• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统性硬化症中残疾认知的差异:患者与医疗服务提供者的镜像调查

Differences in Disability Perception in Systemic Sclerosis: A Mirror Survey of Patients and Health Care Providers.

作者信息

Kirren Quentin, Daste Camille, Foissac Frantz, Abdoul Hendy, Alami Sophie, Carrier Marie-Eve, Kwakkenbos Linda, Lefèvre-Colau Marie-Martine, Rannou François, Papelard Agathe, Roren Alexandra, Thombs Brett D, Mouthon Luc, Nguyen Christelle

机构信息

UFR de Médecine, Faculté de Santé, Université Paris Cité, 75006 Paris, France.

Service de Rééducation et de Réadaptation de l'Appareil Locomoteur et des Pathologies du Rachis, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Centre-Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 8;12(4):1359. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041359.

DOI:10.3390/jcm12041359
PMID:36835895
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9959687/
Abstract

Differences in disability perception between patients and care providers may impact outcomes. We aimed to explore differences in disability perception between patients and care providers in systemic sclerosis (SSc). We conducted a cross-sectional internet-based mirror survey. SSc patients participating in the online SPIN Cohort and care providers affiliated with 15 scientific societies were surveyed using the Cochin Scleroderma International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-65 questionnaire, including 65 items (from 0 to 10), representing 9 domains of disability. Mean differences between patients and care providers were calculated. Care providers' characteristics associated with a mean difference ≥ 2 of 10 points were assessed in multivariate analysis. Answers were analyzed for 109 patients and 105 care providers. The mean age of patients was 55.9 (14.7) years and the disease duration was 10.1 (7.5) years. For all domains of the ICF-65, care providers' rates were higher than those of patients. The mean difference was 2.4 (1.0) of 10 points. Care providers' characteristics associated with this difference were organ-based specialty (OR = 7.0 [2.3-21.2]), younger age (OR = 2.7 [1.0-7.1]) and following patients with disease duration ≥5 years (OR = 3.0 [1.1-8.7]). We found systematic differences in disability perception between patients and care providers in SSc.

摘要

患者与医护人员对残疾的认知差异可能会影响治疗结果。我们旨在探讨系统性硬化症(SSc)患者与医护人员在残疾认知方面的差异。我们开展了一项基于互联网的横断面镜像调查。使用科钦硬皮病国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)-65问卷对参与在线SPIN队列研究的SSc患者以及隶属于15个科学协会的医护人员进行了调查,该问卷包含65个项目(从0到10),代表9个残疾领域。计算了患者与医护人员之间的平均差异。在多变量分析中评估了与平均差异≥2(满分10分)相关的医护人员特征。对109名患者和105名医护人员的回答进行了分析。患者的平均年龄为55.9(14.7)岁,病程为10.1(7.5)年。对于ICF-65的所有领域,医护人员的评分均高于患者。平均差异为满分10分中的2.4(1.0)分。与这种差异相关的医护人员特征包括基于器官的专业(比值比[OR]=7.0[2.3 - 21.2])、年龄较小(OR = 2.7[1.0 - 7.1])以及随访病程≥5年的患者(OR = 3.0[1.1 - 8.7])。我们发现SSc患者与医护人员在残疾认知方面存在系统性差异。

