Experimental Allergy Unit, IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Immunology and Allergology SSD, Ospedale S. Maria degli Angeli, Pordenone, Italy.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Nov;52(6):258-267. doi: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.135. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
The recent European Union and Italian regulations in the matter of in vivo test could strongly impact on current diagnostic approach, increasing the usage of in vitro tests in daily clinical practice. We evaluated 506 patients with both skin prick test and a microarray system (ImmunoCAP ISAC 112). The overall evaluation between ImmunoCAP ISAC SPT showed a moderate agreement (k=0.509, 95% C.I. 0.480-0.540, SE: 0.016) considering both aeroallergens and food allergens. When we considered the concordant results (double-positive plus double-negatives), the agreement ranged from 69% to 80% for pollen allergens, between 74% and 76% for dust mites, and between 74% and 93% for animal epithelia. In the case of food allergens, the accordance was pretty lower, accounting values ranging from 67% to 86%. ISAC testing identified from 22% to 26% more cases than SPTs in peach and nuts hyper-sensitivity. In 2.8% of the control group, the ISAC-test failed to detect an allergy sensitization caused by dust mite, shrimp, Anisakis, or seed storage proteins. Multiplex testing is more than a promising tool for more precise and comprehensive profiling of allergic patients and can be considered as a second-line approach, after the anamnesis, in the diagnosis of allergic diseases.
最近欧盟和意大利关于体内试验的规定可能会对当前的诊断方法产生重大影响,增加体外试验在日常临床实践中的使用。我们评估了 506 例进行皮肤点刺试验和微阵列系统(ImmunoCAP ISAC 112)的患者。ImmunoCAP ISAC SPT 之间的整体评估显示出中度一致性(k=0.509,95%置信区间为 0.480-0.540,SE:0.016),同时考虑了气传过敏原和食物过敏原。当我们考虑一致的结果(双阳性加双阴性)时,花粉过敏原的一致性范围在 69%至 80%之间,尘螨在 74%至 76%之间,动物上皮在 74%至 93%之间。在食物过敏原方面,一致性要低得多,占比从 67%到 86%不等。ISAC 测试比 SPT 多识别出 22%至 26%的桃和坚果过敏超敏反应病例。在 2.8%的对照组中,ISAC 测试未能检测到由尘螨、虾、Anisakis 或种子储存蛋白引起的过敏致敏。多重检测不仅仅是一种更精确和全面的过敏患者分析工具,而且可以被认为是一种二线方法,在病史之后,用于诊断过敏疾病。