Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 Nov 13;75(12):2404-2411. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa035.
The Figure-of-8-Walk test (F8WT) is a performance measure of the motor skill of walking. Unlike walking speed over a straight path, it captures curved path walking, which is essential to real-world activity, but meaningful cut-points have yet to be developed for the F8WT.
A secondary analysis of 421 community-dwelling older adults (mean age 80.7 ± 7.8), who participated in a community-based exercise clinical trial, was performed. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCC) were calculated using baseline data, with F8WT performance discriminating different self-reported global mobility and balance dichotomies. Cut-points for the F8WT were chosen to optimize sensitivity and specificity. For validation, F8WT cut-points were applied to postintervention F8WT data. Participants were called monthly for 12 months after intervention completion to record self-reported incident falls, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations; risks of the outcomes were compared between those who performed well and poorly on the F8WT.
F8WT performance times of ≤9.09 seconds and ≤9.27 seconds can discriminate those with excellent (sensitivity = 0.647; specificity = 0.654) and excellent/very good global mobility (sensitivity = 0.649; specificity = 0.648), respectively. A total number of steps ≤17 on the F8WT can discriminate those with excellent/very good/good global balance (sensitivity = 0.646; specificity = 0.608). Compared to those who performed poorly, those who performed well had a lower incidence of negative outcomes: F8WT time ≤9.09 seconds = 46%-59% lower; F8WT time ≤9.27 seconds = 46%-56% lower; F8WT steps ≤17 = 44%-50% lower.
Clinicians may consider these preliminary cut-points to aid in their clinical decision making, but further study is needed for definitive recommendations.
八字走(F8WT)测试是对步行运动技能的一项表现测量。与直线路径的步行速度不同,它捕捉到了现实世界活动中至关重要的曲线路径行走,但对于 F8WT 来说,仍需要制定有意义的分界点。
对参加基于社区的锻炼临床试验的 421 名社区居住的老年人(平均年龄 80.7±7.8 岁)进行了二次分析。使用基线数据计算了受试者工作特征曲线(AUROCC)下面积,F8WT 表现可区分不同的自我报告整体移动性和平衡二分法。选择 F8WT 的分界点以优化敏感性和特异性。为了验证,将 F8WT 的分界点应用于干预后的 F8WT 数据。干预完成后,每月与参与者联系 12 个月,以记录自我报告的新发跌倒、急诊就诊和住院情况;比较 F8WT 表现好和差的参与者的结果风险。
F8WT 表现时间≤9.09 秒和≤9.27 秒可分别区分表现优秀(敏感性=0.647;特异性=0.654)和表现优秀/非常好整体移动性(敏感性=0.649;特异性=0.648)的个体。F8WT 上的总步数≤17 可区分表现优秀/非常好/好整体平衡的个体(敏感性=0.646;特异性=0.608)。与表现不佳的个体相比,表现良好的个体负面结果的发生率较低:F8WT 时间≤9.09 秒=46%-59%更低;F8WT 时间≤9.27 秒=46%-56%更低;F8WT 步数≤17=44%-50%更低。
临床医生可以考虑这些初步的分界点来辅助他们的临床决策,但需要进一步的研究来提供明确的建议。