• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估美国头颈部癌症患者死亡地点的差异,利用疾病预防控制中心 Wonder 数据库。

Evaluating for disparities in place of death for head and neck cancer patients in the United States utilizing the CDC WONDER database.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3085, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

Oral Oncol. 2020 Mar;102:104555. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104555. Epub 2020 Jan 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104555
PMID:32006782
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate trends in place of death for patients with head and neck cancers (HNC) in the U.S. from 1999 to 2017 based on the CDC WONDER (Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research) database.

MATERIALS/METHODS: Using patient-level data from 2015 and aggregate data from 1999 to 2017, multivariable logistic regression analyses (MLR) were performed to evaluate for disparities in place of death.

RESULTS

We obtained aggregate data for 101,963 people who died of HNC between 1999 and 2017 (25.9% oral cavity, 24.6% oropharynx/pharynx, 0.4% nasopharynx, and 49.1% larynx/hypopharynx). Most were Caucasian (92.7%) and male (87.0%). Deaths at home or hospice increased over the study period (R = 0.96, p < 0.05) from 29.2% in 1999 to 61.2% in 2017. On MLR of patient-level data from 2015, those who were single (ref), ages 85+ (OR 0.78; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.90), African American (OR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.65, 0.82), or Asian/Pacific Islanders (OR 0.66; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.81) were less likely to die at home or hospice. On MLR of the aggregate data (1999-2017), those who were female (OR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.83, 0.91) or ages 75-84 (OR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.76, 0.82) were also less likely to die at home or hospice. In both analyses, those who died from larynx/hypopharynx cancers were less likely to die at home or hospice.

CONCLUSIONS

HNC-related deaths at home or hospice increased between 1999 and 2017. Those who were single, female, African American, Asian/Pacific Islander, older (ages 75+), or those with larynx/hypopharynx cancers were less likely to die at home or hospice.

摘要

目的

基于疾病预防控制中心 Wonder(广泛在线数据用于流行病学研究)数据库,评估 1999 年至 2017 年美国头颈部癌症(HNC)患者死亡地点的趋势。

材料/方法:使用 2015 年的患者水平数据和 1999 年至 2017 年的汇总数据,进行多变量逻辑回归分析(MLR),以评估死亡地点的差异。

结果

我们获得了 1999 年至 2017 年间 101963 例 HNC 死亡患者的汇总数据(25.9%口腔癌,24.6%口咽癌/咽癌,0.4%鼻咽癌,49.1%喉癌/下咽癌)。大多数为白种人(92.7%)和男性(87.0%)。在研究期间,在家中或临终关怀机构死亡的比例有所增加(R=0.96,p<0.05),从 1999 年的 29.2%增加到 2017 年的 61.2%。在对 2015 年患者水平数据的 MLR 分析中,单身者(参考)、85 岁以上者(OR 0.78;95%CI:0.68,0.90)、非裔美国人(OR 0.73;95%CI:0.65,0.82)或亚裔/太平洋岛民(OR 0.66;95%CI:0.54,0.81)不太可能在家中或临终关怀机构死亡。在汇总数据的 MLR 分析中(1999-2017 年),女性(OR 0.87;95%CI:0.83,0.91)或 75-84 岁(OR 0.79;95%CI:0.76,0.82)的患者也不太可能在家中或临终关怀机构死亡。在这两种分析中,死于喉癌/下咽癌的患者不太可能在家中或临终关怀机构死亡。

结论

1999 年至 2017 年间,在家中或临终关怀机构的 HNC 相关死亡人数有所增加。单身、女性、非裔美国人、亚裔/太平洋岛民、年龄较大(75 岁以上)或患有喉癌/下咽癌的患者不太可能在家中或临终关怀机构死亡。

