Chen Xudong, Zhu Ante, Du Yiping P
School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Magn Reson Med. 2020 Aug;84(2):787-799. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28175. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
To develop a center-out echo planar imaging (COEPI) acquisition technique to increase SNR through minimizing the TE.
In single-shot COEPI, the phase-encoding starts from the center (k = 0) toward both sides of k-space to substantially shorten the TE compared to the conventional single-shot EPI. The phase-encoding gradient waveform is partially overlapped with the frequency-encoding gradient waveform to keep the echo spacing constant during the echo train readout. A reconstruction pipeline was developed to correct for phase and off-resonance errors in COEPI. Gradient-recalled echo (GRE), spin echo (SE), and DWI COEPI were obtained in phantoms and healthy brains at 1.5 tesla (T) and 3.0T. The SNR in COEPI and single-shot partial k EPI was compared.
Acquisition matrix of 128 × 80 (16 overscan lines) was obtained in both COEPI and EPI. At 1.5T/3.0T, a minimum TE of 3 ms/4 ms in GRE-COEPI, 11 ms/12 ms in SE-COEPI, and 40 ms in DWI-COEPI (3.0T only, maximum b value = 2000 s/mm ) was achieved, compared to a minimum TE of 18 ms/16 ms in GRE-EPI, 37 ms/34 ms in SE-EPI, and 66 ms in DWI-EPI, respectively. Image blurring and Nyquist ghost appear in COEPI and were substantially reduced after corrections. At 1.5T/3.0T, a SNR increase of 27.7% ± 6.9%/20.7% ± 7.0% in GRE-COEPI and 37.7% ± 5.7%/28.2% ± 1.3% in SE-COEPI was observed in white matter of human brains, compared to GRE-EPI and SE-EPI, respectively. At 3.0T, a SNR increase of 41.2% ± 4.1% in DWI-COEPI was observed in white matter of 5 subjects at 5 b values (0~2000 s/mm ), compared to DWI-EPI.
The feasibility of COEPI and its SNR benefit were demonstrated in this study.
开发一种中心向外回波平面成像(COEPI)采集技术,通过最小化回波时间(TE)来提高信噪比(SNR)。
在单次激发COEPI中,相位编码从中心(k = 0)开始向k空间两侧进行,与传统单次激发回波平面成像相比,可大幅缩短TE。相位编码梯度波形与频率编码梯度波形部分重叠,以在回波链读出期间保持回波间隔恒定。开发了一种重建流程来校正COEPI中的相位和失谐误差。在1.5特斯拉(T)和3.0T的体模和健康大脑中获得了梯度回波(GRE)、自旋回波(SE)和扩散加权成像(DWI)的COEPI。比较了COEPI和单次激发部分k空间回波平面成像中的SNR。
COEPI和回波平面成像均获得了128×80(16条过扫描线)的采集矩阵。在1.5T/3.0T时,GRE-COEPI的最小TE为3毫秒/4毫秒,SE-COEPI为11毫秒/12毫秒,DWI-COEPI(仅3.0T,最大b值 = 2000 s/mm²)为40毫秒,而GRE-回波平面成像的最小TE分别为18毫秒/16毫秒,SE-回波平面成像为37毫秒/34毫秒,DWI-回波平面成像为66毫秒。COEPI中出现图像模糊和奈奎斯特鬼影,校正后大幅减少。在1.5T/3.0T时,与GRE-回波平面成像和SE-回波平面成像相比,在人脑白质中观察到GRE-COEPI的SNR分别提高了27.7%±6.9%/20.7%±7.0%,SE-COEPI提高了37.7%±5.7%/28.2%±1.3%。在3.0T时,与DWI-回波平面成像相比,在5名受试者的白质中,在5个b值(0~2000 s/mm²)下观察到DWI-COEPI的SNR提高了41.2%±4.1%。
本研究证明了COEPI的可行性及其SNR优势。