• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较单激发回波平面成像和分段读出回波平面成像在 3 特斯拉肝脏扩散加权成像中的临床应用价值。

Comparing the clinical utility of single-shot echo-planar imaging and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver at 3 tesla.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China.

Siemens Healthcare Ltd, Guangzhou Branch, 510620, China.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2021 Feb;135:109472. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109472. Epub 2020 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109472
PMID:33370640
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical utility of single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI) using different breathing schemes and readout-segmented EPI (RS-EPI) in the repeatability of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and image quality.

METHODS

In this institutional review board-approved prospective study, hepatic DWIs (b = 50, 300, 600 s/mm) were performed in 22 volunteers on 3.0 T MRI using SS-EPI with free-breathing diffusion-weighted imaging (FB-DWI), breath-hold (BH-DWI), respiratory-triggered (RT-DWI) and navigator-triggered (NT-DWI), and readout-segmented EPI (RS-DWI). ADC and surrogate SNR (sSNR) were measured in nine anatomic locations in the right lobe, and image quality was assessed on all FB-DWI, BH-DWI, RT-DWI, NT-DWI, and RS-DWI sequences. The sequence with the optimal clinical utility was decided by systematically comparing the ADC repeatability, sSNR and image quality of the above DWIs.

RESULTS

In all the five sequences, NT-DWI had the most reliable intra-observer agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.900-0.922; all P > 0.05), and a better interobserver agreement (ICC: 0.853-0.960; all p > 0.05) than RS-DWI (ICC:0.881-0.916; some P < 0.05). NT-DWI had the best ADC repeatability in the nine locations (mean ADC absolute differences: 38.47-56.38 × 10 mm/s, limits of agreement (LOA): 17.33-22.52 × 10 mm/s). Also, NT-DWI had the highest sSNR (Reader 1: 50.58 ± 20.11 (Superior), 74.06 ± 28.37 (Central), 80.99 ± 38.11(Inferior)); Reader 2: 48.07 ± 23.92 (Superior), 68.23 ± 32.91 (Central), 76.78 ± 33.07 (Inferior)) in three representative sections except for RS-DWI. Furthermore, NT-DWI had a better image quality than RS-DWI (P < 0.05) and was superior to FB-DWI and BH-DWI in sharpness of the liver (at b = 300 s/mm) (P < 0.05) CONCLUSION: RS-DWI has the best SNR. However, NT-DWI can provide sufficient SNR, excellent image quality, and the best ADC repeatability on 3.0 T MRI. It is thus the recommended sequence for the clinical application of hepatic DWI.

摘要

目的

比较单次激发回波平面成像(SS-EPI)使用不同呼吸方案和分段读出 EPI(RS-EPI)在表观扩散系数(ADC)测量的重复性、信噪比(SNR)和图像质量方面的临床实用性。

方法

本研究为机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性研究,在 3.0T MRI 上对 22 名志愿者进行单次激发 EPI 弥散加权成像(SS-EPI),采用自由呼吸弥散加权成像(FB-DWI)、屏气(BH-DWI)、呼吸触发(RT-DWI)和导航触发(NT-DWI)以及分段读出 EPI(RS-DWI)。在右叶的 9 个解剖位置测量 ADC 和替代 SNR(sSNR),并对所有 FB-DWI、BH-DWI、RT-DWI、NT-DWI 和 RS-DWI 序列进行图像质量评估。通过系统比较上述 DWIs 的 ADC 重复性、sSNR 和图像质量,决定具有最佳临床实用性的序列。

结果

在所有 5 种序列中,NT-DWI 具有最可靠的观察者内一致性(组内相关系数(ICC):0.900-0.922;均 P>0.05),以及优于 RS-DWI 的观察者间一致性(ICC:0.853-0.960;均 P>0.05)。NT-DWI 在 9 个位置的 ADC 重复性最好(平均 ADC 绝对差异:38.47-56.38×10mm/s,一致性限(LOA):17.33-22.52×10mm/s)。此外,NT-DWI 具有最高的 sSNR(读者 1:50.58±20.11(上部),74.06±28.37(中部),80.99±38.11(下部);读者 2:48.07±23.92(上部),68.23±32.91(中部),76.78±33.07(下部)),除 RS-DWI 外,在三个代表性切片中均具有最高的 sSNR。此外,NT-DWI 具有比 RS-DWI 更好的图像质量(P<0.05),并且在肝脏清晰度方面优于 FB-DWI 和 BH-DWI(在 b=300s/mm 时)(P<0.05)。

