• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动且系统的多维需求评估在接近姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者中的应用:一项研究方案。

Proactive and systematic multidimensional needs assessment in patients with advanced cancer approaching palliative care: a study protocol.

机构信息

School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Basic Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 4;10(2):e034413. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034413.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034413
PMID:32024792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7045209/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The benefits of palliative care rely on how healthcare professionals assess patients' needs in the initial encounter/s; crucial to the design of a personalised therapeutic plan. However, there is currently no evidence-based guideline to perform this needs assessment. We aim to design and evaluate a proactive and systematic method for the needs assessment using quality guidelines for developing complex interventions. This will involve patients, their relatives and healthcare professionals in all phases of the study and its communication to offer clinical practice a reliable approach to address the palliative needs of patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

To design and assess the feasibility of an evidence-based, proactive and systematic Multidimensional needs Assessment in Palliative care (MAP) as a semistructured clinical interview guide for initial palliative care encounter/s in patients with advanced cancer. This is a two-phase multisite project conducted over 36 months between May 2019 and May 2022. Phase I includes a systematic review, discussions with stakeholders and Delphi consensus. The evidence gathered from phase I will be the basis for the initial versions of the MAP, then submitted to Delphi consensus to develop a preliminary guide of the MAP for the training of clinicians in the feasibility phase. Phase II is a mixed-methods multicenter feasibility study that will assess the MAP's acceptability, participation, practicality, adaptation and implementation. A nested qualitative study will purposively sample a subset of participants to add preliminary clues about the benefits and barriers of the MAP. The evidence gathered from phase II will build a MAP user guide and educational programme for use in clinical practice.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval for this study has been granted by the university research ethics committee where the study will be carried out (approval reference MED-2018-10). Dissemination will be informed by the results obtained and communication will occur throughout.

摘要

简介

姑息治疗的益处取决于医疗保健专业人员在初次接触/时如何评估患者的需求;这对于制定个性化治疗计划至关重要。然而,目前没有基于证据的指南来进行这种需求评估。我们旨在使用开发复杂干预措施的质量指南来设计和评估一种主动的、系统的需求评估方法。这将涉及患者、他们的亲属和医疗保健专业人员在研究的所有阶段及其沟通,为临床实践提供一种可靠的方法来满足患者的姑息治疗需求。

方法和分析

设计并评估一种基于证据的、主动的和系统的姑息治疗多维需求评估(MAP)的可行性,作为一种半结构化的临床访谈指南,用于晚期癌症患者的初始姑息治疗接触/。这是一个为期 36 个月的两阶段多地点项目,于 2019 年 5 月至 2022 年 5 月进行。第 I 阶段包括系统评价、与利益相关者的讨论和德尔菲共识。第 I 阶段收集的证据将是 MAP 的初始版本的基础,然后提交给德尔菲共识,以制定 MAP 的初步指南,用于在可行性阶段培训临床医生。第 II 阶段是一项混合方法多中心可行性研究,将评估 MAP 的可接受性、参与性、实用性、适应性和实施情况。一项嵌套的定性研究将有目的地选择一部分参与者,以初步了解 MAP 的益处和障碍。第 II 阶段收集的证据将构建一个 MAP 用户指南和教育计划,用于临床实践。

