Suppr超能文献

疫情期间的卫生规划:利比里亚埃博拉疫情期间人道主义应对的定性案例研究。

Hygiene programming during outbreaks: a qualitative case study of the humanitarian response during the Ebola outbreak in Liberia.

机构信息

Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8240-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hygiene promotion is a cornerstone of humanitarian response during infectious disease outbreaks. Despite this, we know little about how humanitarian organisations design, deliver or monitor hygiene programmes, or about what works to change hygiene behaviours in outbreak settings. This study describes humanitarian perspectives on changing behaviours in crises, through a case study of hygiene promotion during the 2014-2016 Liberian Ebola outbreak. Our aim was to aid better understanding of decision making in high-stress situations where there is little precedent or evidence, and to prompt reflection within the sector around how to improve and support this.

METHODS

We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with fourteen purposively-sampled individuals (key informants) from international organisations involved in hygiene behaviour change during the outbreak. Through thematic analysis we identified the decisions that were made and processes that were followed to design, deliver and monitor interventions. We compared our findings with theory-driven processes used to design behaviour change interventions in non-outbreak situations.

RESULTS

Humanitarians predominantly focussed on providing hygiene products (e.g. buckets, soap, gloves) and delivering messages through posters, radio and community meetings. They faced challenges in defining which hygiene behaviours to promote. Assessments focused on understanding infrastructural needs, but omitted systematic assessments of hygiene behaviours or their determinants. Humanitarians assumed that fear and disease awareness would be the most powerful motivators for behaviour change. They thought that behaviour change techniques used in non-emergency settings were too 'experimental', and were beyond the skillset of most humanitarian actors. Monitoring focussed on inputs and outputs rather than behavioural impact.

CONCLUSIONS

The experiences of humanitarians allowed us to identify areas that could be strengthened when designing hygiene programmes in future outbreaks. Specifically, we identified a need for rapid research methods to explore behavioural determinants; increased skills training for frontline staff, and increased operational research to explore behaviour change strategies that are suited to outbreak situations.

摘要

背景

促进卫生是传染病爆发期间人道主义应对的基石。尽管如此,我们对人道主义组织如何设计、提供或监测卫生方案,以及在爆发环境中哪些措施可以有效改变卫生行为知之甚少。本研究通过利比里亚 2014-2016 年埃博拉疫情期间卫生促进情况的案例研究,描述了人道主义者对危机中行为改变的看法。我们的目的是帮助更好地理解在几乎没有先例或证据的高压情况下的决策过程,并促使该行业反思如何改进和支持这一过程。

方法

我们对 14 名来自参与疫情期间卫生行为改变的国际组织的有针对性抽样的个人(关键信息提供者)进行了深入的半结构化访谈。通过主题分析,我们确定了为设计、提供和监测干预措施而做出的决策和遵循的流程。我们将我们的发现与用于在非疫情情况下设计行为改变干预措施的理论驱动过程进行了比较。

结果

人道主义者主要专注于提供卫生产品(如桶、肥皂、手套)并通过海报、广播和社区会议传递信息。他们在确定要推广哪些卫生行为方面面临挑战。评估侧重于了解基础设施需求,但忽略了对卫生行为或其决定因素的系统评估。人道主义者认为恐惧和对疾病的认识将是行为改变的最有力动机。他们认为在非紧急情况下使用的行为改变技术过于“实验性”,超出了大多数人道主义行为者的技能范围。监测主要集中在投入和产出上,而不是行为影响上。

结论

人道主义者的经验使我们能够确定在未来爆发疫情时设计卫生方案时可以加强的领域。具体而言,我们需要快速研究方法来探索行为决定因素;增加对前线工作人员的技能培训,并增加运营研究以探索适合爆发情况的行为改变策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ae/6995147/7ee9776e7f21/12889_2020_8240_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验