Office on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2020 Mar/Apr;26 Suppl 2, Advancing Legal Epidemiology:S54-S61. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001132.
Policy is an effective tool for reducing the health harms caused by tobacco use. State laws can establish baseline public health protections. Preemptive legislation at the state level, however, can prohibit localities from enacting laws that further protect their citizens from public health threats.
Preemptive state tobacco control laws were assessed using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's State Tobacco Activities Tracking and Evaluation System. Based on the assessments, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention quantified the number of states with certain types of preemptive tobacco control laws in place. In addition, 4 different case examples were presented to highlight the experiences of 4 states with respect to preemption.
Tracking and reporting on preemptive state tobacco control laws through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's State Tobacco Activities Tracking and Evaluation System provide an understanding of the number and scope of preemptive laws. Case examples from Hawaii, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Washington provide a detailed account of how preemption affects tobacco control governance at state and local levels within these 4 states.
政策是减少烟草使用对健康危害的有效工具。州法律可以确立基本的公共卫生保护措施。然而,州一级的先发制人立法可以禁止地方制定进一步保护公民免受公共卫生威胁的法律。
使用疾病预防控制中心的州烟草活动跟踪和评估系统评估先发制人的州烟草控制法。根据评估结果,疾病预防控制中心量化了实施某些类型先发制人烟草控制法的州的数量。此外,还提出了 4 个不同的案例,以突出 4 个州在预先防范方面的经验。
通过疾病预防控制中心的州烟草活动跟踪和评估系统跟踪和报告先发制人的州烟草控制法,可以了解先发制人法律的数量和范围。来自夏威夷、北卡罗来纳州、南卡罗来纳州和华盛顿州的案例提供了一个详细的说明,说明预先防范如何影响这 4 个州的州和地方各级的烟草控制治理。