Nutrition and Health Research Program, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Australia.
School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
J Clin Psychol. 2020 Jun;76(6):987-1003. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22934. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
This study examined the potential acceptability of wearable devices (e.g., smart headbands, wristbands, and watches) aimed at treating mental health disorders, relative to conventional approaches.
A questionnaire assessed perceptions of wearable and nonwearable treatments, along with demographic and psychological information. Respondents (N = 427) were adults from a community sample (M = 44.6, SD = 15.3) which included current (30.2%) and former (53.9%) mental health help-seekers.
Perceived effectiveness of wearables was a strong predictor of interest in using them as adjuncts to talk therapies, or as an alternative to self-help options (e.g., smartphone applications). Devices were more appealing to those with negative evaluations of psychological therapy and less experience in help-seeking.
Interest in using wearable devices was strong, particularly when devices were seen as effective. Clients with negative attitudes to conventional therapies may be more responsive to using wearable devices as a less directive treatment approach.
本研究考察了可穿戴设备(如智能头带、腕带和手表)治疗心理健康障碍的潜在可接受性,相对于传统方法。
通过问卷调查评估了对可穿戴和不可穿戴治疗的看法,以及人口统计学和心理学信息。受访者(N=427)来自社区样本的成年人(M=44.6,SD=15.3),包括当前(30.2%)和以前(53.9%)寻求心理健康帮助的人。
可穿戴设备的感知有效性是对将其用作谈话疗法的辅助手段或作为自我帮助选择(例如智能手机应用程序)的兴趣的有力预测因素。对于那些对心理治疗评价负面和寻求帮助经验较少的人来说,设备更具吸引力。
使用可穿戴设备的兴趣很强,特别是当设备被认为是有效的。对传统疗法持负面态度的客户可能更愿意使用可穿戴设备作为一种指导作用较弱的治疗方法。