Suppr超能文献

[烧伤患者中一株抗泛耐药菌噬菌体的生物学特性、基因组信息及其对细菌生物膜的影响]

[Biological characteristics and genomic information of a bacteriophage against pan-drug resistant in a burn patient and its effects on bacterial biofilm].

作者信息

Qi Z Y, Yang S Y, Dong S W, Zhao F F, Qin J H, Xiang J

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine, School of Basic Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200025, China.

Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Basic Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200025, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2020 Jan 20;36(1):14-23. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2020.01.004.

Abstract

To isolate a bacteriophage against pan-drug resistant in a burn patient, and to study its biological characteristics, genomic information, and effects on bacterial biofilm. (1) In 2018, pan-drug resistant UA168 (hereinafter referred to as the host bacteria) solution isolated from the blood of a burn patient in Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (hereinafter referred to as Ruijin Hospital) was used to isolate and purify the bacteriophage against pan-drug resistant from the sewage of Ruijin Hospital with sewage co-culture method, drip plate method, and double-agar plate method. The bacteriophage was named as phage KP168 and the plaque morphology was observed. (2) The phage KP168 solution was taken for cesium chloride density gradient centrifugation and dialysis, and then the morphology of phage KP168 was observed through transmission electron microscope after phosphotungstic acid negative staining. (3) The phage KP168 solution was taken to determine the lytic ability of the phage KP168 against 20 strains of pan-drug resistant isolated from the burned patients' blood in Ruijin Hospital by the drip plate method, and then the lysis rate was calculated. (4) The phage KP168 solution at a initial titer of 9.3×10(11) plaque-forming unit (PFU)/mL (400 μL per tube) and the host bacteria solution at a concentration of 1×10(9) colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL (4 mL per tube) were conventionally shaking cultured together for 4 hours at multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10.000, 1.000, 0.100, 0.010, or 0.001, respectively (1 tube per MOI). The titer of phage KP168 was measured by the double-agar plate method (the measurement method was the same below) to select the optimal MOI. The experiment was repeated three times. (5) The host bacteria solution at a concentration of 1×10(9) CFU/mL (4 mL per tube) and the phage KP168 solution at an adjusted titer of 5×10(7) PFU/mL (400 μL per tube) were mixed at the MOI of 0.005. The plaques were counted 0 (immediately), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 15, and 30 minutes (1 tube at each time point) after mixing by the double-agar plate method (the counting method was the same below), and the percentage of adsorbed phages was calculated to screen for the optimal adsorption time. The experiment was repeated three times. (6) The host bacteria solution at a concentration of 1×10(9) CFU/mL (300 μL per tube) and the phage KP168 solution at a titer of 5×10(8) PFU/mL (60 μL per tube) were mixed at MOI of 0.005 and conventionally shaking cultured after standing for the optimal adsorption time. The phage KP168 titer was measured 0 (immediately), 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100 minutes after culture, and a one-step growth curve was drawn. The experiment was repeated three times. (7) The phage KP168 solution at a titer of 2.5×10(10) PFU/mL was left to stand for 1 hour at 37, 40, 50, 60, or 70 ℃ (3 tubes at each time point, 1 mL per tube) for counting the plaques, and then the thermal stability curve was drawn. SM buffer at a pH values of 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 7.4, 8.0, 9.0, or 10.0 were added to the phage KP168 solution at a titer of 3.0×10(10) PFU/mL, respectively. The mixed