相似文献

1
Differences in Disability Perception in Systemic Sclerosis: A Mirror Survey of Patients and Health Care Providers.系统性硬化症中残疾认知的差异:患者与医疗服务提供者的镜像调查
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 8;12(4):1359. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041359.
2
Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure to assess activities and participation in people with systemic sclerosis: the Cochin 17-item Scleroderma Functional scale.开发一种新的患者报告结局指标,以评估系统性硬化症患者的活动和参与情况:科钦17项硬皮病功能量表。
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Oct;183(4):710-718. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18922. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
3
Patient preference disability questionnaire in systemic sclerosis: a cross-sectional survey.系统性硬化症患者偏好残疾问卷:一项横断面调查。
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jul 15;59(7):968-73. doi: 10.1002/art.23819.
4
Construction of an ICF core set and ICF-based questionnaire assessing activities and participation in patients with systemic sclerosis.构建 ICF 核心组及基于 ICF 的问卷评估系统性硬化症患者的活动和参与情况。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Dec 1;58(12):2260-2272. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez209.
5
Assessing disability and quality of life in systemic sclerosis: construct validities of the Cochin Hand Function Scale, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Systemic Sclerosis HAQ, and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey.评估系统性硬化症患者的残疾情况和生活质量:科钦手功能量表、健康评估问卷(HAQ)、系统性硬化症HAQ及医学结局研究36项简短健康调查的结构效度。
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Feb 15;57(1):94-102. doi: 10.1002/art.22468.
6
The evaluation of a home-based program for hands in patients with systemic sclerosis.系统性硬化症患者手部家庭康复方案的评估。
J Hand Ther. 2019 Jul-Sep;32(3):313-321. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
7
Impaired quality of life in systemic sclerosis and patient perception of the disease: A large international survey.系统性硬化症患者的生活质量受损及对疾病的认知:一项大型国际调查。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Aug;46(1):115-23. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
8
Impact of systemic sclerosis on occupational and professional activity with attention to patients with digital ulcers.系统性硬化症对职业和专业活动的影响,关注有指端溃疡的患者。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Feb;63(2):277-85. doi: 10.1002/acr.20342.
9
Systemic Sclerosis and Perceptions of Quality in Primary Care.系统性硬化症与基层医疗中的质量认知
Am J Med Sci. 2016 May;351(5):447-51. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2016.02.021. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
10
Opening the black box of non-pharmacological care in systemic sclerosis: a cross-sectional online survey of Dutch health professionals.打开系统性硬化症非药物治疗的“黑箱”:荷兰卫生专业人员横断面在线调查。
Rheumatol Int. 2021 Jul;41(7):1299-1310. doi: 10.1007/s00296-020-04765-4. Epub 2020 Dec 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure to assess activities and participation in people with systemic sclerosis: the Cochin 17-item Scleroderma Functional scale.开发一种新的患者报告结局指标,以评估系统性硬化症患者的活动和参与情况:科钦17项硬皮病功能量表。
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Oct;183(4):710-718. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18922. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
2
Construction of an ICF core set and ICF-based questionnaire assessing activities and participation in patients with systemic sclerosis.构建 ICF 核心组及基于 ICF 的问卷评估系统性硬化症患者的活动和参与情况。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Dec 1;58(12):2260-2272. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez209.
3
Changes in disability and their relationship with skin thickening, in diffuse and limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a retrospective cohort study.弥漫性和局限性皮肤系统性硬化症患者残疾变化及其与皮肤增厚的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
Scand J Rheumatol. 2019 May;48(3):230-234. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2018.1523455. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
4
A cross-sectional study on factors associated with patient-physician discordance in global assessment of patients with axial spondyloarthritis: an Asian perspective.一项关于中轴型脊柱关节炎患者整体评估中患者与医生意见不一致相关因素的横断面研究:亚洲视角
Int J Rheum Dis. 2018 Jul;21(7):1436-1442. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13299. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
5
Patient acceptable symptom state and minimal clinically important difference for patient-reported outcomes in systemic sclerosis: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing personalized physical therapy to usual care.患者可接受的症状状态和最小临床重要差异的患者报告结局在系统性硬化症:一项比较个体化物理治疗与常规护理的随机对照试验的二次分析。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Feb;48(4):694-700. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
6
Illness representations of systemic lupus erythematosus and systemic sclerosis: a comparison of patients, their rheumatologists and their general practitioners.系统性红斑狼疮和系统性硬化症的疾病表征:患者、风湿病学家和全科医生的比较
Lupus Sci Med. 2017 Nov 14;4(1):e000232. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2017-000232. eCollection 2017.
7
Perception of symptoms and quality of life - comparison of patients' and physicians' views in the COPD MIRROR study.症状认知与生活质量——慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)MIRROR研究中患者与医生观点的比较
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Jul 27;12:2189-2196. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S136711. eCollection 2017.
8
Discordance of patient and physician health status concerns in systemic lupus erythematosus.系统性红斑狼疮患者与医生健康关注点的不一致。
Lupus. 2018 Mar;27(3):501-506. doi: 10.1177/0961203317722412. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
9
Systemic sclerosis.系统性硬化症。
Lancet. 2017 Oct 7;390(10103):1685-1699. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30933-9. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
10
Later-Life Disability in Environmental Context: Why Living Arrangements Matter.环境背景下的晚年失能:为什么居住安排很重要。
Gerontologist. 2018 Sep 14;58(5):853-862. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx019.