Stupak Radosław, Dobroczyński Bartłomiej
Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Instytut Psychologii.
Psychiatr Pol. 2019 Dec 31;53(6):1351-1364. doi: 10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/91731.
The article presents a somehow forgotten, yet largely controversial, experiment and therapeutic phenomenon known as Soteria Research Project. History, circumstances and main methodological assumptions of the experiment are briefly presented. Theoretical inspirations behind therapeutic model of Soteria are discussed and analyzed, and the results of the experiment are shortly described. The Soteria Research Project is placed in historical and contemporary context and compared to other theoretical propositions and practical solutions. A summary of critical arguments against Soteria is presented. Results of the Soteria Research Project suggest that therapeutic methods employed there were at least as effective as hospital treatment as usual, despite a radical reduction in, or even a complete lack of, pharmacotherapy. These results are still very important in the context of the debate concerning effective and ethical treatment of psychiatric disorders. It is claimed that Soteria was an attempt of restoring the importance of subjective experiences and subjectivity of a psychiatric patient in organized mental health care and a forerunner of contemporary postpsychiatric approaches, which postulate larger autonomy of patients, criticize sole reliance on pharmacotherapy and contemporary diagnostic systems, and underline the importance of psychotherapeutic interventions.
本文介绍了一个在某种程度上被遗忘但极具争议的实验及治疗现象,即索泰里亚研究项目。文章简要介绍了该实验的历史、背景及主要方法假设。探讨并分析了索泰里亚治疗模式背后的理论灵感,并简要描述了实验结果。将索泰里亚研究项目置于历史和当代背景下,并与其他理论主张和实际解决方案进行比较。同时呈现了对索泰里亚的批判性观点总结。索泰里亚研究项目的结果表明,尽管药物治疗大幅减少甚至完全没有,但该项目所采用的治疗方法至少与常规医院治疗一样有效。在关于精神疾病有效且符合伦理的治疗的辩论背景下,这些结果仍然非常重要。有人认为,索泰里亚是在有组织的精神卫生保健中恢复精神病患者主观体验和主体性重要性的一次尝试,也是当代后精神病学方法的先驱,后一种方法主张患者有更大的自主权,批评单纯依赖药物治疗和当代诊断系统,并强调心理治疗干预的重要性。