• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用国家行政数据库跟踪糖尿病对医院再入院影响的仪表板原型

A Dashboard Prototype for Tracking the Impact of Diabetes on Hospital Readmissions Using a National Administrative Database.

作者信息

Wong Timothy, Brovman Ethan Y, Rao Nikhilesh, Tsai Mitchell H, Urman Richard D

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA.

Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Med Res. 2020 Jan;12(1):18-25. doi: 10.14740/jocmr4029. Epub 2020 Jan 6.

DOI:10.14740/jocmr4029
PMID:32010418
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6968923/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the past several decades, diabetes mellitus has contributed to a significant disease burden in the general population. Evidence suggests that patients with a coexisting diabetes diagnosis consume more hospital resources, and have higher readmission rates compared to those who do not. Against the backdrop of bundled-payment programs, healthcare systems cannot underestimate the importance of monitoring patient health information at the population level.

METHODS

Using the data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) administrative claims database, we created a dashboard prototype to enable hospitals to examine the impact of diabetes on their all-cause readmission rates and financial implications if diabetes was present at the index hospitalization. The technical design involved loading the relevant 10th revision of International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes provided by the medical team and flagging diabetes patients at the claim. These patients were then tagged for readmissions within the same database. The odds ratios were determined based on data from two groups: those with diabetes at index hospitalization which include type 1 only, type 2 only, and type 1 and type 2 diabetes, plus those without diabetes at index hospitalization.

RESULTS

The dashboard presents summary data of diabetes readmissions quality metrics at a national level. Users can visualize summary data of each state and compare odds ratios for readmissions as well as raw hospitalization data at their facility. Dashboard users can also view data classified by a diagnosis-related group (DRG) system. In addition to a "national" data view, for users who inquire about data specific to demographic regions, the DRG view can be further stratified at the state level or county level. At the DRG level, users can view data about the cost per readmissions for all index hospitalization with and without diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

The dashboard prototype offers users a virtual interface which displays visual data for quick interpretation, monitors changes at a population level, and enables administrators to benchmark facility data against local and national trends. This is an important step in using data analytics to drive population level decision making to ultimately improve medical systems.

摘要

背景

在过去几十年中,糖尿病给普通人群带来了沉重的疾病负担。有证据表明,与未患糖尿病的患者相比,同时患有糖尿病的患者消耗更多的医院资源,再入院率也更高。在捆绑支付计划的背景下,医疗系统不能低估在人群层面监测患者健康信息的重要性。

方法

利用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)行政索赔数据库的数据,我们创建了一个仪表板原型,以使医院能够检查糖尿病对其全因再入院率的影响,以及如果在首次住院时患有糖尿病所产生的财务影响。技术设计包括加载医疗团队提供的相关国际疾病分类第十版(ICD-10)代码,并在索赔中标记糖尿病患者。然后在同一数据库中对这些患者的再入院情况进行标记。根据两组数据确定比值比:首次住院时患有糖尿病的患者,包括仅1型糖尿病、仅2型糖尿病以及1型和2型糖尿病患者,以及首次住院时未患糖尿病的患者。

结果

该仪表板展示了全国范围内糖尿病再入院质量指标的汇总数据。用户可以直观看到每个州的汇总数据,并比较再入院的比值比以及其所在医疗机构的原始住院数据。仪表板用户还可以查看按诊断相关分组(DRG)系统分类的数据。除了“全国”数据视图外,对于询问特定人口区域数据的用户,DRG视图可以在州一级或县一级进一步分层。在DRG层面,用户可以查看所有有或无糖尿病的首次住院的每次再入院成本数据。

