Suppr超能文献

比较中国中年女性在地面和电动跑步机跑步时的能量消耗和底物代谢。

Comparison of energy expenditure and substrate metabolism during overground and motorized treadmill running in Chinese middle-aged women.

机构信息

School of Sport Science, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.

China Institute of Sport Science, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 4;10(1):1815. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58791-0.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare differences of energy expenditure and substrate metabolism between motorized-treadmill and overground running in three different velocities in Chinese middle-aged women. In total, 74 healthy middle-aged women (age, 48 ± 4 years; height, 159.4 ± 4.9 cm; weight, 58.6 ± 6.7 kg; and body-mass index (BMI), 23.1 ± 2.7 kg/m) volunteered to participate in this study. Bioelectrical-impedance analysis was used to measure body composition. Energy expenditure, carbohydrates (CHO), and fat oxidation were calculated with indirect calorimetry during motorized-treadmill and overground running. Running speed from slow to fast was 7.0, 8.0, and 9.0 km/h. The duration of each velocity was 6 min, separated by 5-15 min rest. There was no significant difference in energy expenditure between overground and treadmill running at the speed of 7 km/h (8.10 ± 1.25 vs. 7.75 ± 1.13 kcal/min, p > 0.05). Energy expenditure of overground running at 8 and 9 km/h was higher than that of treadmill running (9.36 ± 1.40 vs. 8.54 ± 1.21 kcal/min; 10.33 ± 1.55 vs. 9.54 ± 1.36 kcal/min; both p < 0.01). Fat contribution to energy consumption was significantly higher during treadmill running than during overground running (both p < 0.01) at speeds of 8 and 9 km/h. Overground running at high intensity incurred greater energy consumption than treadmill running did. However, results showed greater fat utilization during treadmill running than during overground running at high intensity. It is critical that these differences are taken into account when we prescribe training modes and intensities for middle-aged women.

摘要

本研究旨在比较电动跑步机和地面跑步在三种不同速度下对中国中年女性的能量消耗和底物代谢的差异。共有 74 名健康的中年女性(年龄 48±4 岁;身高 159.4±4.9cm;体重 58.6±6.7kg;体重指数(BMI)23.1±2.7kg/m)自愿参加本研究。生物电阻抗分析用于测量身体成分。在电动跑步机和地面跑步时,间接测热法测量能量消耗、碳水化合物(CHO)和脂肪氧化。从慢到快的跑步速度分别为 7.0、8.0 和 9.0km/h。每种速度的持续时间为 6 分钟,中间休息 5-15 分钟。在 7km/h 的速度下,地面跑步和跑步机跑步的能量消耗没有显著差异(8.10±1.25 与 7.75±1.13kcal/min,p>0.05)。8 和 9km/h 时地面跑步的能量消耗高于跑步机跑步(9.36±1.40 与 8.54±1.21kcal/min;10.33±1.55 与 9.54±1.36kcal/min;均 p<0.01)。在 8 和 9km/h 的速度下,跑步机跑步时脂肪对能量消耗的贡献明显高于地面跑步(均 p<0.01)。高强度的地面跑步比跑步机跑步消耗更多的能量。然而,结果表明,在高强度下跑步机跑步比地面跑步时脂肪利用率更高。在为中年女性规定训练模式和强度时,必须考虑到这些差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验