Suppr超能文献

学习永不止步:高仿真模拟中的同伴教师评估。

Learning never stops: Evaluation of peer teachers in high fidelity simulation.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of South Carolina Aiken, Aiken, South Carolina.

College of Nursing University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.

出版信息

Nurs Forum. 2020 Jul;55(3):341-347. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12433. Epub 2020 Jan 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nurse educators have used peer teaching as a means of providing effective learning to peer learners and enhancing peer teachers' comfort with teaching. There is a lack of evidence related to providing feedback to peer teachers. Receiving feedback may enhance peer teachers' knowledge synthesis and understanding of the teaching process.

METHODS

We utilized a mixed methods approach to determine if an evaluation instrument was valid and helpful to peer teachers. Both peer learners and educators completed evaluations of peer teachers, which were then compared. After receiving summarized feedback, peer teachers completed a survey regarding their experience.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences between peer learner and educator ratings of peer teachers. Peer learners indicated they found peer teachers to be helpful in the high fidelity simulation setting. Peer teachers indicated satisfaction with the experience. Analysis of qualitative comments on peer-teacher surveys resulted in the identification of three themes: (a) validation of knowledge growth; (b) increased comfort with teaching; and (c) enhanced appreciation of teaching.

CONCLUSIONS

Peer teaching may enhance knowledge gain and synthesis for both peer teachers and peer learners. Enhanced comfort with teaching may lead to enhanced comfort in teaching both patients and peers in future practice.

摘要

背景

护士教育者已经将同伴教学作为向同伴学习者提供有效学习和提高同伴教师教学舒适度的一种手段。然而,在向同伴教师提供反馈方面,证据仍然不足。接受反馈可能会增强同伴教师对教学过程的知识综合理解。

方法

我们采用混合方法来确定评估工具对同伴教师是否有效和有帮助。同伴学习者和教育者都对同伴教师进行了评估,然后对评估结果进行了比较。在收到总结后的反馈后,同伴教师完成了一项关于他们体验的调查。

结果

同伴学习者和教育者对同伴教师的评价没有统计学差异。同伴学习者表示,在高保真模拟环境中,他们发现同伴教师很有帮助。同伴教师对这次经历表示满意。对同伴教师调查的定性评论进行分析后,确定了三个主题:(a)知识增长的验证;(b)教学舒适度的提高;(c)对教学的欣赏增强。

结论

同伴教学可能会提高同伴教师和同伴学习者的知识获取和综合能力。教学舒适度的提高可能会导致未来实践中在教学患者和同伴时更加舒适。

相似文献

1
Learning never stops: Evaluation of peer teachers in high fidelity simulation.
Nurs Forum. 2020 Jul;55(3):341-347. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12433. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
4
Moving nurse educators towards transcendence in simulation comfort.
Nurse Educ Pract. 2018 Jan;28:218-223. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2017.10.024. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
5
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
6
Peer Teaching in High-Fidelity Simulation: Participant Experiences and Reflections.
Nurse Educ. 2018 Nov/Dec;43(6):312-316. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000540.
7
Impact of peer teaching on nursing students: perceptions of learning environment, self-efficacy, and knowledge.
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Nov;33(11):1440-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.018. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
8
An analysis of clinical teacher behaviour in a nursing practicum in Taiwan.
J Clin Nurs. 2006 May;15(5):619-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01332.x.
9
Medical Students' Professional Development as Educators Revealed Through Reflections on Their Teaching Following a Students-as-Teachers Course.
Teach Learn Med. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):411-419. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1302801. Epub 2017 May 12.
10
Peer observation of teaching as a faculty development tool.
BMC Med Educ. 2012 May 4;12:26. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-26.

本文引用的文献

2
Peer Teaching in High-Fidelity Simulation: Participant Experiences and Reflections.
Nurse Educ. 2018 Nov/Dec;43(6):312-316. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000540.
3
The hidden curriculum in near-peer learning: An exploratory qualitative study.
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Mar;50:77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
4
How are we assessing near-peer teaching in undergraduate health professional education? A systematic review.
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Mar;50:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.004. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
6
The value of peer learning in undergraduate nursing education: a systematic review.
ISRN Nurs. 2013 Apr 3;2013:930901. doi: 10.1155/2013/930901. Print 2013.
7
Impact of peer teaching on nursing students: perceptions of learning environment, self-efficacy, and knowledge.
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Nov;33(11):1440-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.018. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
8
From novice to expert.
Am J Nurs. 1982 Mar;82(3):402-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验