solution was left to stand for 1 hour at 37 ℃ (3 tubes of each pH, each tube containing 100 μL phage KP168 solution and 900 μL SM buffer), and then the plaques were counted, and an acid-base stability curve was drawn. (8) The phage KP168 solution was taken for DNA extraction and sequencing after dialysis as in experiment (2). The whole genome was annotated with Prokka to obtain the coding sequence of phage KP168. Nucleotide's BLAST function was used to proceed nucleic acid sequence alignment for finding a known phage with the highest similarity to the phage KP168 nucleic acid sequence, and Blastx function was used to translate the coding sequence into protein for its function prediction. The comparison with Antibiotic Resistance Genes Database and Virulence Factors Database was proceeded. (9) In a 96-well plate, at a MOI of 1.000, 0.100, 0.010 or 0.001 (3 wells per MOI), 20 μL phage KP168 solution at a initial titer of 5.8×10(10) PFU/mL was added to 200 μL host bacteria solution at a concentration of 1.5×10(8) CFU/mL (the same concentration below) for co-cultivation for 48 hours. After 200 μL host bacteria solution was left to stand for 48 hours, 20 μL phage KP168 solution at a titer of 1×10(6,) 1×10(7,) 1×10(8,) 1×10(9,) or 1×10(10) PFU/mL (3 wells per titer) was added respectively for action for 4 hours. In both experiments, 200 μL host bacteria solution added with 20 μL SM buffer (3 wells) acted as a negative control, and 220 μL LB culture medium (3 wells) acted as a blank control. Absorbance values were measured by a microplate reader, and inhibition/destruction rates of biofilm were calculated. The experiments were both repeated three times. (1) The plaques of phage KP168 successfully isolated and purified were transparent and round, and its diameter was approximately 1.5 mm. (2) The phage KP168 has a regular polyhedron structure with a diameter of about 50 nm and without a tail. (3) The phage KP168 could lyse 13 of 20 strains of from burned patients, with a lysis rate of 65.0%. (4) When MOI was 1.000, the titer was the highest after co-culturing the phage KP168 with the host bacteria for 4 hours, which was the optimal MOI. (5) After the mixing of the phage KP168 with the host bacteria for 4 minutes, the percentage of the adsorbed phage reached the highest, which was the optimal adsorption time. (6) The one-step growth curve showed that during the lysis of the host bacteria by phage KP168, the incubation period was about 10 minutes, and the lysis period was about 40 minutes. (7) With the condition of 40 ℃ or pH 7.4, the number of plaques and the activity of phage KP168 reached the highest. (8) The genome of phage KP168 was a linear double-stranded DNA with a length of 40 114 bp. There were 48 possible coding sequences. It had the highest similarity to Klebsiella phage_vB_Kp1. The most similar known proteins corresponding to the translated proteins of coding sequences contained 23 hypothetical proteins and 25 proteins with known functions. No resistance genes or virulence factor genes were found. The GeneBank accession number was KT367885. (9) After 48 hours of co-cultivation of the phage KP168 and the host bacteria at each MOI, the inhibition rates of biofilm were similar, with an average of about 45%. After the phage KP168 with a titer of 1×10(9) PFU/mL acted on the biofilm formed by the host bacteria for 4 h, the destruction rate of biofilm was the highest, reaching an average of 42%. In this study, a bacteriophage against pan-drug resistant from a burn patient, phage KP168, is isolated from sewage, which belongs to the tailless phage. It has a wide host spectrum, short adsorption time, and short incubation period, with certain thermal and acid-base stability. Its genomic information is clear, and it does not contain resistance genes or virulence factor genes. It also has an inhibitory effect on the formation of bacterial biofilm and a destructive effect on the formed bacterial biofilm.

