Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychology, Richmond, VA.
Associate Professor, Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychology, Richmond, VA.
Am J Health Behav. 2020 Mar 1;44(2):118-128. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.44.2.1.
Although the All Aspects of Health Literacy Scale (AAHLS) is a commonly used measure of health literacy, the psychometric evaluation approach employed in its original validation is questionable. In this study, we evaluated the psychometric properties and factor structure of the AAHLS using widely-accepted analytic methods. We collected data from 393 students from a Mid-Atlantic university. Participants completed the AAHLS in an online format. We conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to determine whether a different factor/subscale structure emerged in this sample than in the original validation sample. We ran follow-up confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs). The EFA suggested an 11-item, 4-factor model. The CFA of the 4-factor model had adequate model fit but evidenced several low item loadings, suggesting that several items did not perform well. We tested a modified 8-item, 3-factor model that had good fit and high item loadings. Compared to the original factor structure, the functional health literacy subscale was removed. The newly proposed 3-factor/subscale model with 8 items captures communicative health literacy and 2 separate aspects of critical health literacy. Further replication in other diverse samples is warranted to investigate the psychometric properties of the AAHLS, although we recommend use of the revised version over the original.
尽管全面健康素养量表(AAHLS)是一种常用的健康素养衡量工具,但它最初验证中采用的心理计量评估方法存在疑问。在这项研究中,我们使用广泛接受的分析方法评估了 AAHLS 的心理计量学特性和因子结构。我们从大西洋中部一所大学的 393 名学生那里收集了数据。参与者以在线形式完成了 AAHLS。我们进行了探索性因素分析(EFA),以确定在这个样本中是否出现了与原始验证样本不同的因子/子量表结构。我们进行了后续验证性因素分析(CFA)。EFA 表明存在一个 11 项 4 因子模型。4 因子模型的 CFA 具有较好的模型拟合度,但存在几个低项目负荷,表明有些项目表现不佳。我们测试了一个经过修正的 8 项 3 因子模型,该模型具有良好的拟合度和较高的项目负荷。与原始因子结构相比,功能性健康素养子量表被删除。新提出的 8 项 3 因子/子量表模型可捕捉沟通健康素养和批判性健康素养的 2 个独立方面。需要在其他不同的样本中进一步复制,以研究 AAHLS 的心理计量学特性,尽管我们建议使用修正后的版本而不是原始版本。