Musacchio Angela, Corrao Carmela Romana Natalina, Altissimi Giancarlo, Scarpa Alfonso, Girolamo Stefano Di, Stadio Arianna Di, Greco Antonio, Ralli Massimo
Department of Sense Organs, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy Department of Sense Organs Sapienza University of Rome Italy.
Department of Public Health and Infectious Disease, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy Department of Public Health and Infectious Disease Sapienza University of Rome Italy.
Int Tinnitus J. 2019 Sep 4;23(2):108-115. doi: 10.5935/0946-5448.20190019.
Noise is a well-known risk factor in occupational medicine. Several studies have been performed in workplaces with noise sources, especially in the industrial field; on the contrary, only a few studies have been carried to evaluate the noise exposure effects in non-industrial workplaces such as small factories, handicraft laboratories, and dental laboratories. The aims of this study were to evaluate workplace noise exposure and hearing thresholds in dental technicians. Four laboratories and 51 dental technicians were included in the study. Noise exposure levels during a nominal eight-hour working day (LEX, 8 h) were assessed in the included laboratories. Audiometric thresholds with pure tone audiometry were performed in 51 dental technicians, and results were compared with those expected in subjects not exposed to noise. The environmental noise measures showed moderate differences of the LEX, 8 h among the four laboratories (range 71.4 to 76.2); average LEX, 8 h was 73.9 ± 2.2 dB(A). The audiometric results showed a progressive increase of hearing threshold values at the frequencies mostly involved in noise-induced hearing loss (3, 4 and 6 kHz) and a correlation with age and working seniority especially in males (p<0.005). Nevertheless, in the 92.1% of subjects the threshold increases were in line with those expected in subjects of the same age and sex not exposed to noise and in the remaining 7.8% were not statistically significant (p>0.05). In 3.9% of the cases the increases were bilateral, typical of noise-induced hearing loss, and only 1.9% showed involvement of several frequencies with worsening of expected thresholds >25 dB. In conclusion, our study showed that exposure to noise in dental laboratories was not sufficient to represent a hazard to hearing, as demonstrated by the LEX, 8 h, which were below 80 dB(A) and therefore below the European exposure limit values and exposure action values for workers.
噪声是职业医学中一个众所周知的风险因素。已经在存在噪声源的工作场所开展了多项研究,尤其是在工业领域;相反,仅有少数研究评估了小型工厂、手工艺实验室和牙科实验室等非工业工作场所的噪声暴露影响。本研究的目的是评估牙科技术人员的工作场所噪声暴露情况和听力阈值。该研究纳入了四个实验室和51名牙科技术人员。在所纳入的实验室中评估了名义8小时工作日期间的噪声暴露水平(LEX,8h)。对51名牙科技术人员进行了纯音听力测定的听阈测试,并将结果与未接触噪声的受试者预期结果进行了比较。环境噪声测量结果显示,四个实验室的LEX,8h存在中度差异(范围为71.4至76.2);LEX,8h的平均值为73.9±2.2dB(A)。听力测定结果显示,在主要受噪声性听力损失影响的频率(3、4和6kHz)处,听阈数值呈逐渐升高趋势,并且与年龄和工作年限相关,尤其是在男性中(p<0.005)。然而,92.1%的受试者阈值升高与未接触噪声的同年龄和同性别的受试者预期情况一致,其余7.8%无统计学意义(p>0.05)。在3.9%的病例中,阈值升高是双侧的,这是噪声性听力损失的典型表现,只有1.9%的病例显示多个频率受累且预期阈值恶化>25dB。总之,我们的研究表明,牙科实验室的噪声暴露不足以构成听力危害,LEX,8h低于80dB(A),因此低于欧洲工人的暴露限值和暴露行动值即可证明这一点。