• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国原发性脑肿瘤和脑转移瘤患者死亡地点的差异。

Disparities in place of death for patients with primary brain tumors and brain metastases in the USA.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, 20 Duke Medicine Cir, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.

Department of Interventional Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2022 Aug;30(8):6795-6805. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07120-4. Epub 2022 May 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-022-07120-4
PMID:35527286
Abstract

PURPOSE

Patients with primary or metastatic brain tumors often require intensive end-of-life care, for which place of death may serve as a quality metric. Death at home or hospice is considered a more "ideal" location. Comprehensive information on place of death of people with brain tumors is lacking.

METHODS

Using CDC Wonder Database data, those who died in the USA from a solid cancer from 2003 to 2016 were included and place of death for those with primary brain, brain metastases, and solid non-brain tumors were compared. Multivariate logistic regression tested for disparities in place of death.

RESULTS

By 2016, 51.1% of patients with primary brain tumors and 45.2% with brain metastases died at home. 15.9% of patients with primary brain tumors and 23.6% with brain metastases died in the hospital. Black patients were least likely to die at home or hospice. For patients with primary brain tumors, being married (OR = 2.25 (95%CI 2.16-2.34), p < 0.01) and having an advanced degree (OR = 1.204 (95%CI 1.15-1.26), p < 0.01) increased odds of home/hospice death; older age (OR = 0.50 (95%CI 0.46-0.54), p < 0.01) decreased odds for home/hospice death. For patients with brain metastases, being married (OR = 2.19 (95%CI 2.11-2.26), p < 0.01) increased odds of home/hospice death and male sex (OR = 0.87 (095%CI .85-0.89), p < 0.01) and older age (OR = 0.59 (95%CI 0.47-0.75), p < 0.01) decreased odds of home/hospice death.

CONCLUSION

Disparities exist in place of death in the brain tumor population. Focused interventions are indicated to increase the utilization of hospice in those with metastatic cancer, under-represented minority groups, and the elderly population.

摘要

目的

原发性或转移性脑肿瘤患者通常需要接受临终关怀,而死亡地点可以作为衡量临终关怀质量的标准。在家中或临终关怀机构死亡被认为是更“理想”的地点。目前缺乏关于脑肿瘤患者死亡地点的综合信息。

方法

利用美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)Wonder 数据库的数据,纳入 2003 年至 2016 年期间在美国死于实体癌的患者,并比较了原发性脑肿瘤、脑转移瘤和非脑实体瘤患者的死亡地点。采用多变量逻辑回归检验死亡地点的差异。

结果

到 2016 年,51.1%的原发性脑肿瘤患者和 45.2%的脑转移瘤患者在家中死亡。15.9%的原发性脑肿瘤患者和 23.6%的脑转移瘤患者在医院死亡。黑人患者在家中或临终关怀机构死亡的可能性最低。对于原发性脑肿瘤患者,已婚(OR=2.25(95%CI 2.16-2.34),p<0.01)和拥有高等学历(OR=1.204(95%CI 1.15-1.26),p<0.01)会增加在家/临终关怀机构死亡的几率;年龄较大(OR=0.50(95%CI 0.46-0.54),p<0.01)会降低在家/临终关怀机构死亡的几率。对于脑转移瘤患者,已婚(OR=2.19(95%CI 2.11-2.26),p<0.01)会增加在家/临终关怀机构死亡的几率,而男性(OR=0.87(95%CI 0.85-0.89),p<0.01)和年龄较大(OR=0.59(95%CI 0.47-0.75),p<0.01)会降低在家/临终关怀机构死亡的几率。