结论

RS-DWI 具有最佳 SNR。然而,NT-DWI 可以在 3.0T MRI 上提供足够的 SNR、出色的图像质量和最佳的 ADC 重复性。因此,它是肝 DWI 临床应用的推荐序列。

相似文献

1
Comparing the clinical utility of single-shot echo-planar imaging and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver at 3 tesla.比较单激发回波平面成像和分段读出回波平面成像在 3 特斯拉肝脏扩散加权成像中的临床应用价值。
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Feb;135:109472. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109472. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
2
Comparing the clinical utility of single-shot, readout-segmented and zoomit echo-planar imaging in diffusion-weighted imaging of the kidney at 3 T.比较单次激发、分段读出和 Zoomit 回波平面成像在 3T 肾脏扩散加权成像中的临床应用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 20;12(1):12389. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16670-w.
3
Evaluation of simultaneous-multislice diffusion-weighted imaging of liver at 3.0 T with different breathing schemes.3.0T 不同呼吸方案下肝脏同时多层弥散加权成像的评估。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Nov;45(11):3716-3729. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02538-y.
4
Diffusion-Weighted MRI to Assess Sacroiliitis: Improved Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance of Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging (EPI) Over Conventional Single-Shot EPI.扩散加权 MRI 评估中轴型脊柱关节炎:分段读出回波平面成像(EPI)优于传统单次激发 EPI,可提高图像质量和诊断性能。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Aug;217(2):450-459. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23953. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
5
Readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging in the assessment of orbital tumors: comparison with conventional single-shot echo-planar imaging in image quality and diagnostic performance.读出分段回波平面扩散加权成像在眼眶肿瘤评估中的应用:与传统单次激发回波平面成像在图像质量和诊断性能方面的比较。
Acta Radiol. 2017 Dec;58(12):1457-1467. doi: 10.1177/0284185117695667. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
6
Image Quality and Geometric Distortion of Modern Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Sequences in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate.现代磁共振前列腺弥散加权成像序列的图像质量和几何变形。
Invest Radiol. 2018 Apr;53(4):200-206. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000429.
7
Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging improves the image quality of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in rectal cancer: Comparison with single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted sequences.读出分段回波平面成像改善直肠癌扩散加权磁共振成像的图像质量:与单次激发回波平面扩散加权序列的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Oct;85(10):1818-1823. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
8
Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in diffusion-weighted imaging of the kidney: comparison with single-shot echo-planar imaging in image quality.分段读出回波平面成像在肾脏扩散加权成像中的应用:与单次激发回波平面成像在图像质量方面的比较。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Jan;41(1):100-8. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0615-5.
9
Clinical comparison of single-shot EPI, readout-segmented EPI and TGSE-BLADE for diffusion-weighted imaging of cerebellopontine angle tumors on 3 tesla.3.0T 磁共振单次激发 EPI、分段读出 EPI 及 TGSE-BLADE 序列在桥小脑角肿瘤扩散加权成像中的临床对比研究。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Dec;84:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2021.09.009. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
10
Diagnostic value of multi-model high-resolution diffusion-weighted MR imaging in breast lesions: Based on simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented echo-planar imaging.多模态高分辨率弥散加权磁共振成像在乳腺病变中的诊断价值:基于同时多层分段读出回波平面成像。
Eur J Radiol. 2022 Sep;154:110439. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110439. Epub 2022 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging and single-shot echo-planar imaging in the fetal brain.读出分段回波平面成像与单次激发回波平面成像在胎儿脑部的比较。
Transl Pediatr. 2025 May 30;14(5):844-854. doi: 10.21037/tp-2025-77. Epub 2025 May 27.
2
Diffusion weighted imaging combining respiratory triggering and navigator echo tracking in the upper abdomen.弥散加权成像结合呼吸触发和导航回波跟踪在上腹部的应用。
MAGMA. 2024 Oct;37(5):873-886. doi: 10.1007/s10334-024-01150-1. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
3
Liver metastases: The role of magnetic resonance imaging.
肝转移瘤:磁共振成像的作用。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep 28;29(36):5180-5197. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i36.5180.
4
Performance of Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging in Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Rat Sciatic Nerve Compared With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging.大鼠坐骨神经扩散张量成像中单激发回波平面成像与读出分段回波平面成像的性能比较
Front Neurosci. 2022 May 12;16:844408. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.844408. eCollection 2022.
5
Associations between CT pulmonary opacity score on admission and clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with COVID-19.入院时 CT 肺部不透明度评分与 COVID-19 患者临床特征和结局的关系。
Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Jan;17(1):153-163. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02795-9. Epub 2021 Jun 30.