Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
J Biol Rhythms. 2020 Jun;35(3):302-316. doi: 10.1177/0748730420901939. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
The daily proportion of light and dark hours (photoperiod) changes annually and plays an important role in the synchronization of seasonal biological phenomena, such as reproduction, hibernation, and migration. In mammals, the first step of photoperiod transduction occurs in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), the circadian pacemaker that also coordinates 24-h activity rhythms. Thus, in parallel with its role in annual synchronization, photoperiod variation acutely shapes day/night activity patterns, which vary throughout the year. Systematic studies of this behavioral modulation help understand the mechanisms behind its transduction at the SCN level. To explain how entrainment mechanisms could account for daily activity patterns under different photoperiods, Colin Pittendrigh and Serge Daan proposed a conceptual model in which the pacemaker would be composed of 2 coupled, evening (E) and morning (M), oscillators. Although the E-M model has existed for more than 40 years now, its physiological bases are still not fully resolved, and it has not been tested quantitatively under different photoperiods. To better explore the implications of the E-M model, we performed computer simulations of 2 coupled limit-cycle oscillators. Four model configurations were exposed to systematic variation of skeleton photoperiods, and the resulting daily activity patterns were assessed. The criterion for evaluating different model configurations was the successful reproduction of 2 key behavioral phenomena observed experimentally: activity psi-jumps and photoperiod-induced changes in activity phase duration. We compared configurations with either separate light inputs to E and M or the same light inputs to both oscillators. The former replicated experimental results closely, indicating that the configuration with separate E and M light inputs is the mechanism that best reproduces the effects of different skeleton photoperiods on day/night activity patterns. We hope this model can contribute to the search for E and M and their light input organization in the SCN.
昼夜时长(光周期)的日变化比例每年都在变化,在生殖、冬眠和迁徙等季节性生物现象的同步中起着重要作用。在哺乳动物中,光周期转导的第一步发生在视交叉上核(SCN),即协调 24 小时活动节律的生物钟。因此,光周期的变化除了在年度同步中发挥作用外,还能急性地塑造全年的日夜活动模式。对这种行为调节的系统研究有助于了解其在 SCN 水平上转导的机制。为了解释同步机制如何解释不同光周期下的日常活动模式,Colin Pittendrigh 和 Serge Daan 提出了一个概念模型,其中生物钟由 2 个耦合的、晚上(E)和早上(M)振荡器组成。尽管 E-M 模型已经存在了 40 多年,但它的生理基础仍未完全解决,并且在不同的光周期下尚未进行定量测试。为了更好地探索 E-M 模型的意义,我们对 2 个耦合的极限环振荡器进行了计算机模拟。四个模型配置暴露于系统变化的骨架光周期下,评估由此产生的日常活动模式。评估不同模型配置的标准是成功再现实验中观察到的 2 个关键行为现象:活动 psi-jumps 和光周期诱导的活动相位持续时间变化。我们比较了具有单独的 E 和 M 光输入或相同的光输入到两个振荡器的配置。前者紧密复制了实验结果,表明具有单独的 E 和 M 光输入的配置是最佳的,它能最佳地再现不同骨架光周期对日夜活动模式的影响。我们希望这个模型能够有助于寻找 SCN 中的 E 和 M 及其光输入组织。