Faculty of Medicine, School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Feb 26;63(2):569-584. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00271. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
Purpose Better performance for actions compared to objects has been reported in the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA). This study investigated the influence of the assessment task (naming, semantic picture matching) over the dissociation between objects and actions. Method Ten individuals with svPPA and 17 matched controls completed object and action naming tests, and object and action semantic picture matching tests. Performance was compared between the svPPA and control groups, within the svPPA group, and for each participant with svPPA versus the control group individually. Results Compared to controls, participants with svPPA were impaired on object and action naming, and object and action semantic picture matching. As a group, participants with svPPA had an advantage for actions over objects and for semantic picture matching tests over naming tests. Eight participants had a better performance for actions compared to objects in naming, with three showing a significant difference. Nine participants had a better performance for actions compared to objects in semantic picture matching, with six showing a significant difference. For objects, semantic picture matching was better than naming in nine participants, with five showing a significant difference. For actions, semantic picture matching was better than naming in all 10 participants, with nine showing a significant difference. Conclusion The nonverbal processing of actions, as assessed with a semantic picture matching test, is an area of relative strength in svPPA. Clinical implications for assessment planning and interpretation and theoretical implications for current models of semantic cognition are discussed.
与物体相比,语义型原发性进行性失语症(svPPA)患者在动作上的表现优于物体。本研究调查了评估任务(命名、语义图片匹配)对物体和动作之间的分离的影响。
10 名 svPPA 患者和 17 名匹配的对照组完成了物体和动作命名测试以及物体和动作语义图片匹配测试。比较了 svPPA 组和对照组之间、svPPA 组内以及每个 svPPA 患者与对照组之间的表现。
与对照组相比,svPPA 患者在物体和动作命名以及物体和动作语义图片匹配方面存在障碍。作为一个整体,svPPA 患者在动作上优于物体,在语义图片匹配测试上优于命名测试。8 名参与者在命名测试中动作表现优于物体,其中 3 名表现出显著差异。9 名参与者在语义图片匹配测试中动作表现优于物体,其中 6 名表现出显著差异。对于物体,在 9 名参与者中,语义图片匹配优于命名,其中 5 名表现出显著差异。对于动作,在所有 10 名参与者中,语义图片匹配优于命名,其中 9 名表现出显著差异。
在 svPPA 中,通过语义图片匹配测试评估的动作的非语言处理是一个相对较强的领域。讨论了对评估计划和解释的临床意义以及当前语义认知模型的理论意义。