Dhindsa Banreet Singh, Dhaliwal Amaninder, Mohan Babu P, Mashiana Harmeet Singh, Girotra Mohit, Singh Shailender, Ohning Gordon, Bhat Ishfaq, Adler Douglas G
University of Nevada Las Vegas School of Medicine, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States.
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Feb;8(2):E163-E171. doi: 10.1055/a-1067-4411. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
Endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) is a new endoscopic procedure to perform ERCP in Roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate technical success, clinical success and adverse effects of EDGE and compare it to laparoscopic ERCP (LA-ERCP) and balloon ERCP (BE-ERCP). We conducted a comprehensive search of several databases and conference proceedings including PubMed, EMBASE, Google-Scholar, LILACS, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases to identify studies reporting on EDGE, LA-ERCP, and BE-ERCP. The primary outcome was to evaluate technical and clinical success of all three procedures and the secondary analysis focused on calculating the pooled rate of all adverse events (AEs), along with the commonly reported AE subtypes. Twenty-four studies on 1268 patients were included in our analysis with the majority of the population being males with mean age 53.72 years. Pooled rates of technical and clinical success with EDGE wer 95.5 % and 95.9 %, with LA-ERCP were 95.3 % and 92.9 % and were BE-ERCP were 71.4 % and 58.7 %, respectively. Pooled rates of all AEs with EDGE were 21.9 %, with LA-ERCP 17.4 % and with BE-ERCP 8.4 %. Stent migration was the most common AE with EDGE with 13.3 % followed by bleeding with 6.6 %. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the technical and clinical success of EDGE procedure is better than BE-ERCP and comparable to that of LA-ERCP in RYGB patients. EDGE also has a similar safety profile as compared to LA-ERCP but has higher AE rate as compared to BE-ERCP.
内镜超声引导下经胃逆行胰胆管造影术(EDGE)是一种在 Roux-en-y 胃旁路术(RYGB)患者中进行逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的新内镜操作。本研究的目的是进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估 EDGE 的技术成功率、临床成功率和不良反应,并将其与腹腔镜 ERCP(LA-ERCP)和气囊 ERCP(BE-ERCP)进行比较。我们对多个数据库和会议论文集进行了全面检索,包括 PubMed、EMBASE、谷歌学术、LILACS、SCOPUS 和科学网数据库,以识别报告 EDGE、LA-ERCP 和 BE-ERCP 的研究。主要结局是评估所有三种操作的技术和临床成功率,次要分析重点是计算所有不良事件(AE)的合并发生率以及常见报告的 AE 亚型。我们的分析纳入了 24 项针对 1268 名患者的研究,大多数患者为男性,平均年龄 53.72 岁。EDGE 的技术成功率和临床成功率合并率分别为 95.5%和 95.9%,LA-ERCP 分别为 95.3%和 92.9%,BE-ERCP 分别为 71.4%和 58.7%。EDGE 所有 AE 的合并发生率为 21.9%,LA-ERCP 为 17.4%,BE-ERCP 为 8.4%。支架移位是 EDGE 最常见的 AE,发生率为 13.3%;其次是出血,发生率为 6.6%。我们的荟萃分析表明,在 RYGB 患者中,EDGE 操作的技术和临床成功率优于 BE-ERCP,与 LA-ERCP 相当。与 LA-ERCP 相比,EDGE 的安全性也相似,但与 BE-ERCP 相比,AE 发生率更高。