Aslam Hafiz M, Naeem Hafiz S, Prabhakar Swati, Awwal Talha, Khalid Muhammad, Kaji Anand
Internal Medicine, Seton Hall University / Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Trenton, USA.
Internal Medicine, St. Francis Medical Center, Trenton, USA.
Cureus. 2019 Dec 30;11(12):e6512. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6512.
Hypothesis Beta-blockers (BBs) lower the heart rate, which may mask the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) since one of the main clinical diagnoses of PE is tachycardia. The endpoint of our retrospective study is to determine if the pre-existing use of (BB) significantly affects the utility of these scoring criteria in diagnosing PE. Introduction Diagnosing PE is a challenge because of the non-specificity of its symptoms and signs. The initial step is to assess the patient's likelihood of having a PE. This involves using a scoring system to stratify patients into different levels of risk of having PE (for example, as 'low,' 'moderate,' or 'high' risk). Some of the commonly used criteria are Wells' Score, Geneva Score, and Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) Rule (Charlotte Rule). Methodology This retrospective study was conducted at St. Francis Medical Center. Subjects were taken from a patient population with a new diagnosis of PE (between 2010 and 2017) on the basis of computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the chest. Patients with sepsis or septic shock, heart block, atrioventricular (AV) nodal ablation, pacemaker placement, or taking more than one AV nodal blocker were excluded from the study. Subjects were categorized on the basis of beta-blocker consumption. Result Out of a total of 170 cases, 71 patients were taking beta-blockers and 99 patients were not taking beta-blockers. Among the participants taking BBs, 30.4% had a heart rate <60 and 55.8% had a heart rate between 60 and 100. Conclusion BBs significantly obviate tachycardia in patients with PE. It falsely decreases the Wells' Score and the Geneva Score and results in the inappropriate fulfilling of PERC criteria.
假设 β受体阻滞剂(BBs)会降低心率,这可能会掩盖肺栓塞(PE)的诊断,因为PE的主要临床诊断之一是心动过速。我们这项回顾性研究的目的是确定预先使用(BB)是否会显著影响这些评分标准在诊断PE中的效用。引言 由于PE症状和体征的非特异性,诊断PE具有挑战性。第一步是评估患者患PE的可能性。这涉及使用评分系统将患者分层为患PE的不同风险水平(例如,“低”、“中”或“高”风险)。一些常用的标准是Wells评分、Geneva评分和肺栓塞排除标准(PERC)规则(夏洛特规则)。方法 这项回顾性研究在圣弗朗西斯医疗中心进行。研究对象来自基于胸部计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)新诊断为PE的患者群体(2010年至2017年)。患有败血症或感染性休克、心脏传导阻滞、房室(AV)结消融、起搏器植入或服用不止一种AV结阻滞剂的患者被排除在研究之外。研究对象根据β受体阻滞剂的使用情况进行分类。结果 在总共170例病例中,71例患者服用β受体阻滞剂,99例患者未服用β受体阻滞剂。在服用BBs的参与者中,30.4%的人心率<60,55.8%的人心率在60至100之间。结论 BBs显著消除了PE患者的心动过速。它错误地降低了Wells评分和Geneva评分,并导致不恰当地符合PERC标准。