• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全膝关节置换术中夹闭引流相较于持续引流的优势。

Advantages of clamping and drainage over continuous drainage in a total knee arthroplasty.

作者信息

Agarwala Sanjay, Jhaveri Maulik, Menon Aditya

机构信息

P D Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Veer Savarkar Marg, Mahim (West), Mumbai, 400016, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jan-Feb;11(1):133-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.03.013. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcot.2019.03.013
PMID:32002001
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6985007/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The use of closed-suction drainage systems after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is common practice in India, but with no consensus on its use. In this retrospective study, we compared whether clamped or unclamped drainage has any advantages over the other in unilateral TKA.

METHODS

Group-A (n = 351) had an unclamped drain removed at 24 h postoperative, with measurement of total drainage at 24 h between January 2011 and February 2013. Group B (n = 349) had drains kept for a total of 8 h-clamped for the first 4 h and unclamped for a further 4, between March 2013 to September 2016. Drainage volume, as well as the hemodynamic markers-hemoglobin (Hb) drop, transfusion rate were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean drain output in Group- A was significantly higher than Group- B (215.64 ml versus 28.34 ml). The postoperative Hb was significantly higher in Group-B (11.46 g/dl versus 10.57 g/dl). Mean Hb drop was significantly higher in Group A (2.16  g/dl versus 1.18 g/dl). The transfusion rates were lower in Group-B, though not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The 4- hour clamping method effectively reduces drain output and fall in hemoglobin. For those who continue using closed suction drains, clamping could prove to be an effective way of reducing post-operative blood loss and the need for transfusions.

摘要

引言

在印度,全膝关节置换术(TKA)后使用闭式吸引引流系统是一种常见做法,但对于其使用尚无共识。在这项回顾性研究中,我们比较了在单侧全膝关节置换术中,夹闭引流与未夹闭引流相比是否具有任何优势。

方法

A组(n = 351)在术后24小时拔除未夹闭的引流管,并于2011年1月至2013年2月期间测量24小时的总引流量。B组(n = 349)在2013年3月至2016年9月期间,引流管总共保留8小时,前4小时夹闭,后4小时不夹闭。评估引流量以及血流动力学指标——血红蛋白(Hb)下降情况、输血率。

结果

A组的平均引流量显著高于B组(215.64毫升对28.34毫升)。B组术后血红蛋白水平显著更高(11.46克/分升对10.57克/分升)。A组的平均血红蛋白下降幅度显著更大(2.16克/分升对1.18克/分升)。B组的输血率较低,尽管无统计学意义。

