Department of Soil Biogeochemistry, Soil Ecology, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Department of Soil Ecology, UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Ecology. 2020 May;101(5):e03003. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3003. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
Plant growth is often co-limited by nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). Plants might use one element to acquire another (i.e., trading N for P and P for N), which potentially explains synergistic growth responses to NP addition. We studied a 66-yr-old grassland experiment in South Africa that consists of four levels of N addition with and without P addition. We investigated the response of aboveground net primary production (ANPP) to N and P addition over the last 66 yr. Further, we tested whether phosphatase activity and plant P uptake depend on N availability, and vice versa, whether non-symbiotic N fixation and plant N uptake depend on P availability. We expected that the interaction of both elements promote processes of nutrient acquisition and contribute to synergistic plant growth effects in response to NP addition. We found synergistic N and P co-limitation of ANPP for the period from 1951 to 2017 but the response to N and P addition diminished over time. In 2017, aboveground P stocks, relative rRNA operon abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and soil organic P storage increased with N fertilization rate when N was added with P compared to the treatment in which only N was added. Further, N addition increased phosphatase activity, which indicates that plants used N to acquire P from organic sources. In contrast, aboveground N stocks and non-symbiotic N fixation did not change significantly due to P addition. Taken together, our results indicate that trading N for P likely contributes to synergistic plant-growth response. Plants used added N to mobilize and take up P from organic sources, inducing stronger recycling of P and making the plant community less sensitive to external nutrient inputs. The latter could explain why indications of synergistic co-limitation diminished over time, which is usually overlooked in short-term nutrient addition experiments.
植物的生长通常受到氮(N)和磷(P)的共同限制。植物可能会利用一种元素来获取另一种元素(即 N 换 P 和 P 换 N),这可能解释了 NP 添加对协同生长的响应。我们研究了南非一个拥有 66 年历史的草地实验,该实验包含有和没有 P 添加的四种 N 添加水平。我们调查了过去 66 年中地上净初级生产力(ANPP)对 N 和 P 添加的响应。此外,我们测试了磷酸酶活性和植物 P 吸收是否取决于 N 的可用性,反之亦然,非共生固氮和植物 N 吸收是否取决于 P 的可用性。我们预计这两种元素的相互作用会促进养分获取过程,并有助于 NP 添加对植物生长的协同效应。我们发现,在 1951 年至 2017 年期间,ANPP 受到 N 和 P 的协同限制,但对 N 和 P 添加的响应随时间减弱。2017 年,与仅添加 N 的处理相比,当 N 与 P 一起添加时,地上 P 储量、丛枝菌根真菌相对 rRNA 操纵子丰度和土壤有机 P 储存随着 N 施肥率的增加而增加。此外,N 添加增加了磷酸酶活性,这表明植物利用 N 从有机来源获取 P。相比之下,由于 P 添加,地上 N 储量和非共生固氮没有显著变化。总的来说,我们的结果表明,N 换 P 可能有助于协同的植物生长响应。植物利用添加的 N 从有机来源中动员和吸收 P,诱导更强的 P 循环利用,使植物群落对外界养分输入的敏感性降低。后者可以解释为什么协同限制的迹象随着时间的推移而减弱,这在短期养分添加实验中通常被忽视。