Chrcanovic Bruno Ramos, Cruz Aline Fernanda, Trindade Ricardo, Gomez Ricardo Santiago
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, 214 21 Malmö, Sweden.
Department of Oral Surgery and Pathology, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Jan 27;56(2):53. doi: 10.3390/medicina56020053.
To integrate the available published data on patients with oral lichen planus (OLP) rehabilitated with dental implants, as well as to review the recommendations for OLP patients receiving implants. : An electronic search was undertaken in February 2019 using five databases. Publications reporting cases of patients with OLP and rehabilitated with implant-supported oral prosthesis were included. : Twenty-two publications were included (230 patients, 615 implants). The overall implant failure rate was 13.9% (85/610). In patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) the failure rate was 90.6% (29/32), but none of these implants lost osseointegration; instead, the implants were removed together with the tumor. One study presented a very high implant failure rate, 76.4% (42/55), in patients with "active lichen planus", with all implants failing between 7-16 weeks after implant placement, and its conflicting and incongruent results are discussed in detail. There was a statistically significant difference between the failure rates in implants installed in different jaws (maxilla/mandible) and when implants of different surfaces were used (turned/moderately rough), but not between patients with reticular or erosive OLP types, or between male and female patients. If OSCC patients and the cases of the latter study are not considered, then the failure rate becomes very low (2.7%, 14/523). The time between implant placement and failure was 25.4 ± 32.6 months (range 1-112). The mean ± SD follow-up was 58.9 ± 26.7 months (1-180). : When the results of the one study with a very high failure rate and of the cases that developed OSCC are not considered, the dental implant failure rate in OLP patients was 2.7% after a follow-up of approximately five years. Recommendations are given when treating OLP patients with dental implants.
整合已发表的关于接受牙种植体修复的口腔扁平苔藓(OLP)患者的可用数据,并回顾针对接受种植体的OLP患者的建议。:2019年2月使用五个数据库进行了电子检索。纳入报告OLP患者病例并接受种植体支持的口腔修复体修复的出版物。:纳入了22篇出版物(230例患者,615颗种植体)。总体种植体失败率为13.9%(85/610)。在口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)患者中,失败率为90.6%(29/32),但这些种植体均未丧失骨结合;相反,种植体与肿瘤一起被切除。一项研究显示,“活动性扁平苔藓”患者的种植体失败率非常高,为76.4%(42/55),所有种植体在植入后7至16周内均失败,并且对其相互矛盾和不一致的结果进行了详细讨论。在不同颌骨(上颌/下颌)植入的种植体以及使用不同表面(光滑/中等粗糙)的种植体的失败率之间存在统计学显著差异,但在网状或糜烂性OLP类型的患者之间,或男性和女性患者之间不存在差异。如果不考虑OSCC患者和后一项研究的病例,则失败率变得非常低(2.7%,14/523)。种植体植入与失败之间的时间为25.4±32.6个月(范围1至112个月)。平均±标准差随访时间为58.9±26.7个月(1至180个月)。:当不考虑失败率非常高的一项研究的结果和发生OSCC的病例时,在大约五年的随访后,OLP患者的牙种植体失败率为2.7%。给出了用牙种植体治疗OLP患者时的建议。