结论

4小时夹闭法可有效减少引流量和血红蛋白下降。对于继续使用闭式吸引引流管的患者,夹闭可能是减少术后失血和输血需求的有效方法。

相似文献

1
Advantages of clamping and drainage over continuous drainage in a total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术中夹闭引流相较于持续引流的优势。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jan-Feb;11(1):133-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.03.013. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
2
The comparison of the effects of intraoperative bleeding control and postoperative drain clamping methods on the postoperative blood loss and the need for transfusion following total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术中出血控制及术后引流管夹闭方法对术后失血量及输血需求的影响比较
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2011;45(3):190-4. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2011.2398.
3
Three-hour interval drain clamping reduces postoperative bleeding in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.三小时间隔夹管减少全膝关节置换术后出血:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012 Jul;132(7):1059-63. doi: 10.1007/s00402-012-1501-z. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
4
The optimal protocol to reduce blood loss and blood transfusion after unilateral total knee replacement: Low-dose IA-TXA plus 30-min drain clamping versus drainage clamping for the first 3 h without IA-TXA.减少单侧全膝关节置换术后失血和输血的最佳方案:低剂量关节内注射氨甲环酸加30分钟引流管夹闭与不使用关节内注射氨甲环酸的情况下最初3小时引流管夹闭。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017 Sep-Dec;25(3):2309499017731626. doi: 10.1177/2309499017731626.
5
Optimal release timing of temporary drain clamping after total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后临时夹闭引流管的最佳时机
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Mar 21;12(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0550-y.
6
Temporary 12-Hour Drain Clamping versus 3-Hour Drain Clamping in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty.同期双侧全膝关节置换术中临时 12 小时夹管与 3 小时夹管的比较。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Jun;15(3):418-424. doi: 10.4055/cios22049. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
7
Temporary clamping of drain combined with tranexamic acid reduce blood loss after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.引流管临时夹闭联合氨甲环酸减少全膝关节置换术后失血:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Jul 20;13:124. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-124.
8
Translating evidence-based protocol of wound drain management for total joint arthroplasty into practice: A quasi-experimental study.将全关节置换术伤口引流管理的循证方案付诸实践:一项准实验研究。
Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2016 May;21:49-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijotn.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
9
Clamping drainage is unnecessary after minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty in patients with tranexamic acid: A randomized, controlled trial.氨甲环酸用于微创全膝关节置换术患者时无需夹闭引流:一项随机对照试验
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Feb;96(7):e5804. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005804.
10
Does Not Use of Closed Suction Drainage in Total Knee Arthroplasty with Tranexamic Acid Reduce Blood Loss?氨甲环酸在全膝关节置换术中不使用闭管引流是否会减少失血?
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2020 Oct 31;22(5):339-346. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0014.4224.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporary 12-Hour Drain Clamping versus 3-Hour Drain Clamping in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty.同期双侧全膝关节置换术中临时 12 小时夹管与 3 小时夹管的比较。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Jun;15(3):418-424. doi: 10.4055/cios22049. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
2
Safety and efficacy of sequential simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A single centre retrospective cohort study.序贯同步双侧全膝关节置换术的安全性与有效性:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jul;11(Suppl 4):S636-S644. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 May 18.
3
Decreasing hospital length of stay and enhancing recovery in Total Knee Arthroplasty.缩短全膝关节置换术的住院时间并促进康复。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jan-Feb;11(1):122-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 May 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Concealed cosmetic closure in total knee replacement surgery - A prospective audit assessing appearance and patient satisfaction.全膝关节置换手术中的隐蔽美容缝合——一项评估外观及患者满意度的前瞻性审计
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 Jan-Feb;10(1):111-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
2
Non-continuous versus continuous wound drainage after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.全膝关节置换术后间断与持续引流的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2014 Feb;38(2):361-71. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2105-0. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
3
Updated strategies to treat acute arterial complications associated with total knee and hip arthroplasty.更新的策略来治疗全膝关节和髋关节置换术相关的急性动脉并发症。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Oct;58(4):1037-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.04.035. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
4
Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss and blood transfusion after TKA: a prospective randomized controlled trial.氨甲环酸减少 TKA 后的失血和输血:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Oct;469(10):2874-80. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1874-2. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
5
A prospective comparison of clamping the drain or post-operative salvage of blood in reducing blood loss after total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后夹闭引流管或术后血液回输在减少失血方面的前瞻性比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Jan;88(1):49-53. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B1.16653.
6
Comparison between 4-hour clamping drainage and nonclamping drainage after total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后4小时夹管引流与非夹管引流的比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2005 Oct;20(7):909-13. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.01.017.
7
Comparison between two methods of drain clamping after total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后两种引流管夹闭方法的比较。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005 Jul;125(6):381-4. doi: 10.1007/s00402-005-0813-7. Epub 2005 May 19.
8
Closed suction drainage for hip and knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis.髋关节和膝关节置换术的闭式吸引引流。一项荟萃分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jun;86(6):1146-52. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200406000-00005.
9
The use of a closed-suction drain in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomised study.全膝关节置换术中闭式吸引引流管的应用。一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Mar;85(2):215-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.85b2.13357.
10
Does temporary clamping of drains following knee arthroplasty reduce blood loss? A randomised controlled trial.
Knee. 2001 Dec;8(4):325-7. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0160(01)00095-3.