Behavioral Biology Branch, 8394Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Psychol Rep. 2021 Feb;124(1):210-226. doi: 10.1177/0033294119899896. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
Individuals vary in response to sleep loss: some individuals are "vulnerable" and demonstrate cognitive decrements following insufficient sleep, while others are "resistant" and maintain baseline cognitive capability. Physiological markers (e.g., genetic polymorphisms) have been identified that can predict relative vulnerability. However, a quick, cost-effective, and feasible subjective predictor tool has not been developed. The objective of the present study was to determine whether two factors-"subjective sleep need" and "subjective resilience"-predict cognitive performance following sleep deprivation.
Twenty-seven healthy, sleep-satiated young adults participated. These individuals were screened for sleep disorders, comorbidities, and erratic sleep schedules. Prior to 40 hours of in-laboratory total sleep deprivation, participants were questioned on their subjective sleep need and completed a validated resilience scale. During and after sleep deprivation, participants completed a 5-minute psychomotor vigilance test every 2 hours.
Both subjective resilience and subjective sleep need individually failed to predict performance during sleep loss. However, these two measures interacted to predict performance. Individuals with low resilience and low sleep need had poorer cognitive performance during sleep loss. However, in individuals with medium or high resilience, psychomotor vigilance test performance was not predicted by subjective sleep need. Higher resilience may be protective against sleep loss-related neurobehavioral impairments in the context of subjective sleep need.
Following sleep loss (and recovery sleep), trait resilient individuals may outperform those with lower resiliency on real-world tasks that require continuous attention. Future studies should determine whether the present findings generalize to other, operationally relevant tasks and additional cognitive domains.
个体对睡眠不足的反应存在差异:一些个体是“易损的”,在睡眠不足后表现出认知能力下降,而另一些个体是“抵抗的”,能够保持基线认知能力。已经确定了一些生理标志物(例如,遗传多态性)可以预测相对易损性。然而,尚未开发出一种快速、经济且可行的主观预测工具。本研究的目的是确定两个因素——“主观睡眠需求”和“主观恢复力”——是否可以预测睡眠剥夺后的认知表现。
共有 27 名健康、睡眠充足的年轻成年人参与了研究。这些个体接受了睡眠障碍、合并症和不规则睡眠时间表的筛查。在 40 小时的实验室完全睡眠剥夺之前,参与者被问及他们的主观睡眠需求,并完成了一项经过验证的恢复力量表。在睡眠剥夺期间和之后,参与者每 2 小时完成一次 5 分钟的精神运动警觉性测试。
主观恢复力和主观睡眠需求单独都无法预测睡眠剥夺期间的表现。然而,这两个测量指标相互作用,共同预测表现。主观恢复力和主观睡眠需求都较低的个体在睡眠剥夺期间的认知表现较差。然而,在主观恢复力中等或较高的个体中,精神运动警觉性测试的表现不受主观睡眠需求的预测。较高的恢复力可能在主观睡眠需求的背景下对与睡眠不足相关的神经行为损伤具有保护作用。
在睡眠剥夺(和恢复性睡眠)后,特质恢复力强的个体在需要持续注意力的现实世界任务中可能表现优于恢复力较低的个体。未来的研究应确定本研究结果是否适用于其他操作性相关任务和认知领域。