Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Motion in Brains Research Group, Institute of Neuroscience and Sciences of the Movement (INCIMOV), Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
J Oral Rehabil. 2020 May;47(5):620-635. doi: 10.1111/joor.12942. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
The main objective was to evaluate the effects of action observation (AO), visual mirror feedback (VMF) and motor imagery (MI), combined with an oro-facial exercise programme, on sensorimotor variables in asymptomatic participants.
We designed a randomised, single-blind, controlled trial that included 52 asymptomatic participants who were randomly assigned to 4 groups, 13 to each of the VMF, MI and AO groups and 13 to the control group (CG), which only performed the exercise programme. The primary outcomes were pain pressure sensitivity and tongue muscle strength. The secondary outcomes were maximum mouth opening, tongue length and the ability to generate mental motor images. Each group underwent a 3-session intervention using their respective exercise. Measurements were performed before starting the intervention and after each of the 3 sessions (pre, mid1, mid2 and post).
ANOVA revealed significant changes in PPTs in the masseter muscle region in the MI and AO groups in the pre-post and mid1-post changes. ANOVA revealed significant differences in tongue muscle strength in the anterior direction only in the AO group in the pre-mid2 and pre-post changes.
AO and MI, in conjunction with exercise, could induce changes in PPTs for the masseter muscle. In addition, only AO produced changes in tongue muscle strength. More research is needed to determine the role of brain representation techniques in the oro-facial region and transferring this exercise to the rehabilitation setting.
主要目的是评估结合口面部运动训练,对无症状参与者的感觉运动变量进行动作观察(AO)、视觉镜像反馈(VMF)和运动想象(MI)的效果。
我们设计了一项随机、单盲、对照试验,纳入了 52 名无症状参与者,他们被随机分配到 4 个组,VMF 组、MI 组和 AO 组各 13 人,对照组(CG)仅进行运动训练,共 13 人。主要结局指标为疼痛压力敏感性和舌肌力量。次要结局指标为最大张口度、舌长和产生心理运动意象的能力。每组采用各自的运动进行 3 次干预。在干预前和 3 次干预后的每个时间点(前、中 1、中 2 和后)进行测量。
方差分析显示,MI 和 AO 组在干预前后和中 1 后变化中,咬肌的 PPT 有显著变化。仅在 AO 组,在干预前-中 2 和干预前-后变化中,前向舌肌力量有显著差异。
AO 和 MI 结合运动可以引起咬肌 PPT 的变化。此外,只有 AO 引起了舌肌力量的变化。需要进一步研究来确定脑代表技术在口面区域的作用,并将这种运动转移到康复环境中。