Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020 Feb 4;15(6):874-883. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0308. Print 2020 Jul 1.
To investigate the effects of napping after partial sleep deprivation (PSD) on reaction time, mood, and biochemical response to repeated-sprint exercise in athletes.
Nine male judokas performed 4 test sessions in a counterbalanced and randomized order. Participants accomplished 1 control session after a normal sleep night (NSN) and 3 after PSD with (1) no nap, (2) ∼20-min nap (N20), and (3) ∼90-min nap (N90) opportunities. Test sessions included the running-based anaerobic sprint test, reaction time, Hooper index, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Muscle-damage biomarkers and antioxidant status were evaluated before and after exercise.
PSD decreased maximum (P < .001, d = 1.12), mean (P < .001, d = 1.33), and minimum (P < .001, d = 1.15) powers compared with NSN. However, N20 and N90 enhanced maximum power compared with PSD (P < .05, d = 0.54; P < .001, d = 1.06, respectively). Minimum power and mean power increased only after N90 (P < .001, d = 1.63; P < .001, d = 1.16, respectively). Epworth Sleepiness Scale increased after PSD (P < .001, d = 0.86) and decreased after N20 (P < .001, d = 1.36) and N90 (P < .001, d = 2.07). N20 reduced multiple-choice reaction time (P < .001, d = 0.61). Despite performance decrement, PSD increased postexercise aspartate aminotransferase (P < .001, d = 4.16) and decreased glutathione peroxidase (P < .001, d = 4.02) compared with NSN. However, the highest performances after N90 were accompanied with lesser aspartate aminotransferase (P < .001, d = 1.74) and higher glutathione peroxidase (P < .001, d = 0.86) compared with PSD.
Napping could be preventive against performance degradation caused by sleep loss. A short nap opportunity could be more beneficial when the subsequent effort is brief and requires frequent decision making. However, a longer nap opportunity could be preventive against muscle and oxidative damage, even for higher performances.
研究部分睡眠剥夺(PSD)后小睡对运动员重复冲刺运动时反应时、情绪和生化反应的影响。
9 名男性柔道运动员以平衡和随机的顺序进行了 4 次测试。参与者在正常睡眠夜(NSN)后完成 1 次对照测试,在 PSD 后完成 3 次测试,分别为(1)无小睡、(2)20 分钟小睡(N20)和(3)90 分钟小睡(N90)。测试包括基于跑步的无氧冲刺测试、反应时、胡珀指数和埃普沃斯嗜睡量表。运动前后评估肌肉损伤生物标志物和抗氧化状态。
与 NSN 相比,PSD 降低了最大(P<0.001,d=1.12)、平均(P<0.001,d=1.33)和最小(P<0.001,d=1.15)功率。然而,N20 和 N90 与 PSD 相比增强了最大功率(P<0.05,d=0.54;P<0.001,d=1.06,分别)。仅在 N90 后最小和平均功率增加(P<0.001,d=1.63;P<0.001,d=1.16,分别)。埃普沃斯嗜睡量表在 PSD 后增加(P<0.001,d=0.86),在 N20 和 N90 后减少(P<0.001,d=1.36;P<0.001,d=2.07)。N20 降低了多项选择反应时间(P<0.001,d=0.61)。尽管表现下降,但与 NSN 相比,PSD 增加了运动后天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(P<0.001,d=4.16)并降低了谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(P<0.001,d=4.02)。然而,N90 后最高的表现伴随着较低的天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(P<0.001,d=1.74)和较高的谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(P<0.001,d=0.86)。
小睡可以预防睡眠不足引起的运动表现下降。当随后的努力是短暂的并且需要频繁做出决策时,短暂的小睡机会可能更有益。然而,较长的小睡机会可以预防肌肉和氧化损伤,即使表现更高。