• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development of a Core Set of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Population-Based Cancer Survivorship Research: Protocol for an Australian Consensus Study.基于人群的癌症幸存者研究中患者报告结局的核心指标集的制定:一项澳大利亚共识研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jan 28;9(1):e14544. doi: 10.2196/14544.
2
A core set of patient-reported outcomes for population-based cancer survivorship research: a consensus study.基于人群的癌症生存者研究的核心患者报告结局集:一项共识研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Apr;15(2):201-212. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00924-5. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
3
Developing a Core Outcome Set for Prognostic Research in Palliative Cancer Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.制定姑息性癌症护理预后研究的核心结局集:一项混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Sep 1;12:e49774. doi: 10.2196/49774.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Core outcomes for pressure ulcer prevention trials: results of an international consensus study: Classification: Outcomes and qualitative research.压疮预防试验的核心结局:一项国际共识研究的结果:分类:结局与定性研究
Br J Dermatol. 2022 Nov;187(5):743-752. doi: 10.1111/bjd.21741. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
7
Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols: The SPIRIT-PRO Extension.患者报告结局纳入临床试验方案指南:SPIRIT-PRO 扩展
JAMA. 2018 Feb 6;319(5):483-494. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21903.
8
Core outcome research measures in anal cancer (CORMAC): protocol for systematic review, qualitative interviews and Delphi survey to develop a core outcome set in anal cancer.肛门癌核心结局研究指标(CORMAC):关于制定肛门癌核心结局集的系统评价、定性访谈和德尔菲调查方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 22;7(11):e018726. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018726.
9
A core outcome domain set for clinical research on capillary malformations (the COSCAM project): an e-Delphi process and consensus meeting.用于毛细管畸形临床研究的核心结局域集(COSCAM 项目):一项电子 Delphi 过程和共识会议。
Br J Dermatol. 2022 Nov;187(5):730-742. doi: 10.1111/bjd.21723. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
10
Vitiligo International Task force for an Agreed List of core data (VITAL): study protocol of a vitiligo core outcome set (COS) and contextual factors for clinical trials, registries, and clinical practice.白癜风国际工作组的一项核心数据共识清单(VITAL):一项白癜风核心结局集(COS)以及临床试验、注册和临床实践中相关因素的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Jul 23;23(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06497-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer survivorship programs for patients from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds: a scoping review.癌症康复计划服务于具有不同文化和语言背景(CALD)的患者:范围综述。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Dec;18(6):2052-2077. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01442-w. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
2
The effects of physical activity, fast-mimicking diet and psychological interventions on cancer survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.身体活动、模拟快速饮食和心理干预对癌症生存的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Complement Ther Med. 2021 Mar;57:102654. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102654. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
3
A core set of patient-reported outcomes for population-based cancer survivorship research: a consensus study.基于人群的癌症生存者研究的核心患者报告结局集:一项共识研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Apr;15(2):201-212. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00924-5. Epub 2020 Aug 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations.核心结局集-开发标准:COS-STAD建议
PLoS Med. 2017 Nov 16;14(11):e1002447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002447. eCollection 2017 Nov.
2
A randomized trial comparing three Delphi feedback strategies found no evidence of a difference in a setting with high initial agreement.一项比较三种德尔菲反馈策略的随机试验在初始一致性较高的环境中未发现差异的证据。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;93:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.09.024. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
3
The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.《COMET手册:第1.0版》
Trials. 2017 Jun 20;18(Suppl 3):280. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4.
4
Core outcome sets for research and clinical practice.核心结局集用于研究和临床实践。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2017 Mar-Apr;21(2):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
5
Cancer survivorship monitoring systems for the collection of patient-reported outcomes: a systematic narrative review of international approaches.用于收集患者报告结局的癌症幸存者监测系统:国际方法的系统叙述性综述
J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Aug;11(4):486-497. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0607-2. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
6
A core outcome set for localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials.局部前列腺癌疗效试验的核心结局集。
BJU Int. 2017 Nov;120(5B):E64-E79. doi: 10.1111/bju.13854. Epub 2017 May 3.
7
Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement.核心结局集报告标准:COS-STAR声明
PLoS Med. 2016 Oct 18;13(10):e1002148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002148. eCollection 2016 Oct.
8
Health-related problems in adult cancer survivors: development and validation of the Cancer Survivor Core Set.成年癌症幸存者的健康相关问题:癌症幸存者核心集的制定与验证
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Feb;25(2):567-574. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3439-0. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
9
Using the modified Delphi method to establish clinical consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with rotator cuff pathology.采用改良 Delphi 法对肩袖疾病患者的诊断与治疗达成临床共识。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 May 20;16:56. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0165-8.
10
Global Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates and Trends--An Update.全球癌症发病率、死亡率及趋势——最新情况
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Jan;25(1):16-27. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0578. Epub 2015 Dec 14.