相似文献

1
Evaluating for disparities in place of death for head and neck cancer patients in the United States utilizing the CDC WONDER database.评估美国头颈部癌症患者死亡地点的差异,利用疾病预防控制中心 Wonder 数据库。
Oral Oncol. 2020 Mar;102:104555. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104555. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
2
Head and Neck Cancer Stage at Presentation and Survival Outcomes Among Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Patients Compared With Asian and White Patients.头颈部癌症患者的就诊时分期和生存结局在夏威夷原住民和其他太平洋岛民患者与亚裔和白人患者中的比较。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Jul 1;148(7):636-645. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.1086.
3
Disparities in place of death for patients with primary brain tumors and brain metastases in the USA.美国原发性脑肿瘤和脑转移瘤患者死亡地点的差异。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Aug;30(8):6795-6805. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07120-4. Epub 2022 May 9.
4
Socioeconomic and demographic disparities of moyamoya disease in the United States.美国烟雾病的社会经济和人口统计学差异。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 May;192:105719. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105719. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
5
Hospice usage by minorities in the last year of life: results from the National Mortality Followback Survey.少数族裔在生命最后一年对临终关怀服务的使用情况:来自全国死亡率随访调查的结果
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Jul;51(7):970-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.51310.x.
6
Changing patterns in place of cancer death in England: a population-based study.英格兰地区癌症死因变化模式:一项基于人群的研究。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(3):e1001410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001410. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
7
A 22-Year Study to Assess Disparities in Place of Death Among Patients With Diabetes.一项评估糖尿病患者死亡地点差异的22年研究。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 4;15(12):e49929. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49929. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Down Syndrome: Evaluating Disparities in Place of Death in the United States Using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC-WONDER) Database Over 22 Years.唐氏综合征:利用疾病控制与预防中心的广泛流行病学研究在线数据(CDC-WONDER)数据库评估美国22年间死亡地点的差异
Cureus. 2024 Jun 26;16(6):e63212. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63212. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Evaluating Disparities in Places of Death in the United States Among Patients With Intellectual Disabilities: A 22-Year Analysis Using the CDC-WONDER Database.评估美国智力残疾患者死亡地点的差异:使用疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)-WONDER数据库进行的22年分析。
Cureus. 2023 Oct 2;15(10):e46347. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46347. eCollection 2023 Oct.
10
Trends and Factors Associated with Place of Death for Individuals with Dementia in the United States.美国痴呆症患者死亡地点的趋势和相关因素。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Feb;68(2):250-255. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16200. Epub 2019 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
A CDC WONDER Study on Disparities in Place of Death Among Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the United States between 1999 and 2020.一项关于1999年至2020年美国系统性红斑狼疮患者死亡地点差异的疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)WONDER研究。
Cureus. 2025 Aug 4;17(8):e89313. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89313. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Disparities in End-of-Life Outcomes: A Demographic and Geographic Analysis of Endometrial Cancer Deaths in the United States.临终结局的差异:美国子宫内膜癌死亡的人口统计学和地理学分析
Cureus. 2025 Apr 10;17(4):e81986. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81986. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Disparities in Dysphagia Care Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
头颈癌患者吞咽困难护理的差异:一项回顾性队列研究
OTO Open. 2025 Apr 11;9(2):e70090. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70090. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
4
Non-curative care options for patients with advanced-stage head and neck cancer: Current state of the science and future opportunities.晚期头颈癌患者的非治愈性护理选择:科学现状与未来机遇
Palliat Support Care. 2025 Feb 17;23:e59. doi: 10.1017/S1478951524002049.
5
Temporal Trends in Parkinson's Disease Related Mortality from 1999-2020: A National Analysis.1999 - 2020年帕金森病相关死亡率的时间趋势:一项全国性分析。
NIHR Open Res. 2024 Sep 13;4:50. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13623.1. eCollection 2024.
6
Socioeconomic Trends in Palliative Care: A Six-Year Study.姑息治疗中的社会经济趋势:一项为期六年的研究。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 11;16(10):e71274. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71274. eCollection 2024 Oct.
7
Head and neck cancer mortality in the United States: Regional differences in hospice use and place of death.美国头颈癌死亡率:临终关怀使用情况及死亡地点的地区差异。
BJC Rep. 2024 Oct 8;2(1):79. doi: 10.1038/s44276-024-00101-6.
8
Disparities in Multiple Myeloma Mortality Rate Trends by Demographic Status in the USA.美国不同人口统计学状况下多发性骨髓瘤死亡率趋势的差异
Cancer Diagn Progn. 2024 May 3;4(3):288-294. doi: 10.21873/cdp.10322. eCollection 2024 May-Jun.
9
Disparities in the Place of Death for Patients With Malignant Neoplasms of the Thyroid Gland.甲状腺恶性肿瘤患者死亡地点的差异
Cureus. 2024 Mar 4;16(3):e55506. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55506. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
Anorexia Nervosa: Evaluating Disparities in Places of Death in the United States Over 22 Years Using the CDC WONDER Database.神经性厌食症:利用疾病控制与预防中心的WONDER数据库评估美国22年间死亡地点的差异。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 28;15(12):e51245. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51245. eCollection 2023 Dec.