Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Tjongerschans Hospital, Heerenveen, The Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Apr;36(4):547-553. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1725743. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
We sought to investigate the reasons for, and rates of, novel oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy discontinuation. This was an observational cohort study of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) referred to a regional DOAC outpatient clinic between February 2013 and October 2017. The study population consisted of 875 consecutive patients with AF who visited the DOAC outpatient unit to initiate treatment with apixaban ( = 303), dabigatran ( = 267) or rivaroxaban ( = 305) for long-term ischemic stroke prophylaxis. All the patients came from the Leeuwarden Medical Center cardiology outpatient clinic, which offers a well structured and nurse-run DOAC unit in cooperation with the hospital's thrombosis service. This clinic operates according to the Dutch nationwide guidelines on integration of anticoagulation services. Overall rate of discontinuation was 11.9 per 100 patient-years of follow-up. Discontinuation rates for apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban were 8.1, 16.6 and 11.5 per 100 patient-years of follow-up.Apixaban had the lowest rate of discontinuation during the 36 month follow-up period. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban had high discontinuation rates during the 3-6 month period following DOAC therapy initiation. The main reasons for discontinuation of DOAC therapy were adverse side effects, patient-initiated discontinuation and any bleed. This was a retrospective and non-randomized study, and our results should be interpreted in light of these observations. DOAC discontinuation rates varied significantly and appeared related to drug-specific side effects, patient-initiated discontinuation and bleeding. We observed longer-term administration of apixaban, suggesting that this drug is better tolerated than dabigatran or rivaroxaban.
我们旨在探究新型口服抗凝药物(NOAC)停药的原因和停药率。这是一项观察性队列研究,纳入 2013 年 2 月至 2017 年 10 月期间在一个区域 NOAC 门诊就诊的心房颤动(AF)患者。研究人群为 875 例连续的 AF 患者,这些患者为了长期预防缺血性脑卒中,来门诊接受阿哌沙班( = 303)、达比加群( = 267)或利伐沙班( = 305)治疗。所有患者均来自吕伐登医疗中心心内科门诊,该门诊与医院血栓科合作,为 NOAC 门诊提供结构化的、护士主导的治疗。该门诊的运作符合荷兰全国性抗凝服务整合指南。总的停药率为每 100 患者-年 11.9 例。阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班的停药率分别为每 100 患者-年 8.1、16.6 和 11.5 例。阿哌沙班在 36 个月的随访期间停药率最低。达比加群和利伐沙班在开始 DOAC 治疗后 3-6 个月期间停药率较高。停药的主要原因是不良反应、患者自行停药和任何出血。这是一项回顾性和非随机研究,我们的结果应结合这些观察结果进行解释。NOAC 的停药率差异显著,且似乎与药物的特定不良反应、患者自行停药和出血有关。我们观察到阿哌沙班的长期使用,表明该药的耐受性优于达比加群或利伐沙班。