基于人群的癌症幸存者研究中患者报告结局的核心指标集的制定:一项澳大利亚共识研究方案

Development of a Core Set of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Population-Based Cancer Survivorship Research: Protocol for an Australian Consensus Study.

作者信息

Ramsey Imogen, Corsini Nadia, Hutchinson Amanda D, Marker Julie, Eckert Marion

机构信息

Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery and UniSA Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.

School of Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jan 28;9(1):e14544. doi: 10.2196/14544.

DOI:10.2196/14544
PMID:32012089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7013638/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Core outcome sets seek to improve the consistency and quality of research by providing agreed-upon recommendations regarding what outcomes should be measured as a minimum for a population and setting. The problems arising from a lack of outcome standardization in population-based cancer survivorship research indicate the need for agreement on a core set of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to enhance data quality, consistency, and comparability.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify a core set of PROs, representing the most important issues impacting on cancer survivors' long-term health, functioning and quality of life, to inform population-based research on cancer survivorship.

METHODS

In Phase I, a list of all potentially important outcomes will be generated through focus group discussions with cancer survivors and a review of measures for assessing quality of life in cancer survivorship. The consolidated list will be advanced to Phase II, where a stakeholder consensus process will be conducted with national experts in cancer survivorship to refine and prioritize the outcomes into a core outcome set. The process will consist of a two-round Delphi survey and a consensus meeting. Cancer survivors, oncology health care professionals, and potential end users of the core outcome set with expertise in cancer survivorship research or policy will be invited to participate. In Phase III, recommended measures for assessment of the core outcome set will be selected with advice from experts on the assessment, analysis, and interpretation of PROs.

RESULTS

As of April 2019, data collection for Phase I is complete and data analysis is underway. These data will inform the list of outcomes to be advanced into Phase II. Recruitment for Phase II will commence in June 2019, and it is anticipated that it will take 6 months to complete the three-step consensus process and identify a provisional core outcome set. The study results are expected to be published in early 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

Expert consensus-driven recommendations on outcome measurement will facilitate the inclusion of survivorship outcomes considered important by cancer survivors and health professionals in future research. Adoption of the core outcome set will enable comparison and synthesis of evidence across studies and enhance the quality of PRO data collected in cancer survivorship research, particularly when applied to address macro-level questions.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/14544.

摘要

背景

核心结局集旨在通过就针对特定人群和研究背景应至少测量哪些结局提供商定的建议,来提高研究的一致性和质量。基于人群的癌症幸存者研究中因缺乏结局标准化而产生的问题表明,需要就一套核心患者报告结局(PROs)达成共识,以提高数据质量、一致性和可比性。

目的

本研究旨在确定一套核心PROs,代表影响癌症幸存者长期健康、功能和生活质量的最重要问题,为基于人群的癌症幸存者研究提供参考。

方法

在第一阶段,通过与癌症幸存者进行焦点小组讨论以及回顾评估癌症幸存者生活质量的测量方法,生成所有潜在重要结局的列表。合并后的列表将进入第二阶段,在该阶段将与癌症幸存者领域的国家专家进行利益相关者共识过程,以完善结局并将其优先排序为核心结局集。该过程将包括两轮德尔菲调查和一次共识会议。将邀请癌症幸存者、肿瘤医疗保健专业人员以及在癌症幸存者研究或政策方面具有专业知识的核心结局集潜在最终用户参与。在第三阶段,将在PROs评估、分析和解释方面的专家建议下,选择评估核心结局集的推荐测量方法。

结果

截至2019年4月,第一阶段的数据收集已完成,数据分析正在进行中。这些数据将为进入第二阶段的结局列表提供参考。第二阶段的招募将于2019年6月开始,预计将需要6个月完成三步共识过程并确定一个临时核心结局集。研究结果预计将于2020年初发表。

结论

由专家共识驱动的结局测量建议将有助于在未来研究中纳入癌症幸存者和卫生专业人员认为重要的幸存者结局。采用核心结局集将能够对各项研究的证据进行比较和综合,并提高癌症幸存者研究中收集的PRO数据的质量,特别是在应用于解决宏观层面问题时。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/14544