• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用微型阶距规评估 3D 光学扫描仪的性能,并评估新型增材制造工艺的准确性。

Use of Miniature Step Gauges to Assess the Performance of 3D Optical Scanners and to Evaluate the Accuracy of a Novel Additive Manufacture Process.

机构信息

Department of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Politecnico di Bari, Via Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet 425, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jan 29;20(3):738. doi: 10.3390/s20030738.

DOI:10.3390/s20030738
PMID:32013208
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7038530/
Abstract

In this work, we show how miniature step gauges featuring unidirectional and bidirectional lengths can be used to assess the performance of 3D optical scanners as well as the accuracy of novel Additive Manufacturing (AM) processes. A miniature step gauge made of black polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) was used for the performance verification of three different optical scanners: a structured light scanner (SLS), a laser line scanner (LLS), and a photogrammetry-based scanner (PSSRT), having comparable resolutions and working volumes. Results have shown a good agreement between the involved scanners, with errors below 5 μm and expanded uncertainties below 10 μm. The step gauge geometry due to the bidirectional lengths, highlights that there is a different interaction between the optical properties of the step gauge under measurement and each optical instrument involved and this aspect has to be considered in the uncertainty budget. The same geometry, due to its great significance in the detection of systematic errors, was used, as a novelty, to evaluate the accuracy of Lithography-based Ceramics Manufacturing (LCM), a proprietary additive manufacturing technology used for the fabrication of medical implants. In particular, two miniature step gauges made of Tricalcium Phosphate (TCP) were produced. Measurements conducted with the SLS scanner were characterized by a negligible error and by an uncertainty of about 5 μm. Deviations of the manufactured step gauges with respect to the Computer Aided Designed (CAD) model were comprised between ±50 μm, with positive deviations in the order of 100 μm on vertical sides. Differences in the order of 50 μm between the two step gauges were registered.

