Gallinari Marjorie de Oliveira, Cintra Luciano Tavares Angelo, Barboza Ana Carolina Souza, da Silva Lívia Maria Alves Valentim, de Alcantara Sibele, Dos Santos Paulo Henrique, Fagundes Ticiane Cestari, Briso André Luiz Fraga
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2020 Jun;30:101679. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101679. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
To evaluate the bleaching efficacy and post-operative sensitivity of 10 % carbamide peroxide (PC) with or without violet LED (VL).
Thirty patients were selected and were instructed to perform home bleaching treatment using PC 10 %, for 8 h daily, for 21 days. All patients underwent in-office irradiation of only one hemiarch with VL for 30 min, twice per week for three weeks, totaling six clinical sessions of irradiation. The treatment used for each hemiarch was determined randomly. The analyses were performed at the initial time and 7, 14, and 21 days after the start of treatment and 7 and 14 days after the end of the bleaching treatment. For color analysis, digital spectrophotometry was done using the Visual Analog Scale and cold detection was performed using the thermo-sensory analysis II (TSA II) equipment. The ANOVA-two way with repeated measures and the Tukey test (α = 0.05) were used for the color and cold sensitivity analysis.
On analyzing the color change, it was observed that the hemiarch that was irradiated with VL presented the highest values compared with the side that did not receive irradiation. Regarding tooth sensitivity, there was no report of any patient experiencing discomfort during the bleaching protocol. Analysis of the dental thermal sensation threshold showed that the use of VL made the teeth more sensitive.
It can be concluded that the VL provided a positive effect on color alteration when used in conjunction with 10 % PC. However, the use of this new protocol made the teeth more sensitive.
评估含或不含紫光发光二极管(VL)的10%过氧化脲(PC)的漂白效果及术后敏感性。
选取30例患者,指导其使用10%的PC进行家庭漂白治疗,每天8小时,共21天。所有患者仅对一侧半牙弓进行诊室VL照射30分钟,每周两次,共三周,总计六次临床照射疗程。每个半牙弓的治疗方式随机确定。在治疗开始时、治疗开始后7天、14天和21天以及漂白治疗结束后7天和14天进行分析。对于颜色分析,使用视觉模拟量表进行数字分光光度测定,并使用热感觉分析II(TSA II)设备进行冷检测。采用重复测量的双向方差分析和Tukey检验(α = 0.05)进行颜色和冷敏感性分析。
分析颜色变化时发现,接受VL照射的半牙弓与未接受照射的一侧相比呈现出最高的值。关于牙齿敏感性,在漂白方案期间没有任何患者出现不适的报告。对牙齿热感觉阈值的分析表明,使用VL会使牙齿更敏感。
可以得出结论,VL与10%的PC联合使用时对颜色改变有积极作用。然而,这种新方案的使用会使牙齿更敏感。