• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚手术伤口感染的预测因素:一项全国性研究。

Predictors of surgical wound infection in Australia: a national study.

作者信息

McLaws M L, Irwig L M, Mock P, Berry G, Gold J

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Sydney, NSW.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 1988;149(11-12):591-5. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1988.tb120796.x.

DOI:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1988.tb120796.x
PMID:3200182
Abstract

In July 1984, the first national Australian Nosocomial Prevalence Survey collected data on 12,742 surgical patients from 265 hospitals. This sample represented 59% of public and private hospitals with 50 or more acute-care beds in Australia. The infection control officers at each hospital provided data on patients in a random sample of beds. The over-all surgical wound infection rate was 4.6%. The surgical wound infection rate was twice (5.4%) as high in public than in private (2.8%) hospitals. The infection rates were greater in larger hospitals in both the public and private sector. However, after adjusting for the other predictor factors that are noted below the infection rate did not show any particular pattern for the size of hospital. Clean surgery had a higher (4.8%) infection rate than did clean-contaminated surgery (2.9%). The infection rate for contaminated surgery was 15.0%. Men were found to have nearly twice (6.5%) the infection rate of women (3.4%). Infection rates were lowest in the 15-to-34 years' age-group and highest in those of over 55 years of age. These trends remained even after adjusting for the other risk factors for infection. The cost of surgical wound infections for all hospitals during the year of 1984 was estimated at approximately $60 million. We suggest that a concerted effort should be made to attempt to reduce the infection rate for clean surgery to 1% or less.

摘要

1984年7月,澳大利亚首次全国医院感染现患率调查收集了来自265家医院的12742名外科患者的数据。该样本占澳大利亚拥有50张及以上急症护理床位的公立和私立医院的59%。每家医院的感染控制人员提供了随机抽取床位患者的数据。总体手术伤口感染率为4.6%。公立(5.4%)医院的手术伤口感染率是私立(2.8%)医院的两倍。公立和私立部门中,规模较大的医院感染率更高。然而,在对下文提到的其他预测因素进行调整后,感染率并未呈现出与医院规模相关的特定模式。清洁手术的感染率(4.8%)高于清洁-污染手术(2.9%)。污染手术的感染率为15.0%。发现男性的感染率(6.5%)几乎是女性(3.4%)的两倍。感染率在15至34岁年龄组中最低,在55岁以上人群中最高。即使在对其他感染风险因素进行调整后,这些趋势仍然存在。1984年所有医院手术伤口感染的成本估计约为6000万美元。我们建议应齐心协力将清洁手术的感染率降至1%或更低。

相似文献

1
Predictors of surgical wound infection in Australia: a national study.澳大利亚手术伤口感染的预测因素:一项全国性研究。
Med J Aust. 1988;149(11-12):591-5. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1988.tb120796.x.
2
The prevalence of nosocomial and community-acquired infections in Australian hospitals.澳大利亚医院中院内感染和社区获得性感染的患病率。
Med J Aust. 1988;149(11-12):582-90. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1988.tb120795.x.
3
Wound infection in Tikur Anbessa hospital, surgical department.提古儿安贝萨医院外科的伤口感染情况。
Ethiop Med J. 2005 Jul;43(3):167-74.
4
[Nosocomial infections in Germany--assessment and prevention. NIDEP Study, 1: On prevalence in surgery].[德国的医院感染——评估与预防。NIDEP研究,1:外科手术中的患病率]
Chirurg. 1996 Jun;67(6):637-42.
5
Rate of wound infection after clean surgery.清洁手术后的伤口感染率。
Saudi Med J. 2001 Jan;22(1):58-60.
6
Surgical wound morbidity in an austere surgical environment.严峻手术环境下的手术伤口发病率
Mil Med. 2000 Jan;165(1):13-7.
7
Decreasing the incidence of surgical wound infections. Validation of a surveillance-notification program.
Arch Surg. 1986 Apr;121(4):458-61. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400040096015.
8
Methodologies used in surveillance of surgical wound infections and bacteremia in Australian hospitals.澳大利亚医院中用于监测手术伤口感染和菌血症的方法。
Am J Infect Control. 1999 Dec;27(6):474-81. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(99)70024-6.
9
Surgical Site Infections in Emergency Abdominal Surgery at Tamale Teaching Hospital, Ghana.加纳塔马利教学医院急诊腹部手术中的手术部位感染
World J Surg. 2018 Apr;42(4):916-922. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4241-y.
10
Establishing thresholds for adverse patient outcomes.确定患者不良结局的阈值。
Int J Qual Health Care. 1996 Jun;8(3):223-30. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/8.3.223.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence and Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infections Following Emergency Laparotomies: A Prospective Observational Study.急诊剖腹手术后手术部位感染的发生率及危险因素:一项前瞻性观察研究
Cureus. 2025 Mar 9;17(3):e80283. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80283. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Is antibiotic prophylaxis generally safe and effective in surgical and nonsurgical scenarios? Evidence from an umbrella review of randomized controlled trials.抗生素预防在手术和非手术情况下通常安全有效吗?来自随机对照试验伞式评价的证据。
Int J Surg. 2024 Feb 1;110(2):1224-1233. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000923.
3
Determining risk factors for surgical wound dehiscence: a literature review.
确定手术伤口裂开的风险因素:一项文献综述
Int Wound J. 2015 Jun;12(3):265-75. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12088. Epub 2013 May 21.
4
Prevalence studies in nosocomial infections.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Feb;11(2):95-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01967059.