• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于聚类的分层方法可最小化信号检测中的数据掩蔽效应。

A stratification method based on clustering for the minimization of data masking effect in signal detection.

机构信息

School of Internet of Things, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing, 210003, China.

Jiangsu Center for ADR Monitoring, Nanjing, 210002, China.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Feb 3;20(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1037-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-020-1037-z
PMID:32013983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6998200/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data masking is an inborn defect of measures of disproportionality in adverse drug reactions (ADRs) signal detection. Many previous studies can be roughly classified into three categories: data removal, regression and stratification. However, frequency differences of adverse drug events (ADEs) reports, which would be an important factor of masking, were not considered in these methods. The aim of this study is to explore a novel stratification method for minimizing the impact of frequency differences on real signals masking.

METHODS

Reports in the Chinese Spontaneous Reporting Database (CSRD) between 2010 and 2011 were selected. The overall dataset was stratified into some clusters by the frequency of drugs, ADRs, and drug-event combinations (DECs) in sequence. K-means clustering was used to conduct stratification according to data distribution characteristics. The Information Component (IC) was adopted for signal detection in each cluster respectively. By extracting ADRs from drug product labeling, a reference database was introduced for performance evaluation based on Recall, Precision and F-measure. In addition, some DECs from the Adverse Drug Reactions Information Bulletin (ADRIB) issued by CFDA were collected for further reliability evaluation.

RESULTS

With stratification, the study dataset was divided into 21 clusters, among which the frequency of DRUGs, ADRs or DECs followed the similar order of magnitude respectively. Recall increased by 34.95% from 29.93 to 40.39%, Precision reduced by 10.52% from 54.56 to 48.82%, while F-measure increased by 14.39% from 38.65 to 44.21%. According to ADRIB after 2011, 5 DECs related to Potassium Magnesium Aspartate, 61 DECs related to Levofloxacin Hydrochloride and 26 DECs related to Cefazolin were highlighted.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed method is effectively and reliably for the minimization of data masking effect in signal detection. Considering the decrease of Precision, it is suggested to be a supplement rather than an alternative to non-stratification method.

摘要

背景

数据掩蔽是药物不良反应(ADR)信号检测中比例失调度量的固有缺陷。许多先前的研究大致可以分为三类:数据删除、回归和分层。然而,这些方法并未考虑到不良药物事件(ADE)报告的频率差异,这将是掩蔽的一个重要因素。本研究旨在探索一种新的分层方法,以最小化频率差异对真实信号掩蔽的影响。

方法

选择了 2010 年至 2011 年中国自发报告数据库(CSRD)中的报告。该数据集首先根据药物、ADR 和药物事件组合(DEC)的频率顺序分层为一些簇。K-均值聚类根据数据分布特征进行分层。分别采用信息分量(IC)在每个簇中进行信号检测。通过从药品标签中提取 ADR,引入参考数据库,根据召回率、精度和 F 度量进行性能评估。此外,还收集了 CFDA 发布的《药品不良反应信息通报》(ADRIB)中的一些 DEC 进行进一步的可靠性评估。

结果

通过分层,研究数据集被分为 21 个簇,其中 DRUGs、ADRs 或 DECs 的频率依次遵循相似的数量级。召回率从 29.93%提高到 40.39%,提高了 34.95%;精度从 54.56%降低到 48.82%,降低了 10.52%;F 度量从 38.65%提高到 44.21%,提高了 14.39%。根据 2011 年后的 ADRIB,突出了 5 个与天门冬氨酸钾镁相关的 DEC、61 个与盐酸左氧氟沙星相关的 DEC 和 26 个与头孢唑林相关的 DEC。