摘要

在这项工作中,我们展示了如何使用具有单向和双向长度的微型台阶规来评估 3D 光学扫描仪的性能以及新型增材制造 (AM) 工艺的准确性。使用由黑色聚苯硫醚 (PPS) 制成的微型台阶规来验证三种不同的光学扫描仪的性能:结构光扫描仪 (SLS)、激光线扫描仪 (LLS) 和基于摄影测量的扫描仪 (PSSRT),它们具有可比的分辨率和工作体积。结果表明,所涉及的扫描仪之间具有很好的一致性,误差低于 5μm,扩展不确定度低于 10μm。由于双向长度,台阶规的几何形状突出了在测量中的台阶规的光学特性与每个涉及的光学仪器之间存在不同的相互作用,这一方面必须在不确定度预算中考虑。由于其在检测系统误差方面的重要意义,相同的几何形状被用作新颖性,用于评估基于光刻的陶瓷制造 (LCM) 的准确性,这是一种专有的增材制造技术,用于制造医疗植入物。特别是,制作了两个由磷酸三钙 (TCP) 制成的微型台阶规。使用 SLS 扫描仪进行的测量具有可忽略的误差和约 5μm 的不确定度。与计算机辅助设计 (CAD) 模型相比,制造的台阶规的偏差在±50μm 之间,垂直侧面的正偏差在 100μm 左右。两个台阶规之间记录了 50μm 左右的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/f3b84993c392/sensors-20-00738-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/0af52c3df2c7/sensors-20-00738-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/eaeab19e3009/sensors-20-00738-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/b49d798187d5/sensors-20-00738-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/57c5626961f5/sensors-20-00738-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/acd1c430143b/sensors-20-00738-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/1bfdf1b161b5/sensors-20-00738-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/ced08a662008/sensors-20-00738-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/07dcd8e970bb/sensors-20-00738-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/a3e2c1f0ee4b/sensors-20-00738-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/7cac678d1abc/sensors-20-00738-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/1b1e4dd69eb2/sensors-20-00738-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/008b2422d5f5/sensors-20-00738-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/5a5d09d87b03/sensors-20-00738-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/fe9804668e19/sensors-20-00738-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/a2d39d6b7224/sensors-20-00738-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/f3b84993c392/sensors-20-00738-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/0af52c3df2c7/sensors-20-00738-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/eaeab19e3009/sensors-20-00738-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/b49d798187d5/sensors-20-00738-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/57c5626961f5/sensors-20-00738-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/acd1c430143b/sensors-20-00738-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/1bfdf1b161b5/sensors-20-00738-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/ced08a662008/sensors-20-00738-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/07dcd8e970bb/sensors-20-00738-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/a3e2c1f0ee4b/sensors-20-00738-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/7cac678d1abc/sensors-20-00738-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/1b1e4dd69eb2/sensors-20-00738-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/008b2422d5f5/sensors-20-00738-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/5a5d09d87b03/sensors-20-00738-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/fe9804668e19/sensors-20-00738-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/a2d39d6b7224/sensors-20-00738-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79fe/7038530/f3b84993c392/sensors-20-00738-g016.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of Miniature Step Gauges to Assess the Performance of 3D Optical Scanners and to Evaluate the Accuracy of a Novel Additive Manufacture Process.使用微型阶距规评估 3D 光学扫描仪的性能,并评估新型增材制造工艺的准确性。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jan 29;20(3):738. doi: 10.3390/s20030738.
2
Influence of scanner, powder application, and adjustments on CAD-CAM crown misfit.扫描仪、粉末施加和调整对 CAD-CAM 冠适配不良的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Mar;119(3):377-383. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.024. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
3
In vitro precision of fit of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing titanium and zirconium dioxide bars.计算机辅助设计与计算机辅助制造的钛及二氧化锆棒体外贴合精度
Dent Mater. 2013 Sep;29(9):945-53. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
4
Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis.4款口内扫描仪的扫描准确性和精度:基于三维分析的体外比较
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Dec;112(6):1461-71. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.027. Epub 2014 Aug 16.
5
Additive Manufacturing: A Comparative Analysis of Dimensional Accuracy and Skin Texture Reproduction of Auricular Prostheses Replicas.增材制造:耳赝复体复制件的尺寸精度和皮肤纹理再现的比较分析。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):e460-e468. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12681. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
6
Precision of fit of implant-supported screw-retained 10-unit computer-aided-designed and computer-aided-manufactured frameworks made from zirconium dioxide and titanium: an in vitro study.二氧化锆和钛计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造的 10 单位种植体支持螺钉固位框架的拟合精度:一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Feb;25(2):165-74. doi: 10.1111/clr.12039. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
7
Layer Contour Verification in Additive Manufacturing by Means of Commercial Flatbed Scanners.商业平板扫描仪在增材制造中的层轮廓验证。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Dec 18;20(1):1. doi: 10.3390/s20010001.
8
Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts.三维计算机辅助制造单牙种植体最终印模的准确性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Dec;120(6):913-918. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
9
Effect of simulated intraoral variables on the accuracy of a photogrammetric imaging technique for complete-arch implant prostheses.模拟口腔内变量对全口种植体修复体摄影测量成像技术准确性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Aug;120(2):232-241. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.11.002. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
10
In vitro comparison of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of six extraoral dental scanners with different scanning technologies.六种采用不同扫描技术的口外牙科扫描仪准确性(真实性和精密度)的体外比较
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Oct;116(4):543-550.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.025. Epub 2016 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-Dimensional-Scanning of Pipe Inner Walls Based on Line Laser.基于线激光的管道内壁三维扫描
Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 31;24(11):3554. doi: 10.3390/s24113554.
2
Laser Triangulation Sensors Performance in Scanning Different Materials and Finishes.激光三角测量传感器在扫描不同材料和表面处理时的性能
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Apr 10;24(8):2410. doi: 10.3390/s24082410.
3
Testing the Sandblasting Process in the Manufacturing of Reference Spheres for Non-Contact Metrology Applications.测试用于非接触计量应用的参考球制造中的喷砂工艺。

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons.评估 7 种数字扫描仪的准确性:基于三维比较的体外分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jul;118(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.024. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
2
Accuracy evaluation of a lower-cost and four higher-cost laser scanners.一款低成本激光扫描仪和四款高成本激光扫描仪的准确性评估
J Biomech. 2016 Jan 4;49(1):127-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.11.015. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
Materials (Basel). 2021 Sep 9;14(18):5187. doi: 10.3390/ma14185187.
4
Analysis of Modern Optical Inspection Systems for Parts Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting.用于选择性激光熔化制造零件的现代光学检测系统分析
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun 4;20(11):3202. doi: 10.3390/s20113202.