the effect of genetic background on the cellular, molecular, and circuit plasticity mechanisms activated in response to TBI and their timecourse is key in developing much-needed novel therapeutic approaches.
我们推测,创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的急性反应与点燃模型中的脑可塑性具有共同机制。利用两种独特的、互补的近交系大鼠,它们被选择为对由穿通通路点燃诱发的癫痫发作诱导可塑性敏感或抗性,我们研究了中度至重度脑损伤后急性电生理改变以及脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)蛋白浓度的差异。在基线时,发现急性电生理活动存在有限的品系依赖性差异,而BDNF无差异。损伤后,在0.5分钟时观察到明显的电生理活动品系依赖性差异。然而,这种差异是短暂的,在损伤后5分钟时差异减小,在损伤后10分钟和15分钟时无差异。在损伤后4小时观察到BDNF蛋白浓度的品系特异性差异。由机器学习生成的、仅基于损伤后0.5分钟时间点的电生理活动的简单风险评分模型能够区分穿通通路点燃敏感(PPKS)大鼠和非可塑性敏感品系。这些发现表明,影响脑回路可塑性的遗传背景也会影响对TBI的急性反应。更好地理解遗传背景对响应TBI激活的细胞、分子和回路可塑性机制的影响及其时间进程,是开发急需的新型治疗方法的关键。