Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, School of Medicine, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS Med. 2013;10(3):e1001410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001410. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
Most patients with cancer prefer to die at home or in a hospice, but hospitals remain the most common place of death (PoD).This study aims to explore the changing time trends of PoD and the associated factors, which are essential for end-of-life care improvement.
The study analysed all cancer deaths in England collected by the Office for National Statistics during 1993-2010 (n = 2,281,223). Time trends of age- and gender-standardised proportion of deaths in individual PoDs were evaluated using weighted piecewise linear regression. Variables associated with PoD (home or hospice versus hospital) were determined using proportion ratio (PR) derived from the log-binomial regression, adjusting for clustering effects. Hospital remained the most common PoD throughout the study period (48.0%; 95% CI 47.9%-48.0%), followed by home (24.5%; 95% CI 24.4%-24.5%), and hospice (16.4%; 95% CI 16.3%-16.4%). Home and hospice deaths increased since 2005 (0.87%; 95% CI 0.74%-0.99%/year, 0.24%; 95% CI 0.17%-0.32%/year, respectively, p<0.001), while hospital deaths declined (-1.20%; 95% CI -1.41 to -0.99/year, p<0.001). Patients who died from haematological cancer (PRs 0.46-0.52), who were single, widowed, or divorced (PRs 0.75-0.88), and aged over 75 (PRs 0.81-0.84 for 75-84; 0.66-0.72 for 85+) were less likely to die in home or hospice (p<0.001; reference groups: colorectal cancer, married, age 25-54). There was little improvement in patients with lung cancer of dying in home or hospice (PRs 0.87-0.88). Marital status became the second most important factor associated with PoD, after cancer type. Patients from less deprived areas (higher quintile of the deprivation index) were more likely to die at home or in a hospice than those from more deprived areas (lower quintile of the deprivation index; PRs 1.02-1.12). The analysis is limited by a lack of data on individual patients' preferences for PoD or a clinical indication of the most appropriate PoD.
More efforts are needed to reduce hospital deaths. Health care facilities should be improved and enhanced to support the increased home and hospice deaths. People who are single, widowed, or divorced should be a focus for end-of-life care improvement, along with known at risk groups such as haematological cancer, lung cancer, older age, and deprivation. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
大多数癌症患者更愿意在家中或临终关怀机构去世,而非在医院,但医院仍是最常见的死亡地点。本研究旨在探索死亡地点的时间变化趋势及其相关因素,这对改善临终关怀至关重要。
本研究分析了英格兰国家统计局在 1993 年至 2010 年期间收集的所有癌症死亡病例(n=2281223)。使用加权分段线性回归评估各单一死亡地点的年龄和性别标准化比例的时间变化趋势。使用来自对数二项式回归的比例比(PR)确定与死亡地点(家庭或临终关怀机构与医院)相关的变量,该回归调整了聚类效应。在整个研究期间,医院仍是最常见的死亡地点(48.0%;95%CI 47.9%-48.0%),其次是家庭(24.5%;95%CI 24.4%-24.5%)和临终关怀机构(16.4%;95%CI 16.3%-16.4%)。自 2005 年以来,家庭和临终关怀机构的死亡人数有所增加(每年分别增加 0.87%(95%CI 0.74%-0.99%)和 0.24%(95%CI 0.17%-0.32%),p<0.001),而医院的死亡人数则有所下降(每年减少 1.20%(95%CI 1.41 至 0.99%),p<0.001)。死于血液癌(PRs 0.46-0.52)、单身、丧偶或离异(PRs 0.75-0.88)以及年龄超过 75 岁(PRs 75-84 为 0.81-0.84;85+为 0.66-0.72)的患者,不太可能在家或临终关怀机构死亡(p<0.001;参考组为结直肠癌、已婚、年龄 25-54)。死于肺癌的患者在家庭或临终关怀机构死亡的情况几乎没有改善(PRs 0.87-0.88)。婚姻状况成为与死亡地点相关的第二大重要因素,仅次于癌症类型。来自不太贫困地区(剥夺指数较高的五分位)的患者比来自更贫困地区(剥夺指数较低的五分位)的患者更有可能在家或临终关怀机构死亡(PRs 1.02-1.12)。该分析受到缺乏个体患者对死亡地点偏好的相关数据或最适当死亡地点的临床指征的限制。
需要进一步努力减少医院死亡人数。应改善和加强医疗设施,以支持在家和临终关怀机构死亡人数的增加。单身、丧偶或离异的人群应成为改善临终关怀的重点关注对象,同时还应关注已知的高危群体,如血液癌、肺癌、高龄和贫困。请在文章后面查看编辑总结。