摘要

为从一名烧伤患者中分离出针对泛耐药菌的噬菌体,并研究其生物学特性、基因组信息以及对细菌生物膜的影响。(1)2018年,采用污水共培养法、点滴平板法和双层琼脂平板法,利用从上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院(以下简称瑞金医院)一名烧伤患者血液中分离出的泛耐药菌UA168(以下简称宿主菌)溶液,从瑞金医院污水中分离纯化针对泛耐药菌的噬菌体。该噬菌体命名为噬菌体KP168,并观察其噬菌斑形态。(2)取噬菌体KP168溶液进行氯化铯密度梯度离心和透析,然后经磷钨酸负染后通过透射电子显微镜观察噬菌体KP168的形态。(3)取噬菌体KP168溶液,通过点滴平板法测定噬菌体KP168对从瑞金医院烧伤患者血液中分离出的20株泛耐药菌的裂解能力,然后计算裂解率。(4)将初始滴度为9.3×10¹¹噬菌斑形成单位(PFU)/mL的噬菌体KP168溶液(每管400 μL)和浓度为1×10⁹菌落形成单位(CFU)/mL的宿主菌溶液(每管4 mL),分别以感染复数(MOI)为10.000、1.000、0.100、0.010或0.001进行常规振荡共培养4小时(每个MOI设1管)。采用双层琼脂平板法测定噬菌体KP168的滴度(测定方法同下),以选择最佳MOI。实验重复3次。(5)将浓度为1×10⁹ CFU/mL的宿主菌溶液(每管4 mL)和调整滴度为5×10⁷ PFU/mL的噬菌体KP168溶液(每管400 μL)以MOI为0.005混合。混合后立即(0分钟)、1、2、3、4、5、15和30分钟(每个时间点设1管)通过双层琼脂平板法计数噬菌斑(计数方法同下),并计算吸附噬菌体百分比,以筛选最佳吸附时间。实验重复3次。(6)将浓度为1×10⁹ CFU/mL的宿主菌溶液(每管300 μL)和滴度为5×10⁸ PFU/mL的噬菌体KP168溶液(每管60 μL)以MOI为0.005混合,静置最佳吸附时间后进行常规振荡培养。培养后0(立即)、10、20、30、40、50、60、70、80、90和100分钟测定噬菌体KP168滴度,并绘制一步生长曲线。实验重复3次。(7)将滴度为2.5×10¹⁰ PFU/mL的噬菌体KP168溶液分别在37、40、50、60或70℃静置1小时(每个时间点设3管,每管1 mL)用于计数噬菌斑,然后绘制热稳定性曲线。将pH值为5.0、6.0、7.0、7.4、8.0、9.0或10.0的SM缓冲液分别加入滴度为3.0×10¹⁰ PFU/mL的噬菌体KP168溶液中。混合溶液在37℃静置1小时(每个pH设3管,每管含100 μL噬菌体KP168溶液和900 μL SM缓冲液),然后计数噬菌斑,并绘制酸碱稳定性曲线。(8)如实验(2)所述,取透析后的噬菌体KP168溶液进行DNA提取和测序。用Prokka对全基因组进行注释,得到噬菌体KP168的编码序列。利用核苷酸BLAST功能进行核酸序列比对,以找到与噬菌体KP168核酸序列相似度最高的已知噬菌体,并利用Blastx功能将编码序列翻译成蛋白质进行功能预测。与抗生素抗性基因数据库和毒力因子数据库进行比较。(9)在96孔板中,以MOI为1.000、0.100、0.010或0.001(每个MOI设3孔),将初始滴度为5.8×10¹⁰ PFU/mL的20 μL噬菌体KP168溶液加入200 μL浓度为1.5×10⁸ CFU/mL的宿主菌溶液中(下同)进行共培养48小时。200 μL宿主菌溶液静置48小时后,分别加入滴度为1×10⁶、1×10⁷、1×10⁸、1×10⁹或1×10¹⁰ PFU/mL的20 μL噬菌体KP168溶液作用4小时。在两个实验中,加入20 μL SM缓冲液的200 μL宿主菌溶液(3孔)作为阴性对照,220 μL LB培养基(3孔)作为空白对照。用酶标仪测定吸光度值,并计算生物膜抑制/破坏率。实验均重复3次。(1)成功分离纯化的噬菌体KP168噬菌斑透明、圆形,直径约1.5 mm。(2)噬菌体KP168具有规则的多面体结构,直径约50 nm,无尾。(3)噬菌体KP168可裂解20株烧伤患者来源菌株中的13株,裂解率为65.0%。(

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验