结论

仪表板原型为用户提供了一个虚拟界面,该界面显示可视化数据以便快速解读,在人群层面监测变化,并使管理人员能够根据当地和全国趋势对医疗机构数据进行基准对比。这是利用数据分析推动人群层面决策以最终改善医疗系统的重要一步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed96/6968923/4a37bbd07990/jocmr-12-018-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed96/6968923/b2e0ce2c152d/jocmr-12-018-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed96/6968923/0225492a674d/jocmr-12-018-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed96/6968923/d47b3174c1b7/jocmr-12-018-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed96/6968923/d6508e7e5b0c/jocmr-12-018-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed96/6968923/4a37bbd07990/jocmr-12-018-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed96/6968923/b2e0ce2c152d/jocmr-12-018-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed96/6968923/0225492a674d/jocmr-12-018-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed96/6968923/d47b3174c1b7/jocmr-12-018-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed96/6968923/d6508e7e5b0c/jocmr-12-018-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed96/6968923/4a37bbd07990/jocmr-12-018-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
A Dashboard Prototype for Tracking the Impact of Diabetes on Hospital Readmissions Using a National Administrative Database.使用国家行政数据库跟踪糖尿病对医院再入院影响的仪表板原型
J Clin Med Res. 2020 Jan;12(1):18-25. doi: 10.14740/jocmr4029. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
2
Which Clinical and Patient Factors Influence the National Economic Burden of Hospital Readmissions After Total Joint Arthroplasty?哪些临床和患者因素会影响全关节置换术后再入院的国家经济负担?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):2926-2937. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5244-6.
3
A Dashboard for Tracking Mortality After Cardiac Surgery Using a National Administrative Database.使用国家行政数据库跟踪心脏手术后死亡率的仪表板。
Cardiol Res. 2021 Apr;12(2):86-90. doi: 10.14740/cr1220. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
4
A Dashboard for Monitoring Opioid-Related Adverse Drug Events Following Surgery Using a National Administrative Database.使用国家行政数据库监测手术后阿片类药物相关不良药物事件的仪表板。
Am J Med Qual. 2019 Jan/Feb;34(1):45-52. doi: 10.1177/1062860618782646. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
5
How Much Does a Readmission Cost the Bundle Following Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty?初次髋关节和膝关节置换术后,再次入院治疗捆绑包的费用是多少?
J Arthroplasty. 2019 May;34(5):819-823. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.029. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
6
Defining the 90-day cost structure of lower extremity revascularization for alternative payment model assessment.定义下肢血运重建的 90 天成本结构,以评估替代支付模式。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Feb;73(2):662-673.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.06.050. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
7
Are we ready for bundled payments for major bowel surgery?我们是否已经准备好为主要肠道手术进行捆绑式支付?
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):4950-4956. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07287-8. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
8
Evaluation of hospital readmissions in surgical patients: do administrative data tell the real story?外科手术患者的再入院评估:行政数据能反映真实情况吗?
JAMA Surg. 2014 Aug;149(8):759-64. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.18.
9
An informatics-based approach to reducing heart failure all-cause readmissions: the Stanford heart failure dashboard.一种基于信息学的降低心力衰竭全因再入院率的方法:斯坦福心力衰竭仪表盘。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 May 1;24(3):550-555. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw150.
10
Six-month readmissions after bariatric surgery: Results of a nationwide analysis.减重手术后 6 个月的再入院率:一项全国性分析的结果。
Surgery. 2019 Nov;166(5):926-933. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Design, Application, and Actionability of US Public Health Data Dashboards: Scoping Review.美国公共卫生数据仪表盘的设计、应用与可操作性:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 21;27:e65283. doi: 10.2196/65283.
2
Using co-design to understand consumer's health information-seeking behaviours and design preferences for a new digital clinical dashboard in aged care.运用协同设计来了解消费者在老年护理中寻求健康信息的行为以及对新型数字临床仪表盘的设计偏好。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Dec 4;24(1):993. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05581-2.
3
A Dashboard for Tracking Mortality After Cardiac Surgery Using a National Administrative Database.

本文引用的文献

1
Increased Rates of Readmission, Reoperation, and Mortality Following Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures Are Associated With Diabetes Mellitus.踝关节骨折切开复位内固定术后再入院、再次手术及死亡率增加与糖尿病有关。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 May;58(3):470-474. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.09.023. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
2
Sooner is better: use of a real-time automated bedside dashboard improves sepsis care.越快越好:使用实时自动化床边仪表盘可改善脓毒症护理。
J Surg Res. 2018 Nov;231:373-379. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.05.078. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
3
A Dashboard for Monitoring Opioid-Related Adverse Drug Events Following Surgery Using a National Administrative Database.
使用国家行政数据库跟踪心脏手术后死亡率的仪表板。
Cardiol Res. 2021 Apr;12(2):86-90. doi: 10.14740/cr1220. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
使用国家行政数据库监测手术后阿片类药物相关不良药物事件的仪表板。
Am J Med Qual. 2019 Jan/Feb;34(1):45-52. doi: 10.1177/1062860618782646. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
4
Projection of the future diabetes burden in the United States through 2060.到2060年美国未来糖尿病负担的预测。
Popul Health Metr. 2018 Jun 15;16(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12963-018-0166-4.
5
Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2017.2017 年美国糖尿病的经济成本。
Diabetes Care. 2018 May;41(5):917-928. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0007. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
6
Quality Improvement in Anesthesiology - Leveraging Data and Analytics to Optimize Outcomes.麻醉学中的质量改进——利用数据与分析优化结果。
Anesthesiol Clin. 2018 Mar;36(1):31-44. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2017.10.006.
7
Association Between Type 2 Diabetes and All-Cause Hospitalization and Mortality in the UK General Heart Failure Population: Stratification by Diabetic Glycemic Control and Medication Intensification.2 型糖尿病与英国普通心力衰竭人群全因住院和死亡的相关性:按糖尿病血糖控制和药物强化分层。
JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Jan;6(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.08.020. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
8
The readmission rates in patients with versus those without diabetes mellitus at an urban teaching hospital.城市教学医院中糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者的再入院率。
J Diabetes Complications. 2017 Dec;31(12):1681-1685. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
9
The relationship between diabetes mellitus and 30-day readmission rates.糖尿病与30天再入院率之间的关系。
Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Mar 22;3:3. doi: 10.1186/s40842-016-0040-x. eCollection 2017.
10
An informatics-based approach to reducing heart failure all-cause readmissions: the Stanford heart failure dashboard.一种基于信息学的降低心力衰竭全因再入院率的方法:斯坦福心力衰竭仪表盘。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 May 1;24(3):550-555. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw150.