伦理和传播

该研究的伦理批准已获得将进行研究的大学研究伦理委员会的批准(批准参考号 MED-2018-10)。传播将根据获得的结果进行,并将在整个过程中进行沟通。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e066/7045209/eb32cfb23fc2/bmjopen-2019-034413f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e066/7045209/eb32cfb23fc2/bmjopen-2019-034413f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e066/7045209/eb32cfb23fc2/bmjopen-2019-034413f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Proactive and systematic multidimensional needs assessment in patients with advanced cancer approaching palliative care: a study protocol.主动且系统的多维需求评估在接近姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者中的应用:一项研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 4;10(2):e034413. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034413.
2
Development of a Guide to Multidimensional Needs Assessment in the Palliative Care Initial Encounter (MAP).制定《舒缓治疗初始评估多维需求指南》(MAP)。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Oct;66(4):361-369.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.07.011. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Developing a complex intervention to support timely engagement with palliative care for patients with advanced cancer in primary and secondary care in the UK: a study protocol.在英国初级和二级医疗保健中,为晚期癌症患者制定一项复杂干预措施以支持其及时接受姑息治疗:一项研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 May 14;8(5):e022835. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022835.
5
Healthcare users' experiences of communicating with healthcare professionals about children who have life-limiting conditions: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医疗保健使用者就患有危及生命疾病的儿童与医疗保健专业人员沟通的经历:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):33-42. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2413.
6
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
7
Implementation of quality indicators for palliative care for patients with incurable cancer at palliative care units in Germany (Quincie): a study protocol for a mixed-methods study.德国姑息治疗病房对不可治愈癌症患者的姑息治疗质量指标的实施(Quincie):一项混合方法研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 25;14(6):e077457. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077457.
8
Development of a tool for palliative care needs assessment and intervention: mixed methods research at a Swiss tertiary oncology clinic.开发一种姑息治疗需求评估和干预工具:瑞士一家肿瘤学三级诊所的混合方法研究。
Ann Palliat Med. 2023 May;12(3):496-506. doi: 10.21037/apm-22-994. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
9
Development of a core outcome set to use in the research and assessment of malignant bowel obstruction: protocol for the RAMBO study.制定用于恶性肠梗阻研究和评估的核心结局集:RAMBO 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 28;10(6):e039154. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039154.
10
Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care: a participatory systematic mixed studies review protocol.基层医疗中具有复杂护理需求患者的决策需求评估:一项参与式系统混合研究综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 12;7(11):e016400. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016400.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of a clinical interview guide to Multidimensional needs assessment in Palliative care (MAP): A multicenter mixed-methods feasibility study.实施姑息治疗多维需求评估临床访谈指南(MAP):一项多中心混合方法可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 31;20(7):e0329354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329354. eCollection 2025.
2
Prevalence of dyspnoea and usage of opioids in managing dyspnoea in advanced cancer patients: a longitudinal observational multi-centre study from India.晚期癌症患者呼吸困难的患病率及阿片类药物在治疗呼吸困难中的应用:一项来自印度的纵向观察性多中心研究。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2022 Dec 2;16:1482. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2022.1482. eCollection 2022.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A Systematic Review in Support of the National Consensus Project Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care, Fourth Edition.支持国家共识项目第四版优质姑息治疗临床实践指南的系统评价。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Dec;56(6):831-870. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
2
Integration of oncology and palliative care: a Lancet Oncology Commission.肿瘤学与姑息治疗的整合:柳叶刀肿瘤学委员会报告
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):e588-e653. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30415-7. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
3
Key components of knowledge transfer and exchange in health services research: Findings from a systematic scoping review.
Palliative and prognostic approach in cancer patients identified in the multicentre NECesidades PALiativas 2 study in Argentina.
阿根廷多中心NECesidades PALiativas 2研究中确诊的癌症患者的姑息治疗和预后评估方法
Ecancermedicalscience. 2021 Nov 10;15:1316. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1316. eCollection 2021.
卫生服务研究中知识转移和交流的关键组成部分:系统范围综述的结果。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Feb;75(2):313-326. doi: 10.1111/jan.13836. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
4
European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) position paper on supportive and palliative care.欧洲肿瘤内科学会(ESMO)关于支持和姑息治疗的立场文件。
Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(1):36-43. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx757.
5
Integration of Palliative Care Into Standard Oncology Care: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update Summary.将姑息治疗纳入标准肿瘤治疗:美国临床肿瘤学会临床实践指南更新摘要
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Feb;13(2):119-121. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.017897. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
6
Effects of Early Integrated Palliative Care on Caregivers of Patients with Lung and Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.早期综合姑息治疗对肺癌和胃肠道癌患者照顾者的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Oncologist. 2017 Dec;22(12):1528-1534. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0227. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
7
Patient- and Caregiver-Reported Assessment Tools for Palliative Care: Summary of the 2017 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Technical Brief.患者和照护者报告的姑息治疗评估工具:2017 年美国医疗保健研究与质量局技术简报摘要。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Dec;54(6):961-972.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
8
Association Between Palliative Care and Patient and Caregiver Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.姑息治疗与患者及照护者结局之间的关联:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA. 2016 Nov 22;316(20):2104-2114. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16840.
9
How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques.如何使用名词组和德尔菲技术。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Jun;38(3):655-62. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
10
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power.定性访谈研究中的样本量:以信息力为导向
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444. Epub 2016 Jul 10.