Suppr超能文献

制定姑息性癌症护理预后研究的核心结局集:一项混合方法研究的方案

Developing a Core Outcome Set for Prognostic Research in Palliative Cancer Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

作者信息

Spooner Caitlin, Vivat Bella, White Nicola, Stone Patrick

机构信息

Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Sep 1;12:e49774. doi: 10.2196/49774.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies exploring the impact of receiving end-of-life prognoses in patients with advanced cancer use a variety of different measures to evaluate the outcomes, and thus report often conflicting findings. The standardization of outcomes reported in studies of prognostication in palliative cancer care could enable uniform assessment and reporting, as well as intertrial comparisons. A core outcome set promotes consistency in outcome selection and reporting among studies within a particular population. We aim to develop a set of core outcomes to be used to measure the impact of end-of-life prognostication in palliative cancer care.

OBJECTIVE

This protocol outlines the proposed methodology to develop a core outcome set for measuring the impact of end-of-life prognostication in palliative cancer care.

METHODS

We will adopt a mixed methods approach consisting of 3 phases using methodology recommended by the Core Outcome Measure in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative. In phase I, we will conduct a systematic review to identify existing outcomes that prognostic studies have previously used, so as to inform the development of items and domains for the proposed core outcome set. Phase II will consist of semistructured interviews with patients with advanced cancer who are receiving palliative care, informal caregivers, and clinicians, to explore their perceptions and experiences of end-of-life prognostication. Outcomes identified in the interviews will be combined with those found in existing literature and taken forward to phase III, a Delphi survey, in which we will ask patients, informal caregivers, clinicians, and relevant researchers to rate these outcomes until consensus is achieved as to which are considered to be the most important for inclusion in the core outcome set. The resulting, prioritized outcomes will be discussed in a consensus meeting to agree and endorse the final core outcome set.

RESULTS

Ethical approval was received for this study in September 2022. As of July 2023, we have completed and published the systematic review (phase I) and have started recruitment for phase II. Data analysis for phase II has not yet started. We expect to complete the study by October 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

This protocol presents the stepwise approach that will be taken to develop a core outcome set for measuring the impact of end-of-life prognostication in palliative cancer care. The final core outcome set has the potential for translation into clinical practice, allowing for consistent evaluation of emerging prognostic algorithms and improving communication of end-of-life prognostication. This study will also potentially facilitate the design of future clinical trials of the impact of end-of-life prognostication in palliative care that are acceptable to key stakeholders.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials 2136; https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/2136.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/49774.

摘要

背景

探索晚期癌症患者接受临终预后的影响的研究使用了各种不同的指标来评估结果,因此报告的结果常常相互矛盾。姑息性癌症护理预后研究中报告的结果标准化能够实现统一的评估和报告,以及试验间的比较。核心结局集可促进特定人群中各项研究在结局选择和报告方面的一致性。我们旨在制定一套核心结局指标,用于衡量姑息性癌症护理中临终预后的影响。

目的

本方案概述了为衡量姑息性癌症护理中临终预后的影响而制定核心结局集的拟议方法。

方法

我们将采用混合方法,包括三个阶段,使用有效性试验核心结局指标(COMET)倡议推荐的方法。在第一阶段,我们将进行系统综述,以确定预后研究之前使用过的现有结局指标,为拟议的核心结局集的条目和领域的制定提供参考。第二阶段将包括对接受姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者、非正式照护者和临床医生进行半结构化访谈,以探讨他们对临终预后的看法和经历。访谈中确定的结局指标将与现有文献中发现的指标相结合,并推进到第三阶段,即德尔菲调查,我们将要求患者、非正式照护者、临床医生和相关研究人员对这些结局指标进行评分,直到就哪些指标被认为对纳入核心结局集最为重要达成共识。最终确定的、按优先级排列的结局指标将在共识会议上进行讨论,以商定并认可最终的核心结局集。

结果

本研究于2022年9月获得伦理批准。截至2023年7月,我们已完成并发表了系统综述(第一阶段),并已开始第二阶段的招募工作。第二阶段的数据分析尚未开始。我们预计在2024年10月完成该研究。

结论

本方案介绍了为衡量姑息性癌症护理中临终预后的影响而制定核心结局集将采取的逐步方法。最终的核心结局集有可能转化为临床实践,从而能够对新出现的预后算法进行一致的评估,并改善临终预后的沟通。本研究还可能促进未来关于姑息性护理中临终预后影响的临床试验的设计,使其为关键利益相关者所接受。

试验注册

有效性试验核心结局指标2136;https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/2136。

国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/49774。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0037/10504625/aadf32aa3460/resprot_v12i1e49774_fig1.jpg

相似文献

2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Development of a core outcome set and core measurement set for kangaroo mother care: a study protocol.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):e089476. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089476.
5
Outcomes of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: A qualitative study to inform a Core Outcome Set.
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0306717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306717. eCollection 2024.
6
The NeoPACE study: study protocol for the development of a core outcome set for neonatal palliative care.
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Dec 19;22(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01326-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: A qualitative study to inform a Core Outcome Set.
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0306717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306717. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021 Sep;74(9):790-799. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2021.07.010.
2
A systematic review finds Core Outcome Set uptake varies widely across different areas of health.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:114-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.029. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
4
Prognostication in palliative care.
Clin Med (Lond). 2019 Jul;19(4):306-310. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-4-306.
6
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
7
Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement.
Trials. 2019 Feb 11;20(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3230-x.
8
Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;108:110-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.12.010. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
9
Bereaved parents' experiences of research participation.
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Nov 7;17(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0375-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验