• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

击败 JUUL 改写旧金山电子烟法规的努力。

Defeating JUUL's Effort to Rewrite San Francisco's E-Cigarette Regulations.

机构信息

Neiloy Sircar is a postdoctoral fellow at the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education at the University of California San Francisco. S. A. Glantz was professor of medicine at the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education and Institute for Health Policy Studies at the University of California San Francisco until he recently retired.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2021 Mar;111(3):457-464. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305993. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2020.305993
PMID:33476232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7893333/
Abstract

In 2019, San Francisco, California, prohibited the sale of electronic cigarettes lacking US Food and Drug Administration authorization. JUUL then promoted a ballot initiative (Proposition C) to replace San Francisco's e-cigarette legislation with legislation JUUL wrote that required future legislation to be approved by the voters. JUUL promoted Proposition C as a way to reduce youth e-cigarette use while allowing adult choice.Health groups argued that JUUL's measure could nullify San Francisco's prohibition on selling flavored tobacco products. Health groups benefitted from having an established campaign network that recently defended the flavor ban. They successfully framed Proposition C as a tobacco industry ploy to undo San Francisco's e-cigarette regulations, particularly the prohibition on selling flavored tobacco products. JUUL ended its campaign on September 30, 2019, and the measure failed on election day, with 82% voting against it.Lessons learned from the campaign include the importance of framing an industry initiative as a threat to local public health lawmaking and the potential for the e-cigarette issue to attract parents as new leaders and engage a powerful constituency to support tobacco control measures.

摘要

2019 年,加利福尼亚州旧金山禁止销售未经美国食品和药物管理局授权的电子烟。JUUL 随后推动了一项投票倡议(提案 C),用 JUUL 撰写的立法取代旧金山的电子烟立法,该立法要求未来的立法必须得到选民的批准。JUUL 推动提案 C 是为了减少青少年电子烟的使用,同时允许成年人选择。健康组织认为,JUUL 的措施可能使旧金山禁止销售调味烟草产品的禁令失效。健康组织受益于一个成熟的竞选网络,该网络最近为禁止调味产品的禁令辩护。他们成功地将提案 C 框定为烟草业废除旧金山电子烟法规的策略,特别是禁止销售调味烟草产品。JUUL 于 2019 年 9 月 30 日结束竞选活动,该措施在选举日失败,82%的人投票反对。该活动的经验教训包括将行业倡议构造成对地方公共卫生立法的威胁的重要性,以及电子烟问题吸引家长成为新的领导者并吸引强大的选民基础来支持烟草控制措施的潜力。

相似文献

1
Defeating JUUL's Effort to Rewrite San Francisco's E-Cigarette Regulations.击败 JUUL 改写旧金山电子烟法规的努力。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Mar;111(3):457-464. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305993. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
2
Support for E-cigarette and Tobacco Control Policies Among Parents of Adolescents.家长对青少年电子烟和烟草控制政策的支持度。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Jun 12;22(7):1139-1147. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz222.
3
Use of JUUL E-cigarettes Among Youth in the United States.美国青少年使用 JUUL 电子烟的情况。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Apr 21;22(5):827-832. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty237.
4
JUUL's 2019 Removal of Mint-Flavored Pods and Changes to the Retail Environment of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems in Florida and the United States.JUUL 在佛罗里达州和美国 2019 年移除薄荷味烟弹并改变电子尼古丁传送系统的零售环境。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Oct 26;24(11):1748-1755. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac128.
5
Compliance with San Francisco's flavoured tobacco sales prohibition.遵守旧金山的调味烟草销售禁令。
Tob Control. 2021 Mar;30(2):227-230. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055549. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
6
Factors associated with past 30-day abstinence from cigarette smoking in a non-probabilistic sample of 15,456 adult established current smokers in the United States who used JUUL vapor products for three months.在美国,一项针对使用 JUUL 蒸气产品三个月的 15456 名成年现有吸烟者进行的非概率抽样研究发现,与过去 30 天戒烟有关的因素。
Harm Reduct J. 2019 Mar 25;16(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12954-019-0293-7.
7
Flavored E-Cigarette Sales in the United States Under Self-Regulation From January 2015 Through October 2019.美国自 2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 10 月期间的调味电子烟销售情况。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Jun;110(6):785-787. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305667. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
8
The importance of product definitions in US e-cigarette laws and regulations.产品定义在美国电子烟法律法规中的重要性。
Tob Control. 2016 Apr;25(e1):e44-51. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051913. Epub 2014 Dec 14.
9
A Public Health Crisis: Electronic Cigarettes, Vape, and JUUL.公共健康危机:电子烟、蒸气烟和 JUUL。
Pediatrics. 2019 Jun;143(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2741.
10
A Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Youth Smoking and a Ban on Sales of Flavored Tobacco Products in San Francisco, California.加利福尼亚州旧金山的青少年吸烟与禁止销售调味烟草产品的差异分析。
JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Aug 1;175(8):863-865. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.0922.

引用本文的文献

1
Global landscape of nicotine and tobacco products additives policies.尼古丁与烟草制品添加剂政策的全球格局
Tob Control. 2024 Oct 14. doi: 10.1136/tc-2024-058622.

本文引用的文献

1
State Legislative Strategies to Pass, Enhance, and Obscure Preemption of Local Public Health Policy-Making.州立法策略通过、加强和模糊化对地方公共卫生政策制定的预先阻止。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Sep;59(3):333-342. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.03.023. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
2
Anticipating and Defeating Preemption Across Public Health.预见并战胜公共卫生领域的先发制人策略
Am J Public Health. 2020 Mar;110(3):268-270. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305528.
3
State Preemption: Impacts on Advances in Tobacco Control.州级先发制人策略:对烟草控制进展的影响。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2020 Mar/Apr;26 Suppl 2, Advancing Legal Epidemiology:S54-S61. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001132.
4
Preemption in Tobacco Control: A Framework for Other Areas of Public Health.烟草控制中的先发制人:公共卫生其他领域的框架。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Mar;110(3):345-350. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305473. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
5
Local Policymakers' New Role: Preventing Preemption.地方政策制定者的新角色:防止抢先行动。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Aug;109(8):1069-1070. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305223.
6
San Francisco Voters End the Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products Despite Strong Industry Opposition.尽管遭到烟草行业的强烈反对,旧金山选民仍终结了调味烟草产品的销售。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Nov 20;169(10):708-709. doi: 10.7326/M18-2317. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
7
Flavored Tobacco Product Use in Youth and Adults: Findings From the First Wave of the PATH Study (2013-2014).青少年和成年人使用调味烟草产品:PATH研究第一波(2013 - 2014年)的结果
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Aug;53(2):139-151. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.026. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
8
E-cigarette Policymaking by Local and State Governments: 2009-2014.地方和州政府的电子烟政策制定:2009 - 2014年
Milbank Q. 2016 Sep;94(3):520-96. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12212.
9
Correlates of current menthol cigarette and flavored other tobacco product use among U.S. young adults.美国年轻成年人中当前薄荷醇香烟及调味烟草制品使用情况的相关因素
Addict Behav. 2016 Nov;62:35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.05.021. Epub 2016 May 31.
10
Electronic cigarette sales to minors via the internet.通过互联网向未成年人销售电子烟。
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Mar;169(3):e1563. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.63. Epub 2015 Mar 2.