Human Development and Family Studies, Auburn University , Auburn, Alabama.
Behav Sleep Med. 2021 Mar-Apr;19(2):159-177. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2020.1721501. Epub 2020 Feb 2.
Lower socioeconomic status (SES) is generally associated with poor sleep but little is known about how different SES indices are associated with sleep duration and quality, or about these relations longitudinally or in cohabiting couples. The main objective was to examine longitudinal associations between multiple SES and sleep parameters in cohabiting adults. Participants were cohabiting couples ( = 135) of women ( age = 37.2 years, = 5.93; 76% White/European American, 18% Black/African American) and men (M = 39.9 years, = 7.33; 78% White, 18% Black). Men and women participated twice with a 1-year lag. At Time (T1), participants reported on multiple SES indices including their income, perceived economic well-being, education, employment status, and occupation. Sleep at T1 and T2 was assessed with self-reports and actigraphs (sleep duration from onset to wake time, %sleep from onset to wake, long wake episodes). Actor effects on actigraphy-assessed sleep parameters were evident for both men and women; low SES was associated with shorter duration and poor quality (%sleep, long wake episodes) sleep. These associations were most pronounced for income-to-needs ratio (men and women) and perceived economic well-being (women only). Partner effects were also evident such that men's employment status was associated with women's longer sleep duration and greater sleep quality (%sleep) whereas women's employment predicted increased subjective sleep problems for men. Findings illustrate the need to consider multiple SES and sleep indices, as well as the family context in studies addressing linkages between SES and sleep.
较低的社会经济地位(SES)通常与较差的睡眠质量有关,但对于不同的 SES 指数与睡眠持续时间和质量的关系,以及这些关系的纵向或同居伴侣关系中的情况,人们知之甚少。主要目的是研究同居成年人中多个 SES 与睡眠参数之间的纵向关联。参与者为同居夫妻(共 135 对),包括女性(年龄为 37.2 岁,SD=5.93;76%为白种人/欧洲裔美国人,18%为黑种人/非裔美国人)和男性(M=39.9 岁,SD=7.33;78%为白种人,18%为黑种人)。男性和女性均在 1 年的时间间隔内进行了两次参与。在时间 1(T1),参与者报告了多个 SES 指数,包括收入、经济幸福感、教育程度、就业状况和职业。T1 和 T2 时的睡眠通过自我报告和活动记录仪进行评估(从入睡到醒来的睡眠时间、从入睡到醒来的睡眠百分比、长唤醒期)。T1 和 T2 时,活动记录仪评估的睡眠参数存在演员效应;低 SES 与较短的睡眠时间和较差的睡眠质量(睡眠百分比、长唤醒期)相关。对于收入需求比(男性和女性)和经济幸福感(仅女性),这些关联最为明显。伴侣效应也很明显,例如男性的就业状况与女性较长的睡眠时间和更高的睡眠质量(睡眠百分比)相关,而女性的就业状况则预示着男性的主观睡眠问题增加。这些发现说明了在研究 SES 和睡眠之间的联系时,需要考虑多个 SES 和睡眠指数以及家庭背景。