• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

竖脊肌平面阻滞对腹腔镜胆囊切除术麻醉的影响:阿片类药物用量、七氟醚用量及成本分析

The Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block on Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Anesthesia: Analysis of Opioid Consumption, Sevoflurane Consumption, and Cost.

作者信息

Peker Kevser, Akçaboy Zeynep Nur, Aydın Gülçin, Gençay Işın, Şahin Ahmet Tuğrul, Koçak Yahya Fatih, Peker Seydi Ali

机构信息

Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Kırıkkale University Medical Faculty Hospital, Kırıkkale, Turkey.

Medical Biochemistry, Kırıkkale Yuksek Ihtisas Hospital, Kırıkkale, Turkey.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Jul;30(7):725-729. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0809. Epub 2020 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1089/lap.2019.0809
PMID:32023174
Abstract

Erector spinae plane (ESP) block has been increasingly suggested for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) as a part of multimodal analgesia in many studies. However, there is not any study that investigated the perioperative effects of ESP block on anesthetic agent consumption and cost of LC anesthesia. This is the first study that evaluates the effect of ESP block in terms of cost-effectiveness, intraoperative consumption of inhalation agents, and perioperative consumption of opioids. In this prospective observational study, 81 patients who underwent LC were included. Patients were divided into two groups: In Group ESP ( = 39) bilateral ultrasound-guided ESP block was performed in preoperative period and in Group non-ESP ( = 42) ESP block was not performed. After standard general anesthesia protocol, anesthesia was maintained with 2% sevoflurane in 50% air and 50% oxygen with controlled ventilation in both groups. All patients were monitored with electrocardiography, noninvasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, end-tidal carbon dioxide, and bispectral index. The consumption of sevoflurane and opioids in the intraoperative and postoperative 24 hours was recorded. The costs of drugs were determined by multiplying total consumed amounts with unit prices. The costs and the consumed amounts of remifentanyl, sevoflurane, and tramadol were significantly higher in non-ESP group in the perioperative period (respectively,  < .001,  = .01, and  < .001). ESP block for LC decreased the consumed amount and cost of inhaled agents and opioids in the perioperative period.

摘要

在许多研究中,竖脊肌平面(ESP)阻滞作为多模式镇痛的一部分,越来越多地被推荐用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)。然而,尚无任何研究调查ESP阻滞对LC麻醉中麻醉药物消耗量和成本的围手术期影响。这是第一项从成本效益、术中吸入药物消耗量和围手术期阿片类药物消耗量方面评估ESP阻滞效果的研究。在这项前瞻性观察研究中,纳入了81例行LC的患者。患者分为两组:ESP组(n = 39)在术前进行双侧超声引导下的ESP阻滞,非ESP组(n = 42)未进行ESP阻滞。按照标准全身麻醉方案,两组均采用2%七氟醚、50%空气和50%氧气维持麻醉,并进行控制通气。所有患者均接受心电图、无创血压、脉搏血氧饱和度、呼气末二氧化碳和脑电双频指数监测。记录术中及术后24小时七氟醚和阿片类药物的消耗量。药物成本通过将总消耗量乘以单价来确定。围手术期,非ESP组瑞芬太尼、七氟醚和曲马多的成本和消耗量显著更高(分别为P <.001、P = .01和P <.001)。LC的ESP阻滞降低了围手术期吸入药物和阿片类药物的消耗量及成本。

相似文献

1
The Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block on Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Anesthesia: Analysis of Opioid Consumption, Sevoflurane Consumption, and Cost.竖脊肌平面阻滞对腹腔镜胆囊切除术麻醉的影响:阿片类药物用量、七氟醚用量及成本分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Jul;30(7):725-729. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0809. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
2
Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia of adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Randomized, controlled trial.超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞与肋缘下斜腹横肌平面阻滞用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术成年患者术后镇痛的随机对照试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2019 Nov;57:31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
3
[Efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial].[超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛的疗效:一项随机对照试验]
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 Nov-Dec;69(6):561-568. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2019.09.001. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
4
Comparison of the effects of modified pectoral nerve block and erector spinae plane block on postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores of patients after radical mastectomy surgery: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.改良胸大肌神经阻滞与竖脊肌平面阻滞对乳腺癌根治术后患者阿片类药物消耗和疼痛评分影响的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2019 May;54:61-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.10.040. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
5
Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block reduces postoperative opioid consumption following breast surgery: A randomized controlled study.超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞减少乳腺癌手术后阿片类药物的消耗:一项随机对照研究。
J Clin Anesth. 2018 Nov;50:65-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.033. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
6
Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia after Total Abdominal Hysterectomy.双侧超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞在全子宫切除术后的术后镇痛效果比较。
Pain Physician. 2020 Jul;23(4):375-382.
7
Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.双侧竖脊肌平面阻滞用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后镇痛:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Pract. 2021 Mar;21(3):357-365. doi: 10.1111/papr.12953. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
8
The Effect of Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block With and Without Dexmedetomidine on Intraoperative and Postoperative Pain in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Prospective Trial.超声引导双侧竖脊肌平面阻滞联合与不联合右美托咪定对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术中及术后疼痛的影响:一项随机、对照、双盲、前瞻性试验。
Pain Physician. 2022 Oct;25(7):E999-E1008.
9
Bilateral versus unilateral erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study.双侧竖脊肌平面阻滞与单侧竖脊肌平面阻滞用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛的随机对照研究
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2023 Jan-Feb;73(1):72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.04.020. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
10
Comparison of the efficacy of erector spinae plane block performed with different concentrations of bupivacaine on postoperative analgesia after mastectomy surgery: ramdomized, prospective, double blinded trial.不同浓度布比卡因竖脊肌平面阻滞用于乳腺癌术后镇痛效果的比较:随机、前瞻性、双盲试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Mar 4;19(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0700-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Erector spinae block reduces intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A randomized controlled trial.竖脊肌阻滞减少腹腔镜袖状胃切除术患者术中及术后阿片类药物用量:一项随机对照试验
Qatar Med J. 2024 Dec 26;2024(4):58. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2024.58. eCollection 2024.
2
Unilateral Right-Sided Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Post-Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Analgesia: A Randomized Control Trial.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛的单侧右侧超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞:一项随机对照试验
Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Dec 25;12(6):e132152. doi: 10.5812/aapm-132152. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in Chinese patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞用于中国腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后镇痛的双盲随机对照试验。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Feb 28;408(1):111. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02834-3.
4
Analgesic effect of erector spinae plane block in adults undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.成人腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者竖脊肌平面阻滞的镇痛效果:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jan 6;23(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-01969-6.
5
Changes of recovery quality and early cognitive function after treatment of sevoflurane combined with propofol in the elderly undergoing cholecystectomy.七氟醚联合丙泊酚用于老年胆囊切除术患者术后恢复质量及早期认知功能的变化
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Oct 15;13(10):11868-11874. eCollection 2021.
6
The efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with a tissue expander: a randomized clinical trial.乳房切除术后使用组织扩张器即刻乳房重建后超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
Korean J Pain. 2021 Jan 1;34(1):106-113. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.1.106.
7
The Effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Terms of Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.竖脊肌平面阻滞对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后镇痛的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 10;9(9):2928. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092928.