Kreidieh Dima, Itani Leila, Tannir Hana, El Masri Dana, El Ghoch Marwan
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Beirut Arab University, P.O. Box 11-5020 Riad El Solh, Beirut 11072809, Lebanon.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2020 Jan 27;7(1):5. doi: 10.3390/jcdd7010005.
Attrition is a major cause of failure in obesity treatment, which is still not fully understood. The identification of factors related to this outcome is of clinical relevance. We aimed to assess the relationship between sarcopenic obesity (SO) and early attrition. Early attrition was assessed at six months, and two groups of patients were selected from a large cohort of participants with overweight or obesity enrolled at the Outpatient Clinic of the Department of Nutrition and Dietetics at Beirut Arab University (Lebanon). Body composition was measured using a bioimpedance analyser (Tanita BC-418) and participants at baseline were categorized as having or not having SO. The "dropout group" included 72 participants (cases) compared to 31 participants (controls) in the "completer group", with the former displaying a higher prevalence of SO than the latter (51.0% vs. 25.8%; p = 0.016). In the same direction, Poisson regression analysis showed that SO increased the relative risk of dropout by nearly 150% (RR = 1.45; 95% CI = 1.10-1.89; p = 0.007) after adjustment for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), age at first dieting, sedentary habits and weight-loss expectation. In conclusion, n a "real-world" outpatient clinical setting, the presence of SO at baseline increases the risk of dropout at six months. New directions of future research should be focused on identifying new strategies to reduce the attrition rate in this population.
退出是肥胖治疗失败的一个主要原因,对此仍未完全了解。确定与这一结果相关的因素具有临床意义。我们旨在评估肌肉减少性肥胖(SO)与早期退出之间的关系。在六个月时评估早期退出情况,从黎巴嫩贝鲁特阿拉伯大学营养与饮食学系门诊招募的一大群超重或肥胖参与者中选取两组患者。使用生物电阻抗分析仪(Tanita BC - 4l8)测量身体成分,基线时的参与者被分类为患有或未患有SO。“退出组”包括72名参与者(病例),而“完成组”有31名参与者(对照),前者的SO患病率高于后者(51.0%对25.8%;p = 0.016)。同样,在对年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、首次节食年龄、久坐习惯和减肥期望进行调整后,泊松回归分析表明,SO使退出的相对风险增加了近150%(RR = 1.45;95% CI = 1.10 - 1.89;p = 0.007)。总之,在“现实世界”的门诊临床环境中,基线时存在SO会增加六个月时退出的风险。未来研究的新方向应集中在确定降低该人群退出率的新策略上。