Suppr超能文献

比较观察、腋窝放疗和完成腋窝淋巴结清扫术治疗前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者腋窝:系统评价。

Comparing Observation, Axillary Radiotherapy, and Completion Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Management of Axilla in Breast Cancer in Patients with Positive Sentinel Nodes: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug;27(8):2664-2676. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08225-y. Epub 2020 Feb 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated observation or axillary radiotherapy (ART) in place of completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) for management of positive sentinel nodes (SNs) in clinically node-negative women with breast cancer. The optimal treatment strategy for this population is not known.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and EBM Reviews-NHS Economic Evaluation Database were searched from inception until July 2019. A systematic review and narrative summary was performed of RCTs comparing observation or ART versus cALND in clinically node-negative female breast cancer patients with positive SNs. The Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs was used to assess risk of bias. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), axillary recurrence, and axillary surgery-related morbidity.

RESULTS

Three trials compared observation with cALND, and two trials compared ART with cALND. No studies blinded participants or personnel, and there was heterogeneity in inclusion criteria, study design, and follow-up. Neither observation nor ART resulted in statistically inferior 5- or 8-year OS or DFS compared with cALND. There was also no statistically significant increase in axillary recurrences associated with either approach. Four trials reported morbidity outcomes, and all showed cALND was associated with significantly more lymphedema, paresthesia, and shoulder dysfunction compared with observation or ART.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with clinically node-negative breast cancer and positive SNs can safely be managed without cALND.

摘要

目的

几项随机对照试验(RCT)已经研究了在临床淋巴结阴性的乳腺癌女性中,对于阳性前哨淋巴结(SNs),观察或腋窝放疗(ART)替代完成腋窝淋巴结清扫术(cALND)的效果。对于这部分人群,最佳的治疗策略尚不清楚。

方法

从建库至 2019 年 7 月,我们检索了 MEDLINE、Embase 和 EBM Reviews-NHS 经济评估数据库。我们对比较观察或 ART 与 cALND 治疗临床淋巴结阴性的乳腺癌伴阳性 SNs 女性患者的 RCT 进行了系统评价和叙述性总结。我们使用 Cochrane RCT 偏倚风险工具评估了偏倚风险。感兴趣的结局包括总生存(OS)、无病生存(DFS)、腋窝复发和腋窝手术相关的发病率。

结果

三项试验比较了观察与 cALND,两项试验比较了 ART 与 cALND。没有研究对参与者或人员进行盲法,且纳入标准、研究设计和随访存在异质性。观察或 ART 并未导致 5 年或 8 年 OS 或 DFS 统计学上的降低,与 cALND 相比。两种方法也没有导致腋窝复发的统计学显著增加。四项试验报告了发病率结局,所有试验均表明,与观察或 ART 相比,cALND 与明显更多的淋巴水肿、感觉异常和肩部功能障碍相关。

结论

对于临床淋巴结阴性且伴有阳性 SNs 的乳腺癌女性,可以安全地不进行 cALND。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验