Suppr超能文献

巴西补充与综合疗法国家政策的实施:优势与不足

Implementation of Brazil's National Policy on Complementary and Integrative Practices: strengths and weaknesses.

作者信息

Habimorad Pedro Henrique Leonetti, Catarucci Fernanda Martin, Bruno Vânia Hercília Talarico, Silva Ivan Beteto da, Fernandes Violeta Campolina, Demarzo Marcelo Marcos Piva, Spagnuolo Regina Stella, Patricio Karina Pavão

机构信息

Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho. Av. Prof. Mário Rubens Guimarães Montenegro s/n, Campus de Botucatu. 18618-687, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.

Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

出版信息

Cien Saude Colet. 2020 Feb;25(2):395-405. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232020252.11332018. Epub 2018 May 16.

Abstract

This narrative review examines the literature on complementary and integrative practices (CIPs) and their incorporation into Brazil's national health system (Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS) in an attempt to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the implementation of the National Policy on Complementary and Integrative Practices in the SUS (PNPIC, acronym in Portuguese). A search was conducted of the MEDLINE, LILACS, and SciELO databases, resulting in final sample of 25 articles. Our analysis identified five key themes in the literature related to the strengths and weaknesses of policy implementation: 1) Professional training in CIPs in the SUS; 2) structuring the provision of CIPs, access, and health promotion; 3) knowledge, access, and acceptance of service users in relation to CIPs; 4) knowledge of SUS professional staff and managers in relation to the PNPIC; and 5) scope and monitoring and evaluation of the PNPIC. In consonance with the conclusions of the PNPIC management reports, the findings provide a deeper insight into policy implementation problems and reinforce the need to empower the actors involved in this process to tackle these challenges.

摘要

本叙述性综述考察了关于补充与整合性实践(CIPs)及其纳入巴西国家卫生系统(单一卫生系统 - SUS)的文献,旨在了解SUS中补充与整合性实践国家政策(PNPIC,葡萄牙语首字母缩写)实施的优势与不足。我们检索了MEDLINE、LILACS和SciELO数据库,最终得到25篇文章的样本。我们的分析确定了文献中与政策实施的优势和不足相关的五个关键主题:1)SUS中CIPs的专业培训;2)CIPs的提供、获取和健康促进的结构化;3)服务使用者对CIPs的知识、获取和接受度;4)SUS专业人员和管理人员对PNPIC的了解;5)PNPIC的范围以及监测与评估。与PNPIC管理报告的结论一致,这些发现更深入地洞察了政策实施问题,并强化了增强参与这一过程的行为体应对这些挑战的能力的必要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验