结论

所提出的方法有效地、可靠地降低了信号检测中数据掩蔽的影响。考虑到精度的降低,建议将其作为非分层方法的补充,而不是替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c69f/6998200/53821fe05750/12911_2020_1037_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c69f/6998200/b5e40391c45d/12911_2020_1037_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c69f/6998200/ec2da0efe74e/12911_2020_1037_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c69f/6998200/53821fe05750/12911_2020_1037_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c69f/6998200/b5e40391c45d/12911_2020_1037_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c69f/6998200/ec2da0efe74e/12911_2020_1037_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c69f/6998200/53821fe05750/12911_2020_1037_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A stratification method based on clustering for the minimization of data masking effect in signal detection.基于聚类的分层方法可最小化信号检测中的数据掩蔽效应。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Feb 3;20(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1037-z.
2
Assessing the extent and impact of the masking effect of disproportionality analyses on two spontaneous reporting systems databases.评估不均衡性分析的掩盖效应在两个自发报告系统数据库中的程度及影响。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014 Feb;23(2):195-207. doi: 10.1002/pds.3529. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
3
Impact of stratification on adverse drug reaction surveillance.分层对药物不良反应监测的影响。
Drug Saf. 2008;31(11):1035-48. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200831110-00008.
4
Safety related drug-labelling changes: findings from two data mining algorithms.与安全性相关的药品标签变更:两种数据挖掘算法的研究结果
Drug Saf. 2004;27(10):735-44. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200427100-00004.
5
Drug Safety Monitoring in Children: Performance of Signal Detection Algorithms and Impact of Age Stratification.儿童用药安全监测:信号检测算法的性能及年龄分层的影响
Drug Saf. 2016 Sep;39(9):873-81. doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0433-x.
6
Detection of cluster adverse drug events in the spontaneous reporting system of China using a disproportionality filter algorithm.利用不相称性过滤算法在中国自发报告系统中检测簇状不良药物事件。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019 Dec;44(6):952-957. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13021. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
7
Quantitative signal detection for vaccines: effects of stratification, background and masking on GlaxoSmithKline's spontaneous reports database.疫苗的定量信号检测:分层、背景和屏蔽对葛兰素史克自发报告数据库的影响
Hum Vaccin. 2009 Sep;5(9):599-607. doi: 10.4161/hv.9216. Epub 2009 Sep 7.
8
A Method for the Minimization of Competition Bias in Signal Detection from Spontaneous Reporting Databases.一种用于最小化自发报告数据库信号检测中竞争偏差的方法。
Drug Saf. 2016 Mar;39(3):251-60. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0375-8.
9
Criteria revision and performance comparison of three methods of signal detection applied to the spontaneous reporting database of a pharmaceutical manufacturer.制药商自发报告数据库中三种信号检测方法的标准修订与性能比较
Drug Saf. 2007;30(8):715-26. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200730080-00008.
10
Outlier removal to uncover patterns in adverse drug reaction surveillance - a simple unmasking strategy.去除异常值以揭示药物不良反应监测中的模式 - 一种简单的去掩蔽策略。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Oct;22(10):1119-29. doi: 10.1002/pds.3474. Epub 2013 Jul 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Data Sources and US Food and Drug Administration Drug Safety Communications.数据来源与美国食品药品监督管理局药品安全通讯之间的关联
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Nov 1;179(11):1590-1592. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.3066.
2
Novel adverse events of vortioxetine: A disproportionality analysis in USFDA adverse event reporting system database.文拉法辛新的不良反应:美国 FDA 不良事件报告系统数据库中的比例失调分析。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2017 Dec;30:152-156. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
3
Data-mining for detecting signals of adverse drug reactions of fluoxetine using the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System (KAERS) database.
利用韩国不良事件报告系统(KAERS)数据库进行数据挖掘以检测氟西汀的药物不良反应信号。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Oct;256:237-242. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.038. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
4
Signal of Gastrointestinal Congenital Malformations with Antipsychotics After Minimising Competition Bias: A Disproportionality Analysis Using Data from Vigibase(®).最小化竞争偏倚后抗精神病药物与胃肠道先天性畸形的信号:使用Vigibase(®)数据进行的不成比例性分析
Drug Saf. 2016 Jul;39(7):689-96. doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0413-1.
5
A Method for the Minimization of Competition Bias in Signal Detection from Spontaneous Reporting Databases.一种用于最小化自发报告数据库信号检测中竞争偏差的方法。
Drug Saf. 2016 Mar;39(3):251-60. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0375-8.
6
A conceptual approach to the masking effect of measures of disproportionality.不均衡性测量的掩盖效应的概念性方法。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014 Feb;23(2):208-17. doi: 10.1002/pds.3530. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
7
Outlier removal to uncover patterns in adverse drug reaction surveillance - a simple unmasking strategy.去除异常值以揭示药物不良反应监测中的模式 - 一种简单的去掩蔽策略。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Oct;22(10):1119-29. doi: 10.1002/pds.3474. Epub 2013 Jul 7.
8
An experimental investigation of masking in the US FDA adverse event reporting system database.美国 FDA 不良事件报告系统数据库中掩蔽的实验研究。
Drug Saf. 2010 Dec 1;33(12):1117-33. doi: 10.2165/11584390-000000000-00000.
9
A potential competition bias in the detection of safety signals from spontaneous reporting databases.自发报告数据库中信号检测的潜在竞争偏倚。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Nov;19(11):1166-71. doi: 10.1002/pds.2022.
10
Stratification for spontaneous report databases.自发报告数据库的分层
Drug Saf. 2008;31(11):1049-52. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200831110-00009.