• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床研究基地选择的统计学方法。

Statistical Methods for Clinical Study Site Selection.

机构信息

Division of Biostatistics, Office of Surveillance and Biometrics, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903, New Hampshire Avenue, Building 66, Room 2268, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Jan;54(1):211-219. doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00047-9. Epub 2020 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1007/s43441-019-00047-9
PMID:32008238
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The US Food and Drug Administration conducts on-site inspections and data audits through Bioresearch Monitoring program for assurance of the quality and integrity of data in the pre- and postapproval processes. It is important to inspect the study sites that are different compared with other sites in clinical studies and identify the problems related to those sites. Usually one cannot inspect all the sites in a clinical study because of limited resources, and statistical tools are needed to help in selecting sites for inspection.

METHODS

We propose two technical approaches, namely Fisher combination approach and likelihood ratio test (LRT) approach, for site selection, with each approach integrating the information obtained from a P value matrix. The proposed approaches produce site rankings, and the sites with highest rankings may be selected for inspection.

RESULTS

The application of the approaches is demonstrated through a hypothetical data set reflecting the pattern of the real data in a premarket approval submission for a diagnostic device. The proposed methods are shown, through extensive simulations, to control false discovery rate, while maintaining good sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

The proposed approaches will be useful for site selection process. However, limitations exist when only using the statistical approaches proposed here. In practice, investigators will select the site for inspection by considering the outputs from the statistical approaches along with other important factors. Future research topic is discussed to facilitate practical application of the approaches.

摘要

背景

美国食品和药物管理局通过生物研究监测计划进行现场检查和数据审计,以确保在批准前和批准后过程中数据的质量和完整性。检查临床试验中与其他站点不同的研究站点并识别与这些站点相关的问题非常重要。由于资源有限,通常无法检查临床研究中的所有站点,因此需要统计工具来帮助选择要检查的站点。

方法

我们提出了两种技术方法,即 Fisher 组合方法和似然比检验(LRT)方法,用于站点选择,每种方法都整合了从 P 值矩阵中获得的信息。所提出的方法会生成站点排名,排名最高的站点可能会被选中进行检查。

结果

通过反映医疗器械上市前批准提交中真实数据模式的假设数据集来演示方法的应用。通过广泛的模拟,所提出的方法被证明可以控制假发现率,同时保持良好的灵敏度。

结论

所提出的方法将有助于选择站点。但是,仅使用此处提出的统计方法存在局限性。在实践中,调查人员将通过考虑统计方法的输出以及其他重要因素来选择要检查的站点。讨论了未来的研究课题,以促进这些方法的实际应用。

相似文献

1
Statistical Methods for Clinical Study Site Selection.临床研究基地选择的统计学方法。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Jan;54(1):211-219. doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00047-9. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
2
Comparing methods for clinical investigator site inspection selection: a comparison of site selection methods of investigators in clinical trials.比较临床研究者现场检查选择方法:临床试验中研究者现场选择方法的比较
J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(5):860-873. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1657134. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
3
Central site monitoring: results from a test of accuracy in identifying trials and sites failing Food and Drug Administration inspection.中心监测站点:在识别食品和药物管理局检查失败的试验和站点方面的准确性测试结果。
Clin Trials. 2014 Apr;11(2):205-17. doi: 10.1177/1740774513508028. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
4
Data Integrity in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Analysis of Inspections and Warning Letters Issued by the Bioresearch Monitoring Program Between Fiscal Years 2007-2018.制药行业的数据完整性:对 2007-2018 财年生物研究监测计划发布的检查和警告信的分析。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Sep;54(5):1123-1133. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00129-z. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
5
US Food and Drug Administration Clinical Investigator Inspections.美国食品和药物管理局临床调查员检查。
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2020 Apr;36(2):151000. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2020.151000. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
6
Research Deviations in FDA-Regulated Clinical Trials: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of FDA Inspection Citations.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)监管的临床试验中的研究偏差:对FDA检查引用情况的横断面分析
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Sep;52(5):579-591. doi: 10.1177/2168479017751405. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
7
Likelihood ratio test-based method for signal detection in drug classes using FDA's AERS database.基于似然比检验的方法,利用美国食品药品监督管理局的不良事件报告系统数据库对药物类别中的信号进行检测。
J Biopharm Stat. 2013;23(1):178-200. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2013.736810.
8
Perspectives on the U.S. FDA Bioresearch Monitoring Program.对美国食品药品监督管理局生物研究监管计划的见解
Qual Assur. 1995 Mar;4(1):12-9.
9
FDA's conduct, review, and evaluation of inspections of clinical investigators.美国食品药品监督管理局对临床研究人员检查的实施、审查和评估。
Drug Inf J. 1987;21(2):117-25. doi: 10.1177/009286158702100202.
10
Practical Issues in Clinical Inspection Process.临床检查过程中的实际问题。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 May;53(3):374-380. doi: 10.1177/2168479018769887. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
A Clustering Ensemble Method for Drug Safety Signal Detection in Post-Marketing Surveillance.一种用于上市后监测中药物安全信号检测的聚类集成方法。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Jan;59(1):89-101. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00705-7. Epub 2024 Oct 20.