Department of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jan 31;21(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-1093-6.
Among other factors, the patients' consultation reasons and GPs' spectrum of services determine the process and outcome of the medical treatment. So far, however, there has been little information on differences in reasons for consultation and GPs' services between urban and rural areas. Our study's goal was thus to investigate these factors in relation to the regional location of GPs' practices.
We conducted a cross-sectional observational study based on standardised GP interviews in a quota sampling design. All counties and independent cities within a radius of 120 km around Hamburg were divided into three regional categories (urban area, environs, rural area) and stratified proportionally to the population size. Differences in the number of reasons for consultation and services were analysed by multivariate linear regressions in mixed models adjusted for random effects on the levels of the German federal states and administrative districts. Differences in individual consultation reasons and services were identified by logistic regression via stepwise forward and backward selection.
Primary care practices in 34 of the 37 selected administrative districts (91.9%) were represented in the dataset. In total, 211 GPs were personally interviewed. On average, GPs saw 344 patients per month with a slightly higher number of patients in rural areas. They reported 59.1 ± 15.4 different reasons for consultation and 30.3 ± 3.9 different services. There was no statistically significant regional variation in the number of different consultation reasons, but there was a broader service spectrum by rural GPs (ß = - 1.42; 95% confidence interval - 2.75/- 0.08; p = 0.038) which was statistically explained by a higher level of medical training. Additionally, there were differences in the frequency of individual consultation reasons and services between rural and urban areas.
GPs in rural areas performed more frequently services usually provided by medical specialists in urban areas. This might be caused by a low availability of specialists in rural areas. The association between medical training and service spectrum might imply that GPs compensate the specific needs of their patients by completing advanced medical training before or after setting up a medical practice.
The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02558322).
除其他因素外,患者的就诊原因和全科医生的服务范围决定了治疗的过程和结果。然而,迄今为止,关于城乡地区就诊原因和全科医生服务的差异的信息很少。我们的研究目的是调查这些因素与全科医生执业区域位置的关系。
我们基于标准的全科医生访谈,以配额抽样设计进行了一项横断面观察性研究。在汉堡半径 120 公里范围内的所有县和独立城市被分为三个区域类别(城区、郊区、农村地区),并按人口规模按比例分层。通过混合模型中的多元线性回归分析,对不同地区的就诊原因和服务数量进行分析,并调整了德国联邦州和行政区水平的随机效应。通过逐步向前和向后选择的逻辑回归确定个体就诊原因和服务的差异。
在所选择的 37 个行政区中的 34 个行政区(91.9%)都有初级保健诊所参与了数据集。共有 211 名全科医生接受了个人访谈。平均而言,全科医生每月接诊 344 名患者,农村地区的患者略多。他们报告了 59.1±15.4 种不同的就诊原因和 30.3±3.9 种不同的服务。不同就诊原因的数量在不同地区没有统计学上的显著差异,但农村地区的全科医生提供的服务范围更广(β=−1.42;95%置信区间−2.75/−0.08;p=0.038),这可以通过更高水平的医疗培训来解释。此外,农村地区和城区之间在个别就诊原因和服务的频率上存在差异。
农村地区的全科医生提供的服务频率高于城区的医疗专家通常提供的服务频率。这可能是由于农村地区缺乏专家所致。医疗培训与服务范围之间的关联可能意味着,全科医生在开设医疗实践之前或之后通过完成高级医疗培训来满足患者的特定需求。
该研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(NCT02558322)。