结论

脑肿瘤患者的死亡地点存在差异。需要有针对性地干预,以增加转移性癌症、代表性不足的少数族裔和老年人群体对临终关怀的利用。

相似文献

1
Disparities in place of death for patients with primary brain tumors and brain metastases in the USA.美国原发性脑肿瘤和脑转移瘤患者死亡地点的差异。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Aug;30(8):6795-6805. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07120-4. Epub 2022 May 9.
2
Evaluating for disparities in place of death for head and neck cancer patients in the United States utilizing the CDC WONDER database.评估美国头颈部癌症患者死亡地点的差异,利用疾病预防控制中心 Wonder 数据库。
Oral Oncol. 2020 Mar;102:104555. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104555. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
3
Hospice Utilization in Elderly Patients With Brain Metastases.老年脑转移瘤患者的临终关怀利用。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Dec 14;112(12):1251-1258. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa036.
4
Evaluation of Racial Disparities in Hospice Use and End-of-Life Treatment Intensity in the REGARDS Cohort.评估 REGARDS 队列中临终关怀使用和临终治疗强度的种族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2014639. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14639.
5
Place of death for patients with cancer in the United States, 1999 through 2015: Racial, age, and geographic disparities.美国癌症患者的死亡地点,1999 年至 2015 年:种族、年龄和地域差异。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 15;124(22):4408-4419. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31737. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
6
Changes in the place of death for older adults with cancer: Reason to celebrate or a risk for unintended disparities?老年癌症患者死亡地点的变化:是值得庆祝的理由还是意外差距的风险?
J Geriatr Oncol. 2021 Apr;12(3):361-367. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
7
Trends and Factors Associated with Place of Death for Individuals with Dementia in the United States.美国痴呆症患者死亡地点的趋势和相关因素。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Feb;68(2):250-255. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16200. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
8
Trends in Place of Death for Cardiovascular Mortality Related to Heart Failure in the United States From 2003 to 2017.2003 年至 2017 年美国与心力衰竭相关心血管死亡率的死亡地点趋势。
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Feb;13(2):e006587. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006587. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
9
Trends in Place of Death for Individuals With Deaths Attributed to Advanced Chronic or End-Stage Kidney Disease in the United States.美国归因于晚期慢性或终末期肾病的个体的死亡地点趋势。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Jan;61(1):112-120.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
10
Social and clinical determinants of preferences and their achievement at the end of life: prospective cohort study of older adults receiving palliative care in three countries.社会和临床决定因素对生命终末期偏好及其实现的影响:对三个国家接受姑息治疗的老年患者的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0648-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Mortality from malignant neoplasms at home and in hospitals in Brazil, 2002-2022: sociodemographic characteristics and temporal trends.2002 - 2022年巴西国内及医院恶性肿瘤死亡率:社会人口学特征及时间趋势
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2025 May 2;28:e250021. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720250021. eCollection 2025.
2
Role of Hospital Connectedness in Brain Metastasis Outcomes.医院关联性在脑转移瘤治疗结局中的作用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2435051. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35051.
3
Place of Death for Israeli Cancer Patients Over a 20-Year Period: Reducing Hospital Deaths, but Barriers Remain.

本文引用的文献

1
The Importance of Shared Decision-Making for Patients with Glioblastoma.共同决策对胶质母细胞瘤患者的重要性。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Sep 10;15:2009-2016. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S314792. eCollection 2021.
2
Cancer Statistics, 2021.癌症统计数据,2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
3
Disparities in place of death for patients with hematological malignancies, 1999 to 2015.1999 年至 2015 年血液系统恶性肿瘤患者死亡地点的差异。
以色列癌症患者 20 年来的死亡地点:医院死亡人数减少,但仍存在障碍。
Oncologist. 2023 Nov 2;28(11):e1092-e1098. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad141.
Blood Adv. 2019 Feb 12;3(3):333-338. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018023051.
4
Place of death for patients with cancer in the United States, 1999 through 2015: Racial, age, and geographic disparities.美国癌症患者的死亡地点,1999 年至 2015 年:种族、年龄和地域差异。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 15;124(22):4408-4419. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31737. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
5
Inpatient utilization and disparities: The last year of life of adolescent and young adult oncology patients in California.住院利用情况和差异:加利福尼亚州青少年和青年癌症患者生命的最后一年。
Cancer. 2018 Apr 15;124(8):1819-1827. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31233. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
6
Hospice utilization in patients with malignant gliomas.恶性脑胶质瘤患者的临终关怀利用。
Neuro Oncol. 2018 Mar 27;20(4):538-545. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox196.
7
Disparities in location of death of adolescents and young adults with cancer: A longitudinal, population study in California.癌症青少年及青年患者死亡地点的差异:加利福尼亚州的一项纵向人群研究。
Cancer. 2017 Nov 1;123(21):4178-4184. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30860. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
8
Hospital-Based End-of-Life Care and Costs for Older Patients With Malignant Brain Tumors.基于医院的恶性脑肿瘤老年患者临终关怀和费用。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;3(11):1581-1582. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1624.
9
End-of-Life Racial and Ethnic Disparities Among Patients With Ovarian Cancer.卵巢癌患者临终时的种族和民族差异
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;35(16):1829-1835. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.2894. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
10
Trends in place of death: The role of demographic and epidemiological shifts in end-of-life care policy.死亡地点趋势:人口和流行病学变化在临终关怀政策中的作用。
Palliat Med. 2017 Dec;31(10):964-974. doi: 10.1177/0269216317691259. Epub 2017 Feb 13.