• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较皮肤点刺试验和 ISAC 试验在过敏诊断中的性能。

Comparison of the performance of Skin Prick and ISAC Tests in the diagnosis of allergy.

机构信息

Experimental Allergy Unit, IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Immunology and Allergology SSD, Ospedale S. Maria degli Angeli, Pordenone, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Nov;52(6):258-267. doi: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.135. Epub 2020 Nov 3.

DOI:10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.135
PMID:32003553
Abstract

The recent European Union and Italian regulations in the matter of in vivo test could strongly impact on current diagnostic approach, increasing the usage of in vitro tests in daily clinical practice. We evaluated 506 patients with both skin prick test and a microarray system (ImmunoCAP ISAC 112). The overall evaluation between ImmunoCAP ISAC SPT showed a moderate agreement (k=0.509, 95% C.I. 0.480-0.540, SE: 0.016) considering both aeroallergens and food allergens. When we considered the concordant results (double-positive plus double-negatives), the agreement ranged from 69% to 80% for pollen allergens, between 74% and 76% for dust mites, and between 74% and 93% for animal epithelia. In the case of food allergens, the accordance was pretty lower, accounting values ranging from 67% to 86%. ISAC testing identified from 22% to 26% more cases than SPTs in peach and nuts hyper-sensitivity. In 2.8% of the control group, the ISAC-test failed to detect an allergy sensitization caused by dust mite, shrimp, Anisakis, or seed storage proteins. Multiplex testing is more than a promising tool for more precise and comprehensive profiling of allergic patients and can be considered as a second-line approach, after the anamnesis, in the diagnosis of allergic diseases.

摘要

最近欧盟和意大利关于体内试验的规定可能会对当前的诊断方法产生重大影响,增加体外试验在日常临床实践中的使用。我们评估了 506 例进行皮肤点刺试验和微阵列系统(ImmunoCAP ISAC 112)的患者。ImmunoCAP ISAC SPT 之间的整体评估显示出中度一致性(k=0.509,95%置信区间为 0.480-0.540,SE:0.016),同时考虑了气传过敏原和食物过敏原。当我们考虑一致的结果(双阳性加双阴性)时,花粉过敏原的一致性范围在 69%至 80%之间,尘螨在 74%至 76%之间,动物上皮在 74%至 93%之间。在食物过敏原方面,一致性要低得多,占比从 67%到 86%不等。ISAC 测试比 SPT 多识别出 22%至 26%的桃和坚果过敏超敏反应病例。在 2.8%的对照组中,ISAC 测试未能检测到由尘螨、虾、Anisakis 或种子储存蛋白引起的过敏致敏。多重检测不仅仅是一种更精确和全面的过敏患者分析工具,而且可以被认为是一种二线方法,在病史之后,用于诊断过敏疾病。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the performance of Skin Prick and ISAC Tests in the diagnosis of allergy.比较皮肤点刺试验和 ISAC 试验在过敏诊断中的性能。
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Nov;52(6):258-267. doi: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.135. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
2
Is Microarray Analysis Really Useful and Sufficient to Diagnose Nut Allergy in the Mediterranean Area?微阵列分析对于诊断地中海地区的坚果过敏真的有用吗且足够吗?
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2016;26(1):31-9.
3
Evaluation of a novel automated allergy microarray platform compared with three other allergy test methods.一种新型自动化过敏微阵列平台与其他三种过敏测试方法的比较评估。
Clin Exp Immunol. 2016 Apr;184(1):1-10. doi: 10.1111/cei.12721. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
4
The ImmunoCAP ISAC molecular allergology approach in adult multi-sensitized Italian patients with respiratory symptoms.意大利多敏成年呼吸道症状患者中 ImmunoCAP ISAC 分子过敏原检测方法的应用
Clin Biochem. 2011 Aug;44(12):1005-11. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.05.007. Epub 2011 May 19.
5
Comparison of the Performance of Skin Prick, ImmunoCAP, and ISAC Tests in the Diagnosis of Patients with Allergy.皮肤点刺试验、免疫CAP检测和ISAC检测在过敏患者诊断中的性能比较
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2017;172(4):215-223. doi: 10.1159/000464326. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
6
Can component-based microarray replace fluorescent enzimoimmunoassay in the diagnosis of grass and cypress pollen allergy?基于组件的微阵列能否替代荧光酶免疫分析在草和柏花粉过敏的诊断中?
Clin Exp Allergy. 2011 Oct;41(10):1440-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03818.x. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
7
Allergen chip diagnosis for soy-allergic patients: Gly m 4 as a marker for severe food-allergic reactions to soy.过敏原芯片诊断大豆过敏患者:Gly m 4 是大豆严重食物过敏反应的标志物。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2013;161(3):229-33. doi: 10.1159/000345970. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
8
Sensitization to common allergens and its association with allergic disorders at age 4 years: a whole population birth cohort study.4岁儿童对常见变应原的致敏作用及其与过敏性疾病的关联:一项全人群出生队列研究
Pediatrics. 2001 Aug;108(2):E33. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.2.e33.
9
Clinical utility of immunological methods based on the singleplex and multiplex ImmunoCap systems for diagnosis of shrimp allergy.基于单重和多重免疫捕获系统的免疫学方法在虾类过敏诊断中的临床应用。
J Int Med Res. 2021 Apr;49(4):3000605211006597. doi: 10.1177/03000605211006597.
10
Unraveling the Diagnosis of Kiwifruit Allergy: Usefulness of Current Diagnostic Tests.揭开猕猴桃过敏的诊断之谜:当前诊断测试的作用。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2022 Jun 20;32(3):206-212. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0691. Epub 2021 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Immunoglobulin-coating patterns reveal altered humoral responses to gut bacteria in pediatric cow milk allergies.免疫球蛋白包被模式揭示了小儿牛奶过敏中对肠道细菌的体液免疫反应的改变。
J Transl Med. 2024 Nov 12;22(1):1021. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05850-z.
2
360° approach to the patient with mite allergy: from scientific evidence to clinical practice.针对螨过敏患者的360°全方位方法:从科学证据到临床实践
Front Allergy. 2024 Feb 6;5:1298816. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2024.1298816. eCollection 2024.
3
Allergy screening with extract-based skin prick tests demonstrates higher sensitivity over in vitro molecular allergy testing.
基于提取物的皮肤点刺试验进行过敏筛查,相较于体外分子过敏检测,显示出更高的灵敏度。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2023 Feb;13(2):e12220. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12220.
4
Mollusk allergy in shrimp-allergic patients: Still a complex diagnosis. An Italian real-life cross-sectional multicenter study.虾过敏患者中的软体动物过敏:仍然是一个复杂的诊断。一项意大利真实生活横断面多中心研究。
World Allergy Organ J. 2022 Sep 5;15(9):100685. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100685. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
Real-life evaluation of molecular multiplex IgE test methods in the diagnosis of pollen associated food allergy.真实世界评估分子多重 IgE 检测方法在花粉相关食物过敏诊断中的应用。
Allergy. 2022 Oct;77(10):3028-3040. doi: 10.1111/all.15329. Epub 2022 May 9.
6
Diagnosis of Peanut Allergy in Preschool Children: The Impact of Skin Testing With a Novel Composition of Peanuts.学龄前儿童花生过敏的诊断:新型花生成分皮肤试验的影响
Front Pediatr. 2021 Nov 30;9:739224. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.739224. eCollection 2021.