Ciompi L, Kupper Z, Aebi E, Dauwalder H P, Hubschmid T, Trütsch K, Rutishauser C
Sozialpsychiatrische Universitätsklinik Bern.
Nervenarzt. 1993 Jul;64(7):440-50.
Following on a previous publication [15], outcomes of 22 acute schizophrenic index patients treated mainly with no- or low-medication strategies and with milieu therapeutic, socio-therapeutic and psychotherapeutic methods in the open therapeutic community "Soteria Berne" are compared, in a 2-year prospective study, with pairwise matched controls from 4 different traditional settings. There were no significant differences concerning psychopathology, living situation, work situation, combined evaluation and relapse rate after 2 years. Total dosage of medication was less than half, but total costs about 1/3 higher in the index group. Differences of costs were directly related to the inclusion of the-often prolonged-phase of rehabilitation in the in-patient treatment in "Soteria", and disappear when this phase is shifted to other settings. These results and additional observations concerning subjective aspects speak in favour of the creation of other treatment facilities of the same type.
继之前的一篇出版物[15]之后,在一项为期两年的前瞻性研究中,对22名主要采用无药或低药策略以及在开放式治疗社区“Soteria Berne”中采用环境治疗、社会治疗和心理治疗方法治疗的急性精神分裂症指数患者的结果,与来自4种不同传统环境的配对对照进行了比较。两年后,在精神病理学、生活状况、工作状况、综合评估和复发率方面没有显著差异。指数组的药物总剂量不到一半,但总成本高出约三分之一。成本差异直接与“Soteria”住院治疗中通常延长的康复阶段的纳入有关,当这个阶段转移到其他环境时,差异就会消失。这些结果以及关于主观方面的其他观察结果支持创建其